Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado *** 131.6 (130.3, 133.0) N/A 7,832 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.5)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Summit County *** 58.0 (44.6, 74.1) 61 (55, 61) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -0.9)
Ouray County *** 72.9 (47.7, 111.2) 60 (37, 61) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.9)
Eagle County *** 73.6 (61.5, 87.2) 59 (52, 61) 34 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.4)
Pitkin County *** 75.6 (59.7, 94.8) 58 (48, 61) 18 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.4)
Park County *** 79.8 (63.2, 100.0) 57 (46, 61) 22 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Routt County *** 94.0 (76.8, 113.9) 56 (37, 60) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.6)
Costilla County *** 95.9 (63.8, 142.8) 55 (8, 61) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Kit Carson County *** 97.6 (73.0, 128.9) 54 (21, 61) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Grand County *** 100.5 (78.2, 127.3) 53 (20, 60) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Gunnison County *** 103.3 (80.8, 130.1) 52 (18, 60) 16 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.6)
Clear Creek County *** 104.8 (78.9, 137.3) 51 (9, 60) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.9)
Lake County *** 106.6 (74.5, 147.4) 50 (5, 61) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Archuleta County *** 108.1 (88.0, 132.3) 49 (15, 58) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
San Miguel County *** 109.1 (71.6, 157.9) 48 (3, 61) 8
*
*
Dolores County *** 112.4 (67.8, 184.6) 47 (2, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.9)
Douglas County *** 113.3 (107.6, 119.1) 46 (35, 52) 331 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Custer County *** 114.0 (81.6, 159.4) 45 (4, 60) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
La Plata County *** 116.4 (104.5, 129.3) 44 (24, 53) 77 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Saguache County *** 118.2 (88.2, 156.6) 43 (4, 59) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Teller County *** 119.6 (101.6, 140.2) 42 (10, 55) 41 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Sedgwick County *** 119.8 (76.1, 186.3) 41 (1, 61) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Boulder County 8 *** 120.5 (115.2, 125.9) 40 (30, 48) 411 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Elbert County *** 121.6 (102.8, 142.9) 39 (9, 55) 36 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Broomfield County 8 *** 122.7 (111.2, 135.2) 38 (18, 51) 86 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.2, -3.7)
Chaffee County *** 123.2 (106.3, 142.6) 37 (10, 54) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Larimer County *** 124.6 (119.5, 129.8) 36 (26, 45) 485 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Gilpin County *** 125.0 (80.9, 183.7) 35 (1, 61) 7
*
*
Arapahoe County *** 128.2 (124.2, 132.3) 34 (23, 42) 818 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Conejos County *** 128.9 (100.0, 164.4) 33 (2, 57) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Garfield County *** 129.5 (116.1, 144.0) 32 (10, 49) 74 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Jefferson County 8 *** 129.9 (126.1, 133.8) 31 (22, 40) 909 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Moffat County *** 134.7 (109.3, 164.5) 30 (3, 53) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Weld County 8 *** 135.0 (128.9, 141.4) 29 (14, 37) 385 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Alamosa County *** 135.6 (110.9, 164.2) 28 (3, 52) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Rio Grande County *** 136.1 (111.5, 165.2) 27 (3, 52) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Phillips County *** 136.5 (96.7, 189.0) 26 (1, 58) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Yuma County *** 136.8 (109.1, 169.9) 25 (2, 55) 18 falling falling trend -7.6 (-11.2, -4.0)
Montrose County *** 137.5 (124.7, 151.5) 24 (7, 43) 93 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Montezuma County *** 139.0 (122.2, 157.7) 23 (5, 47) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Logan County *** 140.0 (121.4, 161.0) 22 (4, 48) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Mesa County *** 141.2 (133.9, 148.8) 21 (8, 33) 296 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Denver County *** 141.4 (137.3, 145.7) 20 (11, 29) 916 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
El Paso County *** 141.7 (137.7, 145.9) 19 (11, 29) 959 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Jackson County *** 142.2 (80.3, 244.9) 18 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Huerfano County *** 143.4 (116.1, 178.2) 17 (2, 52) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Las Animas County *** 144.7 (123.2, 169.5) 16 (3, 47) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lincoln County *** 144.9 (108.9, 190.4) 15 (1, 55) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Rio Blanco County *** 145.1 (107.9, 191.4) 14 (1, 55) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Fremont County *** 146.2 (133.8, 159.6) 13 (4, 35) 107 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Crowley County *** 146.9 (107.1, 198.1) 12 (1, 56) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Otero County *** 147.1 (127.2, 169.6) 11 (3, 43) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Adams County 8 *** 148.0 (142.6, 153.5) 10 (6, 24) 609 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Pueblo County *** 149.2 (142.0, 156.7) 9 (5, 25) 336 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Washington County *** 149.8 (113.3, 196.4) 8 (1, 54) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Morgan County *** 161.1 (142.4, 181.7) 7 (1, 29) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Bent County *** 162.0 (124.6, 208.8) 6 (1, 50) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Delta County *** 167.6 (150.9, 185.8) 5 (1, 21) 86 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Baca County *** 169.8 (126.3, 227.1) 4 (1, 51) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Prowers County *** 178.0 (149.2, 211.1) 3 (1, 27) 28 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Kiowa County *** 182.1 (111.9, 290.7) 2 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Cheyenne County *** 210.4 (137.6, 312.8) 1 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/17/2021 11:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top