Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado No 440.4 (435.8, 444.9) N/A 7,542 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Cheyenne County No 910.9 (624.1, 1,283.1) 1 (1, 25) 7 stable stable trend 19.0 (-3.0, 46.1)
Baca County No 631.6 (479.1, 819.0) 2 (1, 41) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Jackson County No 623.9 (376.1, 972.8) 3 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Prowers County No 605.3 (507.4, 716.8) 4 (1, 27) 28 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Bent County No 555.8 (424.9, 714.8) 5 (1, 48) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Sedgwick County No 548.8 (377.3, 775.3) 6 (1, 57) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Huerfano County No 541.7 (442.7, 656.7) 7 (1, 44) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Otero County No 537.3 (465.5, 617.2) 8 (2, 35) 42 stable stable trend 9.1 (-1.1, 20.3)
Morgan County No 533.4 (470.9, 601.9) 9 (2, 30) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Delta County No 527.2 (477.1, 581.2) 10 (3, 29) 84 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Lincoln County No 516.1 (388.7, 672.0) 11 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Washington County No 515.5 (388.4, 671.7) 12 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Fremont County No 507.3 (464.9, 552.7) 13 (4, 31) 108 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Crowley County No 506.9 (366.8, 682.8) 14 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Pueblo County No 504.7 (480.5, 529.8) 15 (7, 26) 334 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Moffat County No 503.2 (410.1, 610.8) 16 (2, 48) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Rio Grande County No 499.9 (410.9, 602.4) 17 (2, 46) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Logan County No 487.1 (422.0, 559.5) 18 (4, 45) 42 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Rio Blanco County No 487.0 (360.7, 642.4) 19 (2, 55) 10
*
*
Adams County 8 No 485.4 (467.0, 504.2) 20 (10, 29) 567 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Kiowa County No 480.5 (268.9, 794.6) 21 (1, 61) 3
*
*
El Paso County No 479.9 (465.9, 494.1) 22 (12, 28) 937 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Yuma County No 477.6 (382.6, 588.9) 23 (2, 52) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Denver County No 471.0 (456.7, 485.6) 24 (14, 31) 857 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Mesa County No 463.1 (439.0, 488.2) 25 (13, 35) 285 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Las Animas County No 460.5 (391.8, 538.1) 26 (5, 49) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Weld County 8 No 459.1 (438.0, 480.9) 27 (15, 35) 378 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Alamosa County No 448.3 (365.4, 544.4) 28 (5, 53) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Conejos County No 442.8 (345.9, 559.0) 29 (4, 57) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Montezuma County No 437.3 (384.2, 495.7) 30 (8, 49) 51 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Saguache County No 435.6 (329.9, 564.0) 31 (3, 57) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Montrose County No 435.5 (395.3, 478.9) 32 (14, 46) 89 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Jefferson County 8 No 431.0 (418.0, 444.3) 33 (24, 40) 867 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Arapahoe County No 429.1 (415.4, 443.1) 34 (24, 41) 780 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Garfield County No 420.7 (375.9, 469.3) 35 (15, 50) 70 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
San Miguel County No 415.5 (275.8, 594.9) 36 (2, 61) 8
*
*
Larimer County No 411.8 (395.0, 429.2) 37 (28, 45) 470 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Elbert County No 410.4 (347.9, 480.4) 38 (11, 54) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Broomfield County 8 No 405.5 (366.7, 447.2) 39 (20, 51) 82 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.4, -1.9)
Dolores County No 405.4 (247.8, 626.9) 40 (2, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Chaffee County No 405.1 (349.0, 467.7) 41 (14, 54) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Boulder County 8 No 402.7 (384.8, 421.3) 42 (30, 47) 397 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Teller County No 383.5 (326.0, 447.8) 43 (18, 56) 40 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -1.9)
Douglas County No 374.9 (356.1, 394.5) 44 (36, 52) 323 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
La Plata County No 372.6 (333.7, 414.7) 45 (30, 55) 73 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Custer County No 368.9 (268.6, 494.7) 46 (7, 61) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.4)
Gunnison County No 355.7 (276.4, 449.9) 47 (17, 59) 16 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Phillips County No 345.4 (243.1, 478.6) 48 (9, 61) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Clear Creek County No 344.4 (259.4, 447.7) 49 (15, 61) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Gilpin County No 342.3 (215.8, 511.6) 50 (5, 61) 7
*
*
Kit Carson County No 342.2 (253.9, 451.6) 51 (14, 61) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Archuleta County No 329.8 (268.0, 401.7) 52 (30, 60) 23 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
Lake County No 323.7 (220.2, 457.8) 53 (12, 61) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Grand County No 323.5 (250.1, 410.5) 54 (25, 61) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Costilla County No 323.4 (217.7, 462.8) 55 (10, 61) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Routt County No 321.4 (262.5, 389.0) 56 (35, 60) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Park County No 300.1 (238.8, 371.9) 57 (36, 61) 24 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Ouray County No 290.0 (195.1, 414.1) 58 (22, 61) 7 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.8)
Eagle County No 234.0 (194.0, 279.5) 59 (53, 61) 30 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.9, -2.7)
Pitkin County No 232.9 (183.2, 291.8) 60 (51, 61) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Summit County No 216.7 (166.3, 276.9) 61 (53, 61) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.3)
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 7:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top