Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado N/A No 433.7 (429.3, 438.1) N/A 7,685 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.4)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Adams County 8 Urban No 475.9 (458.1, 494.2) 21 (12, 30) 578 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Alamosa County Rural No 432.3 (354.1, 522.8) 30 (7, 55) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Arapahoe County Urban No 416.5 (403.3, 430.0) 34 (27, 42) 786 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Archuleta County Rural No 347.2 (283.8, 420.6) 51 (24, 59) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.3, 0.0)
Baca County Rural No 704.2 (537.2, 908.5) 2 (1, 31) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Bent County Rural No 410.9 (300.8, 548.7) 36 (4, 59) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Boulder County 8 Urban No 389.8 (372.7, 407.6) 42 (32, 50) 402 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Broomfield County 8 Urban No 366.7 (332.1, 403.8) 46 (31, 55) 84 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.9, -3.2)
Chaffee County Rural No 403.9 (346.8, 467.8) 38 (15, 54) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.1)
Cheyenne County Rural No 810.9 (546.5, 1,160.2) 1 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Clear Creek County Urban No 296.1 (222.3, 386.6) 57 (28, 61) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Conejos County Rural No 502.8 (393.9, 632.9) 17 (2, 53) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Costilla County Rural No 269.5 (170.0, 407.1) 58 (21, 61) 5 falling falling trend -4.9 (-25.1, -1.7)
Crowley County Rural No 463.1 (327.4, 635.5) 25 (2, 58) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Custer County Rural No 342.6 (248.6, 461.4) 52 (13, 61) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.1)
Delta County Rural No 529.4 (479.3, 583.5) 9 (3, 28) 87 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Denver County Urban No 457.3 (443.2, 471.7) 27 (16, 33) 824 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.8, -1.6)
Dolores County Rural No 326.7 (198.7, 509.3) 55 (6, 61) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.2)
Douglas County Urban No 380.1 (362.5, 398.3) 44 (34, 52) 371 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Eagle County Rural No 234.9 (196.8, 277.9) 59 (54, 61) 33 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.3, -2.2)
El Paso County Urban No 464.5 (451.2, 478.2) 24 (15, 31) 956 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Elbert County Urban No 396.9 (337.7, 463.0) 39 (16, 55) 37 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.1)
Fremont County Rural No 497.2 (455.9, 541.4) 18 (6, 32) 109 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Garfield County Rural No 395.0 (352.5, 441.1) 40 (22, 53) 68 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Gilpin County Urban No 359.2 (229.6, 531.6) 48 (5, 61) 7
*
*
Grand County Rural No 331.7 (260.3, 415.8) 53 (27, 60) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.7, 0.0)
Gunnison County Rural No 356.1 (278.8, 447.9) 49 (16, 59) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.2)
Huerfano County Rural No 593.1 (489.2, 713.2) 5 (1, 30) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 667.6 (403.8, 1,036.8) 3 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 8 Urban No 426.2 (413.4, 439.3) 32 (25, 39) 870 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Kiowa County Rural No 518.5 (272.6, 884.0) 12 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Kit Carson County Rural No 365.3 (273.5, 478.7) 47 (12, 60) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
La Plata County Rural No 380.6 (342.2, 422.2) 43 (27, 55) 78 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Lake County Rural No 311.3 (203.6, 453.1) 56 (13, 61) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Larimer County Urban No 405.6 (389.3, 422.5) 37 (28, 46) 482 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Las Animas County Rural No 527.7 (455.8, 608.1) 10 (3, 35) 40 stable stable trend 8.9 (-0.5, 15.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 562.7 (430.2, 723.5) 6 (1, 50) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 12.5)
Logan County Rural No 449.5 (386.3, 520.0) 29 (7, 49) 38 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Mesa County Urban No 462.3 (438.6, 487.1) 26 (14, 33) 292 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Moffat County Rural No 482.4 (392.4, 586.7) 20 (3, 52) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Montezuma County Rural No 468.6 (413.0, 529.5) 23 (7, 46) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Montrose County Rural No 390.9 (353.9, 430.9) 41 (26, 53) 84 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Morgan County Rural No 512.0 (450.3, 579.8) 15 (3, 36) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Otero County Rural No 534.3 (463.3, 613.2) 8 (3, 32) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Ouray County Rural No 353.7 (249.5, 485.9) 50 (10, 61) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.5, 0.6)
Park County Urban No 372.5 (302.7, 453.0) 45 (16, 58) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.8)
Phillips County Rural No 416.6 (305.0, 558.2) 33 (4, 59) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Pitkin County Rural No 228.6 (180.5, 285.6) 60 (53, 61) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -0.8)
Prowers County Rural No 626.2 (525.3, 741.2) 4 (1, 23) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Pueblo County Urban No 534.4 (509.4, 560.2) 7 (5, 20) 354 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
Rio Blanco County Rural No 495.4 (369.4, 650.0) 19 (2, 55) 11
*
*
Rio Grande County Rural No 514.4 (424.7, 617.3) 14 (3, 44) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Routt County Rural No 328.4 (270.8, 394.2) 54 (30, 59) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.3)
Saguache County Rural No 503.4 (385.3, 645.6) 16 (2, 54) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.9)
San Miguel County Rural No 426.6 (293.5, 594.7) 31 (3, 60) 8
*
*
Sedgwick County Rural No 515.7 (352.6, 732.4) 13 (1, 57) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.4)
Summit County Rural No 228.4 (176.4, 289.8) 61 (53, 61) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.4, 0.1)
Teller County Urban No 414.7 (357.1, 478.7) 35 (13, 54) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.3)
Washington County Rural No 526.5 (397.0, 685.5) 11 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Weld County 8 Urban No 451.8 (431.5, 472.8) 28 (16, 35) 393 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Yuma County Rural No 475.8 (381.2, 586.9) 22 (3, 53) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/06/2024 1:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top