Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado N/A No 775.3 (766.4, 784.2) N/A 6,024 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Jackson County Rural No 1,280.4 (753.2, 2,028.8) 1 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural No 1,273.7 (795.7, 1,928.7) 2 (1, 54) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.1)
Baca County Rural No 1,231.3 (922.9, 1,610.3) 3 (1, 36) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,098.1 (824.6, 1,432.9) 4 (1, 45) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.2)
Huerfano County Rural No 1,080.1 (882.9, 1,307.8) 5 (1, 31) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.5)
Prowers County Rural No 1,028.6 (839.7, 1,247.2) 6 (1, 35) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Rio Blanco County Rural No 972.5 (710.3, 1,298.6) 7 (1, 54) 9
*
*
Conejos County Rural No 940.9 (719.9, 1,207.8) 8 (1, 51) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Delta County Rural No 936.3 (841.6, 1,038.7) 9 (3, 28) 73 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Pueblo County Urban No 915.0 (867.1, 964.8) 10 (6, 21) 279 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
Sedgwick County Rural No 899.6 (609.6, 1,280.6) 11 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.4)
Saguache County Rural No 896.3 (659.0, 1,188.1) 12 (1, 55) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.6)
Las Animas County Rural No 894.7 (757.3, 1,049.6) 13 (3, 44) 31 rising rising trend 12.3 (1.4, 18.6)
Washington County Rural No 893.5 (650.2, 1,197.6) 14 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Rio Grande County Rural No 882.2 (716.4, 1,074.8) 15 (3, 49) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Moffat County Rural No 875.5 (694.1, 1,089.2) 16 (2, 51) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
San Miguel County Rural No 875.1 (589.3, 1,245.0) 17 (1, 57) 7
*
*
Otero County Rural No 873.9 (744.5, 1,019.3) 18 (4, 45) 33 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Fremont County Rural No 866.8 (786.9, 952.6) 19 (6, 35) 88 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Morgan County Rural No 865.4 (746.8, 997.5) 20 (5, 45) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Adams County 8 Urban No 848.6 (812.3, 886.2) 21 (11, 29) 429 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Mesa County Urban No 831.4 (784.7, 880.1) 22 (11, 33) 242 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
El Paso County Urban No 814.4 (787.7, 841.7) 23 (15, 33) 726 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Denver County Urban No 809.3 (781.0, 838.3) 24 (16, 33) 641 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.4, -1.1)
Weld County 8 Urban No 804.5 (763.5, 847.1) 25 (14, 36) 300 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Crowley County Rural No 794.5 (529.2, 1,145.5) 26 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Logan County Rural No 793.9 (671.4, 932.3) 27 (6, 51) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Yuma County Rural No 776.1 (602.4, 984.0) 28 (4, 56) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Montezuma County Rural No 775.7 (671.6, 891.2) 29 (9, 51) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Jefferson County 8 Urban No 766.5 (740.8, 792.9) 30 (22, 39) 691 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Phillips County Rural No 758.1 (545.4, 1,029.5) 31 (3, 58) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Arapahoe County Urban No 751.9 (725.1, 779.4) 32 (24, 42) 616 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Alamosa County Rural No 743.4 (590.8, 923.1) 33 (6, 56) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.4)
Garfield County Rural No 740.4 (652.6, 836.6) 34 (14, 52) 55 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.1, -1.2)
Chaffee County Rural No 733.0 (621.3, 858.8) 35 (11, 53) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Larimer County Urban No 732.1 (699.4, 765.8) 36 (25, 46) 391 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Teller County Urban No 724.6 (608.7, 855.8) 37 (10, 54) 34 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.3)
Gilpin County Urban No 709.0 (433.1, 1,091.8) 38 (2, 60) 5
*
*
Douglas County Urban No 707.9 (671.3, 746.0) 39 (28, 50) 292 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.1)
Boulder County 8 Urban No 703.4 (668.8, 739.2) 40 (29, 50) 321 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.0)
Montrose County Rural No 701.7 (630.2, 779.1) 41 (23, 53) 71 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Elbert County Urban No 698.4 (578.5, 835.4) 42 (12, 56) 26 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.0)
La Plata County Rural No 688.8 (611.5, 773.0) 43 (22, 54) 62 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Bent County Rural No 677.4 (473.2, 940.1) 44 (5, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Broomfield County 8 Urban No 664.8 (595.2, 740.2) 45 (27, 54) 68 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.2, -2.7)
Archuleta County Rural No 656.7 (527.2, 808.0) 46 (14, 57) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.8)
Dolores County Rural No 656.6 (387.8, 1,040.7) 47 (3, 60) 4
*
*
Gunnison County Rural No 652.1 (494.3, 843.8) 48 (11, 59) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -0.8)
Park County Urban No 649.5 (507.3, 818.5) 49 (13, 58) 20
*
*
Grand County Rural No 649.4 (498.6, 830.4) 50 (11, 59) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.8)
Kit Carson County Rural No 623.1 (452.6, 836.7) 51 (12, 60) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Custer County Rural No 617.1 (429.3, 856.9) 52 (8, 60) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.1)
Ouray County Rural No 595.1 (393.6, 859.0) 53 (8, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.8)
Routt County Rural No 592.7 (475.4, 729.7) 54 (26, 59) 21 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.3)
Lake County Rural No 506.7 (296.7, 801.4) 55 (13, 60) 4
*
*
Clear Creek County Urban No 506.6 (358.8, 695.2) 56 (26, 60) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Costilla County Rural No 477.1 (289.3, 741.2) 57 (19, 60) 4 falling falling trend -6.2 (-15.5, -3.0)
Eagle County Rural No 435.4 (355.9, 526.8) 58 (50, 60) 25 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.7, -2.3)
Pitkin County Rural No 426.7 (329.0, 544.1) 59 (50, 60) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -0.8)
Summit County Rural No 397.5 (290.6, 528.7) 60 (51, 60) 12
*
*
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top