Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado No 152.8 (150.6, 154.9) N/A 4,192 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Yuma County No 152.5 (112.1, 203.7) 28 (3, 52) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Weld County 8 No 156.5 (146.9, 166.6) 25 (15, 37) 216 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Washington County No 177.9 (122.9, 253.1) 14 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Teller County No 135.2 (107.7, 167.9) 41 (13, 52) 23 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Summit County Yes 60.5 (41.9, 84.3) 58 (49, 58) 9
*
*
Sedgwick County No 212.5 (123.5, 351.6) 5 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
San Miguel County No 143.2 (84.7, 223.6) 34 (2, 58) 5
*
*
Saguache County No 147.5 (102.0, 210.1) 32 (3, 55) 8
*
*
Routt County Yes 107.8 (82.6, 138.3) 48 (29, 57) 15 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Rio Grande County No 203.9 (160.2, 256.9) 7 (1, 38) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Rio Blanco County No 181.4 (123.4, 257.9) 13 (1, 53) 7
*
*
Pueblo County No 186.2 (174.4, 198.7) 12 (5, 20) 192 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Prowers County No 196.5 (152.1, 250.2) 11 (1, 42) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Pitkin County Yes 77.0 (56.0, 104.4) 56 (44, 58) 10 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.8)
Phillips County No 142.4 (87.4, 223.0) 36 (2, 58) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Park County Yes 91.5 (67.6, 122.2) 52 (37, 58) 14 falling falling trend -11.3 (-19.1, -2.8)
Ouray County Yes 91.6 (54.2, 154.8) 51 (20, 58) 4
*
*
Otero County No 204.3 (168.8, 245.7) 6 (1, 33) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Morgan County No 203.0 (172.5, 237.4) 8 (1, 27) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Montrose County No 164.2 (144.4, 186.5) 21 (8, 39) 53 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Montezuma County No 166.1 (140.2, 195.9) 20 (6, 43) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Moffat County No 196.6 (151.1, 251.5) 10 (1, 43) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Mesa County No 158.1 (147.0, 170.0) 24 (14, 37) 155 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Logan County No 176.5 (145.8, 211.9) 16 (3, 41) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Lincoln County No 154.8 (103.3, 224.6) 26 (2, 55) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Las Animas County No 174.4 (139.4, 216.6) 17 (2, 45) 19 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Larimer County No 147.1 (139.0, 155.5) 33 (22, 40) 264 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Lake County Yes 118.1 (72.0, 181.9) 44 (6, 58) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.5)
La Plata County No 137.3 (118.9, 157.8) 38 (19, 49) 45 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Kit Carson County Yes 105.7 (68.6, 157.7) 50 (15, 58) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.0)
Jefferson County 8 No 150.6 (144.4, 157.0) 29 (21, 38) 474 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Huerfano County No 214.0 (166.8, 276.2) 3 (1, 38) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Gunnison County Yes 114.9 (81.4, 157.1) 45 (16, 57) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -1.8)
Grand County Yes 114.9 (82.6, 155.7) 46 (16, 57) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Gilpin County Yes 89.3 (48.7, 154.3) 53 (16, 58) 4
*
*
Garfield County No 149.7 (128.8, 172.9) 31 (11, 46) 42 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Fremont County No 176.5 (157.4, 197.4) 15 (5, 33) 65 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Elbert County No 142.5 (113.6, 176.5) 35 (9, 51) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
El Paso County No 168.5 (161.8, 175.4) 19 (11, 27) 520 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Eagle County Yes 70.0 (54.2, 88.7) 57 (49, 58) 18 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.9, -2.6)
Douglas County No 124.4 (115.8, 133.5) 43 (34, 49) 174 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Denver County No 162.9 (156.1, 169.8) 23 (13, 31) 467 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -1.5)
Delta County No 213.5 (187.5, 242.6) 4 (1, 18) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Custer County Yes 88.9 (53.2, 150.2) 54 (22, 58) 5
*
*
Crowley County No 138.3 (86.1, 213.1) 37 (2, 58) 5
*
*
Costilla County Yes 107.3 (60.1, 185.2) 49 (8, 58) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.1)
Conejos County No 153.8 (110.4, 210.3) 27 (3, 53) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Clear Creek County Yes 87.1 (56.5, 130.5) 55 (33, 58) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
Cheyenne County No 297.2 (172.9, 484.8) 1 (1, 49) 4
*
*
Chaffee County No 134.6 (110.1, 164.0) 42 (14, 52) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Broomfield County 8 No 136.6 (118.1, 156.9) 39 (19, 49) 42 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.0)
Boulder County 8 No 135.3 (126.9, 144.1) 40 (29, 46) 208 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Bent County No 201.7 (144.5, 277.1) 9 (1, 47) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Baca County No 217.2 (149.2, 312.9) 2 (1, 47) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Archuleta County Yes 111.7 (83.2, 148.4) 47 (22, 57) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Arapahoe County No 150.1 (143.5, 156.9) 30 (21, 38) 423 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Alamosa County No 170.3 (129.6, 219.5) 18 (2, 48) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Adams County 8 No 163.1 (154.6, 172.0) 22 (13, 32) 309 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Dolores County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2022 2:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top