Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado N/A No 150.3 (148.2, 152.4) N/A 4,247 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Cheyenne County Rural No 264.9 (153.2, 438.8) 1 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Lake County Rural Yes 102.6 (56.8, 168.5) 52 (8, 57) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.6)
Sedgwick County Rural No 167.2 (95.2, 287.7) 21 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.0)
Crowley County Rural Yes 107.6 (62.5, 176.1) 49 (8, 57) 4
*
*
Gilpin County Urban No 124.5 (67.4, 211.1) 45 (2, 57) 4
*
*
Custer County Rural Yes 105.3 (60.3, 179.6) 51 (8, 57) 5
*
*
Ouray County Rural Yes 121.6 (74.3, 195.9) 47 (4, 57) 5
*
*
Phillips County Rural No 156.1 (99.7, 236.8) 26 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
San Miguel County Rural No 139.4 (85.3, 213.6) 35 (2, 57) 5
*
*
Clear Creek County Urban Yes 70.4 (44.3, 109.0) 57 (46, 57) 6 falling falling trend -14.4 (-46.0, -2.6)
Bent County Rural No 141.6 (95.7, 205.4) 34 (3, 56) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
Kit Carson County Rural No 126.1 (85.8, 181.2) 44 (9, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.4)
Washington County Rural No 174.9 (119.7, 250.6) 16 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Rio Blanco County Rural No 178.8 (123.3, 251.9) 12 (1, 52) 7
*
*
Baca County Rural No 244.2 (171.4, 345.0) 2 (1, 37) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Lincoln County Rural No 210.3 (148.1, 291.1) 4 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.8)
Gunnison County Rural Yes 106.4 (74.9, 146.2) 50 (19, 57) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.5)
Conejos County Rural No 169.0 (121.5, 230.7) 18 (1, 52) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Saguache County Rural No 177.4 (124.9, 247.8) 13 (1, 51) 9
*
*
Pitkin County Rural Yes 71.5 (51.9, 97.4) 56 (48, 57) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.2)
Yuma County Rural No 161.5 (119.5, 214.3) 24 (2, 52) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Summit County Rural Yes 72.7 (51.5, 99.1) 55 (47, 57) 11
*
*
Grand County Rural Yes 114.2 (83.9, 152.4) 48 (18, 56) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 1.0)
Alamosa County Rural No 175.4 (135.1, 223.9) 15 (1, 48) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Archuleta County Rural No 134.3 (102.1, 175.0) 38 (8, 53) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 1.2)
Moffat County Rural No 196.1 (151.4, 249.9) 7 (1, 43) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.7)
Huerfano County Rural No 216.7 (166.9, 281.9) 3 (1, 36) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.8)
Prowers County Rural No 206.4 (161.8, 260.2) 6 (1, 38) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Rio Grande County Rural No 193.2 (151.2, 244.3) 9 (1, 42) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Routt County Rural Yes 102.5 (78.9, 131.3) 53 (33, 56) 15 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.3)
Park County Urban Yes 121.7 (91.9, 158.7) 46 (15, 55) 17 stable stable trend 6.1 (-5.5, 25.4)
Eagle County Rural Yes 76.5 (60.5, 95.1) 54 (48, 57) 20 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.7, -1.4)
Elbert County Urban No 127.6 (101.7, 158.3) 43 (15, 53) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.2)
Las Animas County Rural No 180.5 (145.6, 222.4) 11 (2, 43) 21 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Chaffee County Rural No 136.2 (110.7, 166.9) 37 (13, 52) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2)
Logan County Rural No 167.9 (137.3, 203.5) 20 (3, 46) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Otero County Rural No 207.0 (171.2, 248.7) 5 (1, 30) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Teller County Urban No 133.7 (108.3, 164.0) 39 (14, 52) 26 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.2)
Morgan County Rural No 169.4 (142.0, 200.8) 17 (4, 45) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Montezuma County Rural No 176.1 (149.2, 207.0) 14 (3, 41) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Garfield County Rural No 147.6 (126.6, 170.8) 31 (12, 48) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Broomfield County 8 Urban No 131.3 (114.3, 150.0) 41 (22, 50) 45 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.2)
La Plata County Rural No 136.8 (118.7, 157.1) 36 (17, 50) 46 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.1)
Montrose County Rural No 148.6 (130.1, 169.3) 29 (13, 47) 50 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.6)
Delta County Rural No 191.0 (166.9, 218.1) 10 (2, 26) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Fremont County Rural No 168.6 (150.1, 189.1) 19 (6, 37) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Mesa County Urban No 159.7 (148.6, 171.5) 25 (12, 35) 162 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Pueblo County Urban No 195.1 (182.9, 208.0) 8 (3, 17) 201 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Douglas County Urban No 133.2 (124.7, 142.1) 40 (30, 48) 204 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 7.2)
Boulder County 8 Urban No 130.8 (122.7, 139.2) 42 (31, 48) 210 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 2.5)
Weld County 8 Urban No 152.7 (143.4, 162.5) 28 (16, 38) 219 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Larimer County Urban No 145.9 (138.0, 154.2) 33 (22, 41) 272 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Adams County 8 Urban No 163.5 (155.1, 172.3) 22 (13, 31) 319 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Arapahoe County Urban No 146.0 (139.5, 152.6) 32 (23, 41) 423 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Denver County Urban No 155.8 (149.2, 162.7) 27 (16, 34) 444 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -2.1)
Jefferson County 8 Urban No 148.1 (142.0, 154.5) 30 (21, 40) 474 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
El Paso County Urban No 161.5 (155.1, 168.1) 23 (14, 30) 521 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Costilla County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 3:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top