Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado Yes 113.1 (111.4, 114.7) N/A 3,769 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Cheyenne County No 245.1 (135.6, 419.2) 1 (1, 49) 3
*
*
Crowley County No 190.7 (114.6, 304.7) 2 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Baca County No 168.6 (107.5, 260.5) 3 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Prowers County No 166.6 (129.4, 212.2) 4 (1, 32) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Custer County No 149.9 (92.1, 238.4) 5 (1, 53) 7
*
*
Yuma County No 144.2 (103.4, 196.4) 6 (1, 48) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Lincoln County No 140.4 (92.5, 209.5) 7 (1, 53) 6 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Morgan County No 136.5 (113.0, 163.7) 8 (2, 40) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Logan County No 130.1 (104.1, 161.4) 9 (2, 47) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Pueblo County No 128.5 (119.4, 138.2) 10 (6, 26) 160 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Adams County 8 No 126.3 (119.8, 133.1) 11 (7, 27) 295 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Washington County No 125.0 (77.6, 195.4) 12 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Fremont County No 124.4 (107.8, 143.5) 13 (5, 41) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
El Paso County No 123.6 (118.6, 128.7) 14 (9, 27) 477 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Sedgwick County No 122.8 (69.3, 223.5) 15 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Delta County Yes 122.6 (103.1, 145.4) 16 (4, 44) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Clear Creek County Yes 120.5 (81.5, 173.6) 17 (2, 54) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Otero County Yes 120.5 (96.2, 149.9) 18 (4, 49) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Denver County Yes 120.3 (115.2, 125.5) 19 (10, 30) 444 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Mesa County Yes 119.6 (110.6, 129.2) 20 (9, 36) 139 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Huerfano County Yes 119.5 (78.4, 179.8) 21 (2, 54) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Rio Blanco County Yes 118.7 (72.6, 184.1) 22 (2, 55) 4
*
*
Conejos County Yes 116.3 (79.0, 167.0) 23 (2, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Weld County 8 Yes 116.0 (108.5, 123.9) 24 (11, 37) 184 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Las Animas County Yes 114.1 (88.7, 146.6) 25 (4, 51) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Teller County Yes 111.7 (88.7, 139.6) 26 (5, 50) 21 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Jefferson County 8 Yes 111.2 (106.5, 116.1) 27 (19, 39) 437 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Montrose County Yes 110.7 (94.8, 128.9) 28 (8, 48) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Gilpin County Yes 110.3 (56.1, 194.0) 29 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Broomfield County 8 Yes 109.9 (96.0, 125.4) 30 (9, 47) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Arapahoe County Yes 109.9 (105.0, 114.9) 31 (20, 40) 405 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Boulder County 8 Yes 108.0 (101.4, 114.9) 32 (20, 43) 210 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Moffat County Yes 107.6 (76.9, 147.0) 33 (4, 54) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Gunnison County Yes 106.5 (75.3, 146.4) 34 (4, 54) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Chaffee County Yes 106.0 (83.9, 133.7) 35 (6, 52) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
San Miguel County Yes 105.5 (54.7, 180.5) 36 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Larimer County Yes 104.6 (98.5, 111.0) 37 (22, 45) 231 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Garfield County Yes 104.1 (88.3, 122.0) 38 (11, 50) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Saguache County Yes 101.7 (64.5, 156.3) 39 (3, 55) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.8)
Rio Grande County Yes 101.6 (71.4, 141.4) 40 (5, 55) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Alamosa County Yes 101.5 (73.7, 136.7) 41 (5, 54) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Montezuma County Yes 100.6 (81.4, 123.7) 42 (9, 52) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Elbert County Yes 100.4 (78.1, 127.4) 43 (8, 54) 16 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.9)
Douglas County Yes 100.2 (93.4, 107.3) 44 (26, 48) 171 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Bent County Yes 99.2 (58.9, 166.2) 45 (3, 55) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Phillips County Yes 98.5 (56.8, 165.1) 46 (3, 55) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Archuleta County Yes 92.2 (67.5, 124.9) 47 (8, 55) 11
*
*
La Plata County Yes 89.7 (75.9, 105.6) 48 (26, 53) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Kit Carson County Yes 86.4 (55.5, 131.7) 49 (6, 55) 5
*
*
Routt County Yes 81.9 (60.1, 109.2) 50 (20, 55) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Park County Yes 80.9 (57.1, 112.5) 51 (14, 55) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.1)
Grand County Yes 73.1 (48.0, 107.1) 52 (19, 55) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.3)
Eagle County Yes 70.2 (54.1, 89.3) 53 (40, 55) 16 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.2)
Summit County Yes 67.8 (46.8, 94.7) 54 (32, 55) 9
*
*
Pitkin County Yes 56.7 (38.8, 81.2) 55 (45, 55) 7
*
*
Costilla County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/05/2023 12:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top