Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Colorado by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | N/A | Yes | 111.6 (110.0, 113.2) | N/A | 3,839 |
falling 
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.3) |
| United States | N/A | No | 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) | N/A | 285,526 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.4, -1.1) |
| Baca County | Rural | No | 179.5 (113.1, 277.5) | 1 (1, 48) | 6 |
stable 
|
0.8 (-1.0, 7.2) |
| Las Animas County | Rural | No | 136.4 (110.0, 169.4) | 9 (1, 42) | 20 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.7, 1.3) |
| Prowers County | Rural | No | 164.4 (126.2, 211.5) | 3 (1, 32) | 14 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.9, 1.1) |
| Morgan County | Rural | No | 146.4 (121.5, 175.0) | 6 (1, 32) | 27 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.7, 0.7) |
| Delta County | Rural | No | 129.6 (110.6, 151.7) | 12 (3, 37) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
| Huerfano County | Rural | No | 153.5 (109.0, 215.2) | 4 (1, 47) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.1, 1.8) |
| Yuma County | Rural | No | 131.2 (93.4, 180.3) | 10 (1, 51) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.8, 0.9) |
| Logan County | Rural | Yes | 115.9 (91.3, 146.0) | 23 (3, 49) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.2) |
| Moffat County | Rural | Yes | 105.7 (75.0, 145.3) | 33 (3, 53) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.6) |
| Pueblo County | Urban | No | 136.6 (127.3, 146.5) | 8 (3, 20) | 171 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.1, -0.2) |
| Conejos County | Rural | No | 142.5 (98.5, 201.3) | 7 (1, 50) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.4, 0.9) |
| Otero County | Rural | No | 125.3 (100.6, 155.1) | 15 (3, 46) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.9, 0.1) |
| El Paso County | Urban | Yes | 120.8 (116.0, 125.8) | 18 (11, 29) | 490 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
| Montezuma County | Rural | Yes | 103.8 (84.6, 126.8) | 36 (10, 51) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Phillips County | Rural | No | 130.3 (79.8, 205.3) | 11 (1, 54) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.9, 1.0) |
| Rio Grande County | Rural | Yes | 115.0 (83.3, 156.1) | 27 (3, 52) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.2, 0.2) |
| Washington County | Rural | No | 149.5 (93.8, 229.7) | 5 (1, 53) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.0, 1.0) |
| Chaffee County | Rural | Yes | 99.7 (78.8, 126.2) | 40 (10, 52) | 17 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.4, 0.3) |
| Fremont County | Rural | No | 127.4 (111.0, 146.0) | 13 (4, 35) | 49 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Bent County | Rural | Yes | 101.1 (56.2, 174.3) | 37 (1, 54) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.5, 0.9) |
| Larimer County | Urban | Yes | 100.6 (94.7, 106.7) | 38 (27, 46) | 232 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.6, -0.9) |
| Alamosa County | Rural | Yes | 88.3 (63.8, 119.7) | 48 (11, 54) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.6, -0.2) |
| Lincoln County | Rural | No | 125.3 (81.0, 191.1) | 14 (1, 54) | 5 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.7, -0.1) |
| Mesa County | Urban | Yes | 115.5 (106.9, 124.8) | 24 (11, 37) | 140 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Denver County | Urban | Yes | 118.8 (113.7, 124.0) | 21 (11, 30) | 430 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-4.4, -1.2) |
| Gunnison County | Rural | Yes | 120.6 (88.0, 161.8) | 19 (2, 51) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-2.9, 0.3) |
| Grand County | Rural | Yes | 83.1 (56.3, 118.9) | 50 (12, 54) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.3, 0.5) |
| Jefferson County 8 | Urban | Yes | 109.8 (105.1, 114.6) | 30 (19, 38) | 437 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-1.9, -1.3) |
| Arapahoe County | Urban | Yes | 109.2 (104.5, 114.1) | 31 (21, 38) | 414 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-3.9, -1.3) |
| Boulder County 8 | Urban | Yes | 104.5 (98.1, 111.1) | 34 (23, 44) | 212 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.2, -1.2) |
| Garfield County | Rural | Yes | 100.1 (85.0, 117.3) | 39 (14, 50) | 33 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.4, -1.0) |
| La Plata County | Rural | Yes | 87.9 (74.7, 103.0) | 49 (28, 53) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.7, -0.6) |
| Weld County 8 | Urban | Yes | 115.5 (108.2, 123.1) | 25 (12, 35) | 194 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.3, -1.1) |
| Douglas County | Urban | Yes | 97.8 (91.5, 104.4) | 42 (28, 48) | 190 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.2, -1.1) |
| Teller County | Urban | Yes | 115.1 (92.6, 142.3) | 26 (4, 49) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-3.1, 0.0) |
| Park County | Urban | Yes | 99.0 (72.5, 133.4) | 41 (7, 54) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-3.6, 0.3) |
| Clear Creek County | Urban | Yes | 104.2 (71.7, 149.9) | 35 (3, 54) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.6, -0.2) |
| Routt County | Rural | Yes | 91.1 (68.7, 118.6) | 47 (12, 54) | 13 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-4.3, -0.8) |
| Elbert County | Urban | Yes | 105.9 (83.6, 132.8) | 32 (6, 51) | 18 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-4.2, -1.1) |
| Saguache County | Rural | Yes | 110.6 (70.7, 168.8) | 29 (1, 54) | 6 |
falling
|
-3.3 (-19.3, -0.8) |
| Eagle County | Rural | Yes | 65.8 (51.2, 83.0) | 53 (43, 54) | 16 |
falling
|
-3.6 (-4.7, -2.0) |
| Adams County 8 | Urban | Yes | 120.3 (114.0, 126.7) | 20 (11, 30) | 292 |
falling
|
-5.1 (-9.8, -1.4) |
| Broomfield County 8 | Urban | Yes | 94.8 (82.5, 108.4) | 45 (24, 51) | 44 |
falling
|
-5.2 (-10.2, -2.7) |
| Montrose County | Rural | Yes | 96.7 (82.3, 113.4) | 43 (18, 51) | 37 |
falling
|
-5.8 (-14.9, -1.4) |
| Archuleta County | Rural | Yes | 79.2 (56.7, 110.0) | 51 (19, 54) | 10 |
|
|
| Crowley County | Rural | No | 172.0 (104.1, 276.8) | 2 (1, 50) | 5 |
|
|
| Custer County | Rural | No | 123.1 (75.9, 198.1) | 16 (1, 54) | 6 |
|
|
| Kit Carson County | Rural | Yes | 92.2 (57.7, 142.3) | 46 (4, 54) | 5 |
|
|
| Ouray County | Rural | Yes | 96.5 (56.0, 164.2) | 44 (2, 54) | 4 |
|
|
| Pitkin County | Rural | Yes | 59.9 (41.6, 84.9) | 54 (42, 54) | 7 |
|
|
| Rio Blanco County | Rural | Yes | 113.5 (69.4, 176.7) | 28 (1, 54) | 4 |
|
|
| San Miguel County | Rural | Yes | 121.1 (68.7, 195.9) | 17 (1, 54) | 4 |
|
|
| Sedgwick County | Rural | Yes | 118.3 (69.2, 214.7) | 22 (1, 54) | 4 |
|
|
| Summit County | Rural | Yes | 66.5 (46.2, 92.3) | 52 (32, 54) | 9 |
|
|
| Cheyenne County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Costilla County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dolores County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gilpin County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hinsdale County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jackson County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kiowa County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lake County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mineral County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| San Juan County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/15/2025 5:47 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/15/2025 5:47 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.