Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado No 127.8 (123.9, 131.7) N/A 911 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
United States 6 Yes 108.2 (107.8, 108.7) N/A 41,779 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Prowers County No 187.5 (120.4, 275.1) 1 (1, 27) 5
*
*
Saguache County No 170.3 (100.8, 268.8) 2 (1, 28) 4
*
*
Rio Grande County No 166.4 (119.2, 226.0) 3 (1, 26) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Huerfano County No 159.1 (102.6, 239.8) 4 (1, 28) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Las Animas County No 157.6 (119.8, 204.5) 5 (1, 24) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Otero County No 156.2 (118.8, 201.6) 6 (1, 25) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Pueblo County No 152.1 (139.2, 165.9) 7 (2, 14) 106 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
La Plata County No 144.9 (100.0, 201.5) 8 (1, 28) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Denver County No 142.9 (133.5, 152.8) 9 (4, 16) 186 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Montrose County No 136.1 (93.6, 189.5) 10 (1, 29) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Weld County 8 No 131.9 (116.6, 148.6) 11 (4, 23) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
El Paso County No 131.2 (117.8, 145.5) 12 (5, 22) 78 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Boulder County 8 No 129.3 (107.3, 153.8) 13 (3, 26) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.3)
Jefferson County 8 No 126.3 (113.1, 140.4) 14 (7, 24) 74 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Costilla County No 125.5 (77.5, 197.1) 15 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Montezuma County No 123.3 (71.4, 197.1) 16 (1, 29) 3
*
*
Adams County 8 No 123.1 (113.1, 133.6) 17 (9, 24) 127 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Larimer County Yes 122.0 (100.3, 146.5) 18 (5, 27) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Conejos County Yes 118.2 (80.3, 169.4) 19 (2, 29) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Fremont County Yes 113.2 (72.2, 167.9) 20 (2, 29) 5
*
*
Morgan County Yes 113.0 (77.3, 158.1) 21 (3, 29) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.2)
Mesa County Yes 111.0 (86.9, 139.2) 22 (7, 29) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Broomfield County 8 Yes 108.9 (63.1, 170.8) 23 (2, 29) 4
*
*
Garfield County Yes 108.6 (66.6, 163.2) 24 (2, 29) 6
*
*
Delta County Yes 108.0 (61.7, 172.6) 25 (2, 29) 3
*
*
Alamosa County Yes 104.6 (70.8, 148.3) 26 (4, 29) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Arapahoe County Yes 103.3 (90.5, 117.1) 27 (16, 29) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Douglas County Yes 96.0 (72.6, 123.6) 28 (11, 29) 14
*
*
Eagle County Yes 76.0 (40.7, 125.1) 29 (9, 29) 4
*
*
Archuleta County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baca County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chaffee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elbert County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Park County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Routt County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summit County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Teller County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/04/2023 11:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top