Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado *** 132.2 (130.7, 133.6) N/A 6,460 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States 6 *** 157.2 (157.0, 157.4) N/A 465,073 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Cheyenne County *** 226.6 (147.3, 340.8) 1 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Kiowa County *** 193.3 (118.6, 310.8) 2 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Prowers County *** 181.1 (148.0, 221.0) 3 (1, 31) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Baca County *** 178.4 (131.0, 242.2) 4 (1, 49) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Delta County *** 173.6 (155.4, 193.7) 5 (1, 20) 81 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Morgan County *** 170.7 (148.9, 195.4) 6 (1, 28) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Bent County *** 167.1 (123.5, 226.5) 7 (1, 53) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Crowley County *** 160.2 (111.9, 226.7) 8 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Rio Blanco County *** 156.8 (116.4, 207.5) 9 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Adams County 8 *** 155.8 (149.2, 162.6) 10 (6, 21) 445 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Alamosa County *** 154.2 (119.8, 195.8) 11 (1, 51) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Phillips County *** 153.5 (105.0, 219.2) 12 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Fremont County *** 152.0 (138.6, 166.7) 13 (5, 33) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Lincoln County *** 151.6 (113.5, 200.7) 14 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Logan County *** 150.6 (129.9, 174.1) 15 (3, 42) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Pueblo County *** 149.2 (140.2, 158.7) 16 (6, 29) 223 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Jackson County *** 148.3 (83.6, 263.1) 17 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Yuma County *** 145.6 (114.6, 183.4) 18 (2, 52) 17 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.0, 0.6)
Montezuma County *** 145.2 (125.9, 167.3) 19 (5, 45) 48 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
El Paso County *** 144.3 (139.8, 148.9) 20 (12, 29) 810 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Mesa County *** 144.1 (136.4, 152.2) 21 (11, 32) 276 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Conejos County *** 144.0 (100.5, 202.0) 22 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Washington County *** 142.0 (105.6, 189.7) 23 (1, 55) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Rio Grande County *** 139.6 (108.6, 179.0) 24 (2, 53) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Moffat County *** 139.3 (112.0, 171.6) 25 (3, 52) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Huerfano County *** 138.6 (107.6, 184.3) 26 (2, 54) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Montrose County *** 137.4 (123.8, 152.4) 27 (9, 44) 85 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Las Animas County *** 136.8 (110.8, 169.3) 28 (4, 52) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Weld County 8 *** 136.3 (129.5, 143.3) 29 (16, 38) 318 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Denver County *** 135.5 (130.4, 140.7) 30 (18, 37) 575 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Otero County *** 135.4 (112.4, 163.0) 31 (5, 52) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Arapahoe County *** 131.4 (126.9, 136.1) 32 (21, 40) 660 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Broomfield County 8 *** 130.3 (117.7, 144.0) 33 (15, 48) 80 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.5, -3.6)
Garfield County *** 129.9 (115.8, 145.4) 34 (13, 48) 67 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Jefferson County 8 *** 129.9 (125.8, 134.1) 35 (23, 41) 805 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Gilpin County *** 126.1 (80.8, 187.4) 36 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Sedgwick County *** 126.1 (76.4, 206.0) 37 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Larimer County *** 125.6 (120.4, 131.1) 38 (27, 45) 453 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Elbert County *** 125.5 (105.8, 147.9) 39 (10, 53) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Chaffee County *** 121.7 (104.3, 142.1) 40 (15, 53) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Boulder County 8 *** 121.0 (115.4, 126.8) 41 (31, 48) 370 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Teller County *** 120.5 (101.8, 142.0) 42 (13, 54) 39 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Dolores County *** 118.2 (71.2, 196.5) 43 (2, 60) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Custer County *** 115.7 (81.8, 164.8) 44 (4, 59) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Douglas County *** 115.5 (109.5, 121.8) 45 (35, 51) 306 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
La Plata County *** 114.5 (102.0, 128.3) 46 (27, 54) 67 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Saguache County *** 113.3 (79.8, 161.7) 47 (6, 60) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Clear Creek County *** 103.9 (77.2, 138.0) 48 (15, 60) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
San Miguel County *** 103.8 (67.0, 152.9) 49 (5, 60) 7
*
*
Kit Carson County *** 103.4 (77.0, 138.2) 50 (13, 60) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Archuleta County *** 102.9 (82.1, 129.0) 51 (25, 59) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.8)
Grand County *** 102.0 (79.1, 129.8) 52 (21, 59) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Gunnison County *** 101.9 (79.0, 129.5) 53 (21, 59) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Routt County *** 97.6 (79.7, 118.3) 54 (32, 59) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.5)
Lake County *** 96.6 (61.8, 145.3) 55 (9, 60) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Park County *** 83.3 (65.7, 104.9) 56 (44, 60) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Ouray County *** 76.7 (50.1, 118.1) 57 (35, 60) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Pitkin County *** 74.8 (58.7, 94.7) 58 (49, 60) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.3)
Eagle County *** 74.0 (61.0, 88.8) 59 (51, 60) 29 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.8, -2.6)
Summit County *** 61.0 (46.8, 78.2) 60 (54, 60) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Costilla County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/21/2022 2:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2019) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top