Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado No 130.4 (129.0, 131.9) N/A 6,552 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.5)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
El Paso County No 143.6 (139.2, 148.2) 22 (14, 29) 831 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Jefferson County 8 No 127.7 (123.7, 131.8) 34 (25, 42) 807 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Arapahoe County No 129.6 (125.1, 134.2) 33 (24, 41) 663 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Denver County No 132.0 (127.1, 137.1) 31 (21, 40) 570 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Larimer County No 123.1 (118.0, 128.4) 39 (28, 46) 460 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Adams County 8 No 149.7 (143.3, 156.3) 21 (10, 27) 435 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Boulder County 8 Yes 119.8 (114.3, 125.5) 41 (31, 48) 378 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Weld County 8 No 136.0 (129.4, 142.9) 27 (17, 38) 331 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Douglas County Yes 112.3 (106.7, 118.2) 46 (37, 52) 318 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Mesa County No 139.7 (132.2, 147.7) 26 (15, 35) 275 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Pueblo County No 153.3 (144.3, 162.9) 19 (7, 26) 235 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Fremont County No 153.5 (140.1, 168.1) 18 (5, 30) 105 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Montrose County No 132.7 (119.5, 147.3) 29 (14, 46) 84 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Delta County No 168.8 (151.5, 187.9) 7 (2, 23) 83 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Broomfield County 8 No 124.5 (112.4, 137.6) 37 (20, 49) 80 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.7, -3.1)
La Plata County Yes 110.7 (98.6, 124.0) 47 (30, 55) 68 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Garfield County No 125.7 (112.0, 140.6) 35 (17, 50) 67 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Morgan County No 176.0 (153.9, 200.9) 5 (1, 23) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Montezuma County No 134.0 (116.1, 154.5) 28 (10, 48) 47 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Logan County No 157.5 (136.2, 181.7) 12 (3, 38) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Teller County Yes 122.6 (104.1, 143.9) 40 (14, 54) 41 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Chaffee County Yes 118.7 (101.6, 138.6) 43 (20, 54) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Elbert County No 125.5 (106.4, 147.2) 36 (12, 53) 36 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
Otero County No 156.6 (130.9, 187.0) 15 (2, 43) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Eagle County Yes 69.6 (57.4, 83.5) 58 (52, 60) 28 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.7)
Routt County Yes 98.4 (80.9, 118.6) 52 (31, 58) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Park County Yes 90.6 (72.2, 112.9) 56 (36, 60) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Prowers County No 187.3 (153.3, 228.0) 3 (1, 27) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Las Animas County No 132.3 (106.9, 164.3) 30 (6, 54) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Moffat County No 157.4 (127.8, 192.1) 13 (2, 46) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Archuleta County Yes 97.7 (78.0, 122.5) 53 (30, 59) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Yuma County No 157.4 (124.8, 196.8) 14 (2, 49) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Huerfano County No 168.4 (130.0, 221.5) 8 (1, 44) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Summit County Yes 65.4 (50.5, 83.4) 60 (53, 60) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Pitkin County Yes 69.4 (54.5, 87.9) 59 (51, 60) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.4)
Grand County Yes 95.6 (74.1, 121.8) 55 (28, 60) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Gunnison County Yes 108.3 (84.5, 136.7) 48 (17, 58) 16 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Rio Grande County No 140.4 (109.3, 180.1) 25 (3, 54) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Alamosa County No 152.8 (119.3, 193.4) 20 (2, 51) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Clear Creek County Yes 102.5 (76.6, 135.5) 49 (18, 60) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Baca County No 194.1 (144.7, 259.8) 2 (1, 43) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Lincoln County No 155.1 (116.4, 204.9) 17 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Rio Blanco County No 159.2 (118.5, 210.2) 11 (1, 52) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Washington County No 142.8 (106.1, 191.0) 23 (2, 55) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Custer County Yes 118.6 (82.2, 170.2) 44 (4, 60) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Kit Carson County Yes 100.4 (74.1, 135.3) 51 (19, 60) 10 falling falling trend -8.5 (-14.5, -2.1)
Saguache County Yes 112.9 (80.9, 159.2) 45 (7, 60) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Bent County No 156.5 (114.5, 214.6) 16 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Conejos County No 161.4 (115.6, 221.6) 9 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Phillips County No 131.6 (88.0, 192.3) 32 (2, 59) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
San Miguel County No 123.4 (82.9, 176.1) 38 (3, 59) 8
*
*
Crowley County No 159.3 (111.2, 226.0) 10 (1, 55) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Ouray County Yes 84.3 (56.6, 126.2) 57 (27, 60) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.6)
Sedgwick County No 174.2 (114.3, 264.0) 6 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Cheyenne County No 261.9 (177.2, 381.3) 1 (1, 32) 7 stable stable trend 20.1 (-2.7, 48.2)
Gilpin County Yes 102.1 (64.8, 153.9) 50 (6, 60) 7
*
*
Lake County Yes 96.3 (61.7, 144.6) 54 (11, 60) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Dolores County Yes 118.8 (72.5, 196.6) 42 (2, 60) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Jackson County No 180.2 (108.4, 301.0) 4 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Kiowa County No 140.7 (78.6, 246.4) 24 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Costilla County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 8:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top