Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado N/A No 18.6 (17.9, 19.3) N/A 633 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 2.1)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Adams County 8 Urban No 16.6 (14.4, 19.1) 19 (8, 21) 41 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Arapahoe County Urban No 18.0 (16.1, 20.0) 16 (6, 20) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Boulder County 8 Urban No 20.7 (17.9, 23.8) 7 (2, 16) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.2)
Broomfield County 8 Urban Yes 11.7 (7.6, 17.4) 21 (13, 21) 5 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.8, -1.1)
Delta County Rural No 23.8 (15.6, 35.7) 1 (1, 20) 7
*
*
Denver County Urban No 18.8 (16.8, 21.0) 12 (5, 18) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 5.0)
Douglas County Urban No 16.8 (14.3, 19.6) 18 (8, 21) 33 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.2, 0.2)
El Paso County Urban No 22.7 (20.6, 24.9) 3 (1, 10) 90 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.2, 4.4)
Elbert County Urban No 20.6 (11.3, 35.0) 9 (1, 21) 3
*
*
Fremont County Rural No 22.2 (15.7, 31.2) 5 (1, 20) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Garfield County Rural No 18.0 (12.0, 26.1) 15 (1, 21) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 2.8)
Jefferson County 8 Urban No 17.8 (15.9, 19.8) 17 (7, 20) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
La Plata County Rural No 21.7 (15.4, 30.0) 6 (1, 20) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.7)
Larimer County Urban No 18.6 (16.1, 21.4) 13 (4, 20) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Mesa County Urban No 20.1 (16.6, 24.4) 10 (2, 19) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.1)
Montezuma County Rural No 19.3 (11.8, 30.9) 11 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Montrose County Rural No 18.1 (11.9, 26.8) 14 (1, 21) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.3)
Morgan County Rural No 22.5 (13.5, 35.7) 4 (1, 21) 4 rising rising trend 34.4 (0.9, 60.0)
Pueblo County Urban No 20.6 (17.0, 24.8) 8 (1, 19) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Teller County Urban No 23.4 (13.4, 38.9) 2 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Weld County 8 Urban No 16.0 (13.3, 19.0) 20 (9, 21) 27 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.3)
Alamosa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archuleta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chaffee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eagle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Las Animas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otero County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Park County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prowers County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Grande County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Routt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 11:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top