Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Florida by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida No 166.5 (165.5, 167.4) N/A 24,361 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.6, -2.1)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Alachua County No 197.7 (186.6, 209.2) 27 (14, 40) 249 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Baker County No 219.0 (185.2, 257.0) 14 (2, 47) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Bay County No 183.2 (172.0, 195.0) 40 (22, 50) 207 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Bradford County No 216.1 (185.9, 250.1) 16 (2, 48) 38 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Brevard County No 183.6 (178.1, 189.3) 39 (28, 44) 884 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.0, -2.7)
Broward County No 155.6 (152.3, 158.9) 58 (51, 62) 1,751 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.2)
Calhoun County No 237.6 (195.9, 286.1) 6 (2, 44) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Charlotte County No 156.9 (148.6, 165.7) 55 (45, 62) 365 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Citrus County No 200.1 (189.3, 211.5) 25 (13, 38) 331 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Clay County No 188.6 (177.0, 200.8) 35 (18, 47) 216 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Collier County Yes 115.3 (110.3, 120.5) 67 (65, 67) 469 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Columbia County No 228.8 (209.6, 249.3) 9 (2, 25) 109 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
DeSoto County No 167.5 (147.2, 190.2) 48 (22, 65) 50 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Dixie County No 226.4 (192.0, 266.2) 12 (2, 45) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Duval County No 202.8 (196.8, 209.0) 23 (14, 31) 921 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Escambia County No 228.7 (218.6, 239.1) 10 (4, 19) 410 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Flagler County No 172.3 (160.5, 185.1) 45 (30, 59) 183 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Franklin County No 207.0 (168.4, 253.4) 20 (2, 62) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Gadsden County No 211.1 (187.0, 237.7) 17 (3, 45) 59 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Gilchrist County No 221.3 (185.1, 263.2) 13 (2, 50) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Glades County Yes 117.2 (91.9, 149.5) 66 (54, 67) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3)
Gulf County No 190.4 (156.0, 231.3) 32 (4, 65) 23 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)
Hamilton County No 259.9 (213.0, 314.2) 2 (2, 37) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Hardee County No 154.2 (128.2, 184.0) 61 (25, 67) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Hendry County No 155.1 (132.5, 180.4) 59 (28, 66) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Hernando County No 199.4 (189.7, 209.7) 26 (14, 37) 340 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Highlands County No 155.8 (144.5, 168.0) 57 (44, 64) 179 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Hillsborough County No 177.7 (173.2, 182.2) 43 (34, 47) 1,261 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Holmes County No 208.3 (175.4, 246.1) 18 (2, 55) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Indian River County No 185.0 (174.8, 195.8) 38 (21, 47) 298 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Jackson County No 250.7 (226.5, 277.0) 3 (2, 18) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Jefferson County No 189.7 (153.9, 232.6) 33 (4, 65) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Lafayette County No 233.4 (176.1, 303.9) 7 (2, 62) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Lake County No 181.6 (174.7, 188.8) 41 (28, 47) 559 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Lee County No 139.7 (135.6, 143.9) 65 (61, 66) 982 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Leon County No 167.8 (157.4, 178.6) 47 (35, 60) 212 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Levy County No 226.6 (203.7, 251.8) 11 (2, 32) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Liberty County No 196.4 (140.8, 266.5) 29 (2, 67) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Madison County No 233.3 (195.7, 276.4) 8 (2, 44) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Manatee County No 141.5 (135.7, 147.5) 63 (59, 66) 499 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Marion County No 196.0 (188.8, 203.5) 30 (17, 37) 629 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Martin County No 152.3 (143.6, 161.6) 62 (47, 65) 259 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Miami-Dade County No 157.9 (155.0, 160.8) 53 (49, 60) 2,301 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.8)
Monroe County No 158.0 (144.2, 173.0) 52 (40, 65) 103 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Nassau County No 204.5 (188.4, 221.9) 22 (8, 40) 128 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Okaloosa County No 179.1 (168.0, 190.6) 42 (26, 52) 207 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Okeechobee County No 206.6 (184.3, 231.1) 21 (5, 45) 63 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Orange County No 173.5 (168.6, 178.6) 44 (38, 50) 1,004 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Osceola County No 187.6 (178.1, 197.5) 36 (21, 45) 309 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 4.6)
Palm Beach County No 139.8 (136.7, 142.9) 64 (61, 66) 1,692 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Pasco County No 189.4 (183.3, 195.7) 34 (23, 42) 763 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Pinellas County No 166.8 (162.6, 171.0) 49 (43, 54) 1,328 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Polk County No 163.4 (158.2, 168.7) 51 (44, 58) 784 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.4)
Putnam County No 237.6 (219.6, 257.0) 5 (2, 19) 137 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Santa Rosa County No 187.1 (174.9, 200.0) 37 (18, 48) 189 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Sarasota County No 157.0 (151.4, 162.9) 54 (48, 62) 768 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Seminole County No 171.6 (164.2, 179.4) 46 (36, 54) 415 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
St. Johns County No 154.9 (146.4, 163.7) 60 (47, 63) 265 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
St. Lucie County No 165.7 (158.6, 173.1) 50 (41, 59) 433 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Sumter County No 156.0 (145.8, 167.3) 56 (44, 64) 310 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Suwannee County No 216.8 (194.3, 241.4) 15 (3, 40) 70 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.3)
Taylor County No 200.4 (169.5, 235.7) 24 (3, 61) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Union County No 563.5 (498.2, 635.3) 1 (1, 1) 62 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Volusia County No 192.6 (186.7, 198.7) 31 (20, 39) 853 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Wakulla County No 207.4 (177.0, 241.6) 19 (2, 54) 38 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Walton County No 197.6 (179.5, 217.1) 28 (9, 47) 95 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Washington County No 246.9 (213.4, 284.6) 4 (2, 28) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 12:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top