Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Florida by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida Yes 121.2 (120.4, 122.0) N/A 20,850 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Union County No 203.5 (158.0, 259.1) 1 (1, 35) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Liberty County No 174.5 (123.2, 242.4) 2 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Levy County No 168.0 (147.6, 190.9) 3 (1, 29) 57 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Lafayette County No 167.5 (119.0, 230.9) 4 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Columbia County No 167.2 (150.8, 185.1) 5 (1, 23) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Okeechobee County No 165.0 (143.6, 189.1) 6 (1, 37) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Suwannee County No 161.8 (142.9, 182.9) 7 (1, 36) 59 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Washington County No 159.5 (133.2, 190.2) 8 (1, 55) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Hamilton County No 159.4 (124.0, 203.3) 9 (1, 66) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Taylor County No 155.3 (127.6, 188.1) 10 (1, 58) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Putnam County No 153.8 (139.5, 169.5) 11 (2, 37) 95 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Bradford County No 153.2 (128.1, 182.2) 12 (1, 56) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Nassau County No 151.5 (138.3, 165.9) 13 (3, 38) 105 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Holmes County No 150.4 (122.4, 183.8) 14 (1, 64) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Clay County No 148.4 (139.2, 158.1) 15 (6, 34) 202 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Citrus County No 147.7 (138.1, 158.0) 16 (6, 35) 251 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
DeSoto County No 147.3 (126.3, 171.3) 17 (2, 57) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Dixie County No 146.0 (116.6, 182.0) 18 (1, 66) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Duval County No 145.4 (141.0, 150.0) 19 (10, 30) 853 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Jackson County No 144.7 (127.0, 164.6) 20 (3, 56) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Jefferson County No 144.5 (112.4, 184.6) 21 (1, 66) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Hernando County No 142.4 (134.3, 150.9) 22 (9, 39) 271 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Okaloosa County No 142.2 (133.1, 151.7) 23 (9, 43) 193 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Escambia County No 141.7 (134.5, 149.2) 24 (10, 38) 312 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Gulf County No 141.5 (110.9, 179.9) 25 (1, 66) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Calhoun County No 140.6 (109.7, 179.0) 26 (1, 67) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Baker County No 140.5 (116.3, 168.6) 27 (2, 66) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Franklin County No 139.9 (104.7, 185.6) 28 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Volusia County No 139.5 (134.6, 144.5) 29 (15, 37) 710 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
Wakulla County No 138.6 (114.9, 165.9) 30 (2, 66) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Pasco County No 138.5 (133.5, 143.6) 31 (16, 38) 637 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
Gilchrist County No 136.5 (109.1, 169.7) 32 (2, 67) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Marion County No 136.0 (130.2, 142.1) 33 (17, 43) 489 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Highlands County No 133.7 (122.7, 145.7) 34 (13, 56) 159 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Brevard County No 133.5 (128.9, 138.2) 35 (23, 45) 736 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Glades County No 132.8 (103.0, 171.3) 36 (2, 67) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Polk County No 132.0 (127.5, 136.6) 37 (24, 47) 701 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Bay County No 130.7 (121.7, 140.2) 38 (19, 56) 167 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
St. Lucie County No 130.6 (124.4, 137.2) 39 (23, 53) 367 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Alachua County No 128.5 (120.5, 136.9) 40 (22, 57) 203 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Flagler County No 128.0 (118.4, 138.5) 41 (20, 59) 154 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Lake County No 127.6 (122.0, 133.5) 42 (27, 56) 440 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Hardee County No 127.1 (103.1, 155.4) 43 (5, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Seminole County No 126.6 (121.0, 132.4) 44 (30, 56) 403 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Walton County No 125.6 (111.9, 140.6) 45 (16, 65) 66 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Pinellas County No 124.8 (121.4, 128.2) 46 (35, 55) 1,191 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Santa Rosa County No 124.7 (115.6, 134.4) 47 (25, 60) 146 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Indian River County No 124.2 (116.3, 132.8) 48 (27, 59) 236 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Leon County No 124.2 (116.5, 132.3) 49 (28, 59) 204 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Osceola County No 123.6 (116.8, 130.6) 50 (30, 59) 252 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Hillsborough County No 123.5 (120.2, 126.9) 51 (37, 56) 1,100 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Madison County No 123.4 (98.8, 153.5) 52 (6, 67) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Hendry County Yes 122.4 (102.2, 145.4) 53 (9, 67) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Orange County Yes 120.9 (117.3, 124.6) 54 (41, 58) 889 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.5)
Broward County Yes 120.2 (117.6, 122.8) 55 (44, 58) 1,688 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
Monroe County Yes 120.0 (107.3, 134.2) 56 (24, 66) 70 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Gadsden County Yes 117.7 (101.6, 135.9) 57 (17, 67) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Charlotte County Yes 115.9 (108.5, 123.9) 58 (40, 66) 277 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
St. Johns County Yes 114.5 (107.8, 121.6) 59 (44, 65) 228 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Sarasota County Yes 112.2 (107.6, 117.0) 60 (52, 65) 626 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Sumter County Yes 109.0 (98.3, 121.1) 61 (41, 67) 202 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Palm Beach County Yes 109.0 (106.4, 111.6) 62 (56, 66) 1,570 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.4)
Lee County Yes 107.7 (104.1, 111.5) 63 (56, 66) 798 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Martin County Yes 107.3 (99.9, 115.2) 64 (52, 66) 203 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Manatee County Yes 106.9 (102.0, 112.0) 65 (56, 66) 421 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Miami-Dade County Yes 105.0 (102.9, 107.1) 66 (60, 66) 2,084 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Collier County Yes 91.3 (86.8, 96.1) 67 (66, 67) 388 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/29/2023 9:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top