Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Georgia by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia N/A No 13.8 (13.5, 14.1) N/A 1,623 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.5, -1.4)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Oconee County Urban Yes 7.6 (4.5, 12.1) 106 (57, 106) 4
*
*
Union County Rural No 10.0 (6.3, 16.0) 105 (26, 106) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.2, 0.0)
Forsyth County Urban No 10.2 (8.4, 12.1) 104 (68, 106) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -0.6)
Camden County Rural No 10.2 (6.6, 15.1) 103 (30, 106) 5
*
*
Lowndes County Urban No 10.8 (8.2, 13.9) 102 (43, 106) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Columbia County Urban No 11.0 (8.9, 13.5) 101 (54, 106) 19 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.7)
Gwinnett County Urban No 11.1 (10.1, 12.2) 100 (72, 104) 95 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Paulding County Urban No 11.2 (8.9, 13.9) 99 (49, 106) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.2)
Hall County Urban No 11.3 (9.5, 13.5) 98 (54, 105) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.4)
Monroe County Urban No 11.5 (7.0, 18.1) 97 (17, 106) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -0.8)
DeKalb County Urban No 11.8 (10.7, 12.9) 96 (65, 102) 93 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Lumpkin County Urban No 11.8 (7.5, 17.8) 95 (16, 106) 5
*
*
Dougherty County Urban No 12.0 (9.2, 15.5) 94 (31, 106) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Cobb County Urban No 12.3 (11.2, 13.5) 93 (58, 99) 97 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Chatham County Urban No 12.3 (10.7, 14.1) 92 (48, 103) 43 falling falling trend -8.2 (-15.0, -2.2)
Fayette County Urban No 12.3 (9.9, 15.2) 91 (36, 105) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.4)
Catoosa County Urban No 12.3 (9.2, 16.3) 90 (27, 106) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.3)
Colquitt County Rural No 12.4 (8.5, 17.5) 89 (20, 106) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Liberty County Urban No 12.4 (8.4, 17.8) 88 (16, 106) 6
*
*
Douglas County Urban No 12.5 (9.9, 15.5) 87 (33, 105) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.4)
Tattnall County Rural No 12.5 (7.2, 20.3) 86 (9, 106) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.1)
Gilmer County Rural No 12.6 (8.5, 18.5) 85 (16, 106) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.4)
Walker County Urban No 12.7 (9.6, 16.6) 84 (24, 106) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Clarke County Urban No 13.0 (10.1, 16.5) 83 (26, 105) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Cherokee County Urban No 13.1 (11.3, 15.2) 82 (38, 101) 39 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.4)
Houston County Urban No 13.2 (10.8, 16.0) 81 (27, 103) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -0.9)
Fulton County Urban No 13.3 (12.3, 14.4) 80 (49, 91) 138 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Gordon County Rural No 13.3 (9.6, 18.1) 79 (17, 106) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.6)
Coffee County Rural No 13.3 (9.0, 19.1) 78 (14, 106) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Worth County Urban No 13.4 (8.1, 21.3) 77 (6, 106) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.2)
Grady County Rural No 13.4 (8.3, 20.7) 76 (8, 106) 4
*
*
Glynn County Urban No 13.5 (10.7, 17.0) 75 (23, 104) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 13.6 (10.3, 17.6) 74 (20, 106) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 0.4)
Rabun County Rural No 13.7 (8.6, 21.9) 73 (10, 106) 5
*
*
Floyd County Urban No 13.7 (10.8, 17.1) 72 (25, 104) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
White County Rural No 13.7 (8.6, 21.0) 71 (7, 106) 5
*
*
Pickens County Urban No 13.7 (9.2, 20.0) 70 (9, 106) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.3, 0.0)
Lamar County Rural No 13.8 (7.7, 23.0) 69 (4, 106) 3
*
*
Jones County Urban No 13.9 (8.9, 20.9) 68 (9, 106) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.6)
McDuffie County Urban No 14.2 (8.7, 22.3) 67 (5, 106) 4 falling falling trend -5.0 (-34.1, -0.3)
Henry County Urban No 14.3 (12.1, 16.7) 66 (27, 98) 34 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.6)
Coweta County Urban No 14.4 (11.8, 17.3) 65 (21, 101) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.5, 0.0)
Greene County Rural No 14.4 (8.5, 23.5) 64 (3, 106) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 1.0)
Ware County Rural No 14.4 (9.8, 20.5) 63 (9, 106) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Banks County Rural No 14.5 (8.3, 24.0) 62 (3, 106) 3
*
*
Toombs County Rural No 14.6 (9.4, 21.9) 61 (5, 106) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Newton County Urban No 14.6 (11.6, 18.2) 60 (16, 103) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.7)
Tift County Rural No 14.7 (10.1, 20.7) 59 (8, 106) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.7)
Polk County Rural No 14.7 (10.3, 20.4) 58 (8, 106) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Baldwin County Rural No 14.8 (10.4, 20.6) 57 (10, 105) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.4)
Bibb County Urban No 14.9 (12.5, 17.8) 56 (21, 96) 27 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Berrien County Rural No 15.0 (9.0, 24.1) 55 (3, 106) 4
*
*
Laurens County Rural No 15.1 (11.1, 20.2) 54 (12, 105) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.3)
Rockdale County Urban No 15.1 (11.9, 18.9) 53 (15, 101) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.6, 0.0)
Habersham County Rural No 15.1 (10.8, 20.6) 52 (9, 105) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.3)
Bartow County Urban No 15.2 (12.2, 18.8) 51 (16, 99) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Muscogee County Urban No 15.2 (13.0, 17.7) 50 (21, 91) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Clayton County Urban No 15.2 (12.9, 17.8) 49 (21, 91) 37 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Murray County Urban No 15.2 (10.4, 21.5) 48 (7, 106) 7
*
*
Fannin County Rural No 15.3 (10.2, 22.6) 47 (5, 106) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.8)
Whitfield County Urban No 15.5 (12.4, 19.2) 46 (12, 98) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Chattooga County Rural No 15.6 (10.1, 23.3) 45 (3, 106) 5
*
*
Bryan County Urban No 15.7 (10.4, 22.5) 44 (5, 106) 6
*
*
Troup County Rural No 15.7 (12.0, 20.2) 43 (10, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Morgan County Urban No 15.8 (9.9, 24.3) 42 (3, 106) 5
*
*
Lee County Urban No 15.9 (10.2, 23.7) 41 (4, 106) 5
*
*
Walton County Urban No 16.0 (12.8, 19.7) 40 (12, 97) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.3)
Appling County Rural No 16.0 (9.6, 25.5) 39 (2, 106) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.0)
Barrow County Urban No 16.2 (12.5, 20.6) 38 (8, 100) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.9)
Bulloch County Rural No 16.2 (12.3, 21.0) 37 (9, 101) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.9)
Thomas County Rural No 16.4 (12.0, 22.1) 36 (6, 104) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Harris County Urban No 16.4 (11.3, 23.2) 35 (5, 105) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.1)
Burke County Urban No 16.5 (10.4, 25.0) 34 (2, 106) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.2)
Carroll County Urban No 16.6 (13.5, 20.2) 33 (11, 88) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Elbert County Rural No 16.7 (9.9, 26.6) 32 (1, 106) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.7)
Meriwether County Urban No 17.5 (11.5, 25.9) 31 (2, 106) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Peach County Urban No 17.7 (11.9, 25.5) 30 (2, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.7)
Wayne County Rural No 17.8 (12.2, 25.3) 29 (2, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.4)
Dawson County Urban No 17.8 (12.0, 25.7) 28 (2, 105) 7
*
*
Richmond County Urban No 18.0 (15.5, 20.8) 27 (11, 66) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Butts County Urban No 18.4 (11.9, 27.2) 26 (1, 105) 5
*
*
Putnam County Rural No 18.6 (12.4, 27.3) 25 (1, 104) 7 rising rising trend 21.8 (2.3, 35.0)
Hart County Rural No 18.6 (13.1, 26.1) 24 (2, 102) 8
*
*
Screven County Rural No 18.6 (11.2, 29.9) 23 (1, 106) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Brooks County Urban No 19.2 (11.9, 29.8) 22 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Emanuel County Rural No 19.6 (12.6, 29.2) 21 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Dodge County Rural No 19.9 (13.3, 29.1) 20 (1, 104) 6
*
*
Decatur County Rural No 20.1 (13.9, 28.2) 19 (1, 98) 7
*
*
Effingham County Urban No 20.3 (15.5, 26.1) 18 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 2.3)
Mitchell County Rural No 20.4 (13.5, 29.8) 17 (1, 104) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Wilkes County Rural No 20.8 (11.9, 35.4) 16 (1, 106) 3
*
*
Haralson County Urban No 21.3 (14.9, 29.5) 15 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.5)
Brantley County Urban No 21.4 (13.3, 32.7) 14 (1, 105) 5
*
*
Upson County Rural No 21.4 (15.1, 29.6) 13 (1, 90) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.6)
Spalding County Urban No 21.9 (17.5, 27.1) 12 (1, 53) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.4)
Pike County Urban No 22.0 (14.0, 33.2) 11 (1, 102) 5
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural No 22.6 (13.8, 35.2) 10 (1, 104) 4
*
*
Madison County Urban No 22.7 (16.2, 31.1) 9 (1, 88) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.6)
Washington County Rural No 22.8 (14.9, 33.7) 8 (1, 98) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Telfair County Rural No 23.2 (14.1, 36.9) 7 (1, 105) 4
*
*
Franklin County Rural No 24.0 (16.8, 33.4) 6 (1, 85) 8
*
*
Crawford County Urban No 25.3 (14.9, 40.8) 5 (1, 104) 4
*
*
Macon County Rural No 25.3 (15.1, 40.5) 4 (1, 104) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.4)
Sumter County Rural No 26.1 (18.9, 35.3) 3 (1, 57) 9
*
*
Jefferson County Rural No 27.7 (18.4, 40.4) 2 (1, 78) 6
*
*
Stephens County Rural No 27.9 (20.5, 37.3) 1 (1, 45) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.9)
Atkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ben Hill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bleckley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crisp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oglethorpe County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towns County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 6:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top