Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho No 145.9 (143.5, 148.3) N/A 2,977 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.0, -0.1)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Camas County No 283.5 (162.7, 465.9) 1 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Shoshone County No 191.6 (164.3, 222.9) 2 (1, 19) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Elmore County No 180.3 (158.0, 204.8) 3 (1, 21) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Clearwater County No 176.9 (148.1, 211.2) 4 (1, 29) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Custer County No 172.6 (131.7, 226.1) 5 (1, 38) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Payette County No 165.3 (145.5, 187.2) 6 (2, 29) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Nez Perce County No 164.1 (149.6, 179.7) 7 (3, 24) 100 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Kootenai County No 163.2 (155.5, 171.3) 8 (4, 19) 351 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Butte County No 162.8 (107.1, 240.5) 9 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.7, 11.3)
Benewah County No 161.5 (132.7, 195.8) 10 (1, 35) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Washington County No 161.0 (134.9, 191.8) 11 (1, 35) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Bonner County No 159.8 (146.4, 174.2) 12 (4, 26) 117 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Gooding County No 153.6 (130.2, 180.3) 13 (2, 36) 31 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Twin Falls County No 153.5 (142.7, 164.8) 14 (5, 28) 155 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Bannock County No 153.4 (142.0, 165.5) 15 (6, 29) 140 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Lewis County No 153.0 (111.1, 208.9) 16 (1, 42) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Owyhee County No 152.9 (125.2, 185.2) 17 (2, 39) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Adams County No 152.6 (114.6, 203.5) 18 (1, 41) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Boundary County No 152.0 (126.6, 181.6) 19 (2, 37) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lincoln County No 150.7 (107.6, 205.5) 20 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Canyon County No 150.1 (142.9, 157.5) 21 (9, 27) 342 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Bingham County No 148.3 (133.2, 164.6) 22 (5, 34) 73 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Gem County No 146.6 (126.6, 169.3) 23 (4, 36) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Lemhi County No 143.8 (117.4, 176.5) 24 (3, 39) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Minidoka County No 142.5 (121.8, 165.8) 25 (5, 38) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Ada County No 139.6 (134.9, 144.3) 26 (18, 32) 706 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Bonneville County No 139.2 (129.7, 149.2) 27 (14, 34) 164 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Jerome County No 136.9 (116.2, 160.2) 28 (6, 39) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Idaho County No 136.5 (118.6, 157.2) 29 (8, 38) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Bear Lake County No 136.3 (102.7, 178.7) 30 (2, 42) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Cassia County No 131.0 (111.9, 152.6) 31 (11, 40) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Latah County No 129.6 (114.1, 146.7) 32 (15, 39) 53 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County No 127.5 (108.4, 148.9) 33 (12, 41) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Fremont County Yes 121.7 (98.6, 149.0) 34 (12, 42) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Power County Yes 120.5 (89.5, 159.0) 35 (5, 43) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Valley County Yes 120.0 (96.8, 147.9) 36 (12, 43) 22 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Caribou County Yes 117.4 (88.1, 154.3) 37 (7, 43) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Teton County Yes 112.1 (82.8, 147.9) 38 (9, 43) 11
*
*
Franklin County Yes 109.2 (86.3, 136.4) 39 (20, 43) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Madison County Yes 98.4 (80.3, 119.2) 40 (31, 43) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Boise County Yes 97.9 (73.6, 129.8) 41 (26, 43) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Blaine County Yes 97.1 (81.1, 115.5) 42 (33, 43) 29 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Oneida County Yes 78.5 (51.1, 117.8) 43 (32, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Clark County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2022 7:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top