Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho No 493.7 (485.5, 502.0) N/A 2,841 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.7)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Camas County No 879.9 (519.1, 1,392.5) 1 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Elmore County No 615.8 (538.3, 701.3) 2 (1, 21) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Shoshone County No 614.4 (527.7, 711.4) 3 (1, 22) 37 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Custer County No 602.0 (459.9, 774.2) 4 (1, 36) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Clearwater County No 589.4 (496.8, 694.7) 5 (1, 30) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Benewah County No 555.9 (456.4, 670.8) 6 (1, 35) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Nez Perce County No 554.0 (505.3, 606.3) 7 (2, 23) 97 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Kootenai County No 550.6 (524.2, 578.0) 8 (4, 19) 336 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Gooding County No 548.9 (465.1, 643.5) 9 (1, 33) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Payette County No 546.0 (479.6, 619.0) 10 (2, 30) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Washington County No 543.8 (456.8, 643.1) 11 (1, 34) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Bonner County No 542.1 (497.1, 590.1) 12 (2, 24) 114 stable stable trend -7.3 (-15.1, 1.2)
Twin Falls County No 528.7 (491.2, 568.3) 13 (4, 26) 150 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Adams County No 527.0 (397.4, 685.8) 14 (1, 40) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Bannock County No 525.6 (485.8, 567.8) 15 (4, 27) 134 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Canyon County No 507.3 (482.4, 533.1) 16 (9, 27) 324 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Lemhi County No 505.7 (413.9, 612.2) 17 (2, 38) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Butte County No 501.9 (332.4, 727.2) 18 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.9, 9.8)
Gem County No 497.8 (430.1, 573.3) 19 (3, 35) 40 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Bingham County No 495.0 (443.4, 551.0) 20 (6, 34) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Boundary County No 492.4 (410.1, 586.5) 21 (3, 37) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Lewis County No 489.3 (361.9, 648.7) 22 (1, 42) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Idaho County No 488.4 (424.5, 559.5) 23 (5, 36) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Lincoln County No 476.6 (334.0, 658.9) 24 (1, 43) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Ada County No 475.8 (459.5, 492.5) 25 (17, 31) 671 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Bonneville County No 465.7 (433.0, 500.2) 26 (15, 34) 155 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Owyhee County No 465.1 (378.4, 565.8) 27 (4, 40) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Minidoka County No 463.0 (394.6, 539.8) 28 (7, 39) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Cassia County No 453.5 (386.4, 528.9) 29 (7, 39) 33 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Jerome County No 448.1 (377.8, 527.5) 30 (7, 40) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Latah County No 431.1 (378.5, 489.0) 31 (16, 39) 50 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Jefferson County No 422.7 (356.8, 497.2) 32 (13, 41) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Bear Lake County No 417.8 (313.1, 547.3) 33 (4, 43) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Caribou County No 410.1 (307.4, 536.9) 34 (5, 43) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Fremont County No 409.4 (329.8, 502.4) 35 (10, 42) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Valley County No 400.9 (323.1, 491.6) 36 (12, 43) 21 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Power County No 395.9 (292.4, 524.0) 37 (6, 43) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Teton County No 370.9 (268.5, 497.7) 38 (10, 43) 10
*
*
Madison County No 338.7 (274.8, 412.7) 39 (29, 43) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Franklin County No 338.6 (264.0, 427.8) 40 (26, 43) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Boise County No 330.8 (248.5, 431.4) 41 (22, 43) 13 falling falling trend -7.8 (-11.5, -4.0)
Blaine County No 317.5 (263.8, 378.6) 42 (32, 43) 27 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Oneida County No 283.9 (184.8, 418.3) 43 (27, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Clark County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 1:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top