Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Idaho N/A No 835.7 (820.4, 851.2) N/A 2,326 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.2)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Caribou County Rural No 768.3 (556.0, 1,033.8) 34 (1, 42) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.7)
Fremont County Rural No 751.6 (595.5, 935.8) 35 (4, 41) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Bear Lake County Rural No 864.4 (648.5, 1,128.5) 17 (1, 41) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.4)
Latah County Rural No 855.6 (746.5, 976.0) 20 (2, 36) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Oneida County Rural No 702.3 (475.8, 998.3) 37 (2, 42) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.6)
Bannock County Urban No 915.5 (836.8, 999.6) 10 (2, 28) 103 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Butte County Urban No 1,010.9 (679.1, 1,446.7) 1 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.2)
Custer County Rural No 803.6 (582.5, 1,080.2) 27 (1, 42) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.4)
Idaho County Rural No 952.5 (825.9, 1,092.7) 5 (1, 31) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Lewis County Rural No 935.0 (678.0, 1,256.7) 7 (1, 40) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Benewah County Rural No 1,004.6 (807.7, 1,234.1) 2 (1, 35) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.9)
Canyon County Urban No 856.9 (810.2, 905.6) 19 (8, 31) 260 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Franklin County Urban No 637.0 (490.6, 813.7) 39 (14, 42) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Gooding County Rural No 800.8 (654.7, 969.6) 30 (2, 40) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Bingham County Rural No 819.2 (723.1, 924.4) 24 (5, 37) 54 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Boundary County Rural No 878.7 (725.2, 1,055.1) 15 (1, 38) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Clearwater County Rural No 961.7 (793.7, 1,154.6) 3 (1, 35) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Owyhee County Urban No 801.1 (635.0, 997.1) 29 (1, 40) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Payette County Rural No 932.6 (810.6, 1,067.6) 8 (1, 33) 43 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Bonneville County Urban No 777.7 (716.4, 842.8) 32 (15, 37) 121 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Gem County Urban No 861.7 (738.7, 999.4) 18 (2, 37) 36 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 661.9 (540.0, 802.8) 38 (17, 42) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Twin Falls County Urban No 873.6 (805.1, 946.3) 16 (4, 31) 121 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.7, 0.2)
Elmore County Rural No 955.3 (817.0, 1,109.9) 4 (1, 33) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Lemhi County Rural No 923.4 (752.0, 1,121.7) 9 (1, 37) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Washington County Rural No 905.9 (747.5, 1,087.7) 12 (1, 37) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Jerome County Urban No 840.9 (696.9, 1,005.5) 22 (1, 39) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 889.3 (601.4, 1,267.4) 14 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.4)
Minidoka County Rural No 824.4 (691.0, 975.9) 23 (3, 39) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.4)
Power County Rural No 785.6 (577.7, 1,043.5) 31 (1, 42) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.6)
Cassia County Rural No 774.6 (647.4, 919.5) 33 (4, 40) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Ada County Urban No 807.4 (777.4, 838.3) 25 (17, 34) 561 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Adams County Rural No 907.1 (674.5, 1,194.0) 11 (1, 40) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.0)
Madison County Rural No 575.4 (456.3, 715.9) 40 (30, 42) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.5)
Valley County Rural No 710.0 (564.0, 881.7) 36 (8, 42) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.6)
Boise County Urban No 539.2 (391.0, 724.8) 41 (27, 42) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -0.9)
Blaine County Rural No 517.1 (425.8, 622.1) 42 (36, 42) 23 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Kootenai County Urban No 936.9 (888.1, 987.7) 6 (2, 20) 284 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.3, -0.9)
Nez Perce County Urban No 892.2 (803.9, 987.5) 13 (2, 32) 75 falling falling trend -5.8 (-13.6, -0.5)
Shoshone County Rural No 804.7 (664.9, 965.2) 26 (3, 39) 24 falling falling trend -5.9 (-15.8, -2.2)
Bonner County Rural No 802.2 (726.6, 883.5) 28 (10, 37) 87 falling falling trend -7.6 (-13.4, -3.3)
Teton County Rural No 851.0 (618.1, 1,140.7) 21 (1, 42) 10
*
*
Camas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top