Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho No 873.3 (857.0, 889.8) N/A 2,240 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.7, 0.7)
United States No 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) N/A 431,628 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Clearwater County No 1,089.2 (905.4, 1,299.3) 1 (1, 26) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Elmore County No 1,052.3 (900.2, 1,222.5) 2 (1, 25) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Benewah County No 1,030.0 (829.4, 1,264.0) 3 (1, 32) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Shoshone County No 1,013.6 (850.3, 1,199.1) 4 (1, 30) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Nez Perce County No 1,008.1 (911.2, 1,112.4) 5 (1, 21) 81 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Kootenai County No 989.2 (936.8, 1,043.8) 6 (2, 16) 273 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Bonner County No 962.7 (873.9, 1,057.9) 7 (1, 24) 91 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Custer County No 956.5 (706.8, 1,264.6) 8 (1, 39) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Adams County No 953.1 (704.6, 1,260.2) 9 (1, 39) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Gooding County No 947.1 (786.4, 1,130.8) 10 (1, 33) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Bannock County No 944.2 (864.6, 1,029.2) 11 (2, 26) 107 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Washington County No 935.7 (770.4, 1,125.6) 12 (1, 34) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Payette County No 928.8 (801.6, 1,070.3) 13 (1, 32) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Lincoln County No 894.3 (605.0, 1,274.0) 14 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Bingham County No 893.9 (790.9, 1,006.6) 15 (3, 32) 56 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Gem County No 891.4 (758.8, 1,040.2) 16 (2, 34) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Twin Falls County No 889.0 (817.2, 965.5) 17 (6, 30) 114 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Idaho County No 888.4 (765.3, 1,025.5) 18 (2, 34) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Lewis County No 883.7 (641.2, 1,187.9) 19 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Canyon County No 876.1 (827.1, 927.2) 20 (9, 28) 246 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Lemhi County No 868.7 (704.5, 1,059.6) 21 (2, 38) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Ada County No 853.5 (820.6, 887.3) 22 (13, 29) 526 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Boundary County No 849.4 (691.7, 1,032.1) 23 (2, 38) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Minidoka County No 848.7 (713.1, 1,002.3) 24 (3, 37) 28 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Butte County No 839.5 (542.1, 1,240.5) 25 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Bear Lake County No 836.2 (617.3, 1,106.8) 26 (1, 41) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Bonneville County No 807.5 (743.1, 876.0) 27 (14, 35) 118 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Jerome County No 797.0 (657.0, 958.0) 28 (6, 39) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Latah County No 785.7 (680.4, 902.6) 29 (10, 38) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Cassia County No 779.1 (648.8, 927.7) 30 (7, 39) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Fremont County No 749.6 (590.0, 938.7) 31 (6, 41) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Jefferson County No 719.8 (589.5, 870.0) 32 (12, 41) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Owyhee County No 719.1 (559.1, 910.5) 33 (7, 42) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Caribou County No 703.7 (504.0, 955.7) 34 (4, 42) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Teton County No 701.5 (488.0, 974.8) 35 (3, 42) 8
*
*
Valley County No 673.8 (526.8, 848.7) 36 (14, 42) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Madison County No 643.2 (511.5, 798.1) 37 (21, 42) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Power County No 641.7 (447.6, 890.9) 38 (8, 42) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Blaine County No 580.2 (471.0, 706.5) 39 (29, 42) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Oneida County No 576.2 (367.9, 858.2) 40 (10, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.1)
Boise County No 523.3 (370.2, 718.1) 41 (27, 42) 9 falling falling trend -7.7 (-13.1, -1.9)
Franklin County No 505.2 (373.0, 669.3) 42 (31, 42) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Camas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 3:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top