Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho No 169.7 (165.9, 173.5) N/A 1,608 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Ada County No 159.8 (152.3, 167.6) 28 (17, 31) 363 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Adams County No 166.1 (115.0, 242.9) 23 (1, 41) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Bannock County No 181.7 (163.1, 201.9) 14 (4, 28) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Bear Lake County No 162.3 (112.0, 230.4) 24 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Benewah County No 192.5 (149.0, 246.9) 8 (1, 35) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Bingham County No 168.9 (145.6, 194.8) 21 (5, 33) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Blaine County No 130.1 (103.5, 161.6) 32 (18, 42) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Boise County Yes 86.0 (55.1, 133.2) 42 (29, 42) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.1)
Bonner County No 185.1 (164.3, 208.2) 13 (3, 29) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Bonneville County No 160.4 (145.3, 176.7) 27 (12, 33) 85 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Boundary County No 178.1 (138.7, 226.4) 15 (1, 36) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Butte County No 190.3 (108.3, 317.2) 10 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Canyon County No 176.1 (164.6, 188.2) 19 (8, 27) 183 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Caribou County No 130.0 (84.9, 191.4) 33 (4, 42) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Cassia County No 161.1 (130.2, 197.1) 26 (4, 37) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Clearwater County No 200.9 (160.6, 251.5) 6 (1, 31) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Custer County No 208.7 (144.6, 299.1) 4 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Elmore County No 224.0 (187.2, 265.6) 3 (1, 21) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Franklin County Yes 106.0 (74.4, 146.4) 41 (24, 42) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Fremont County Yes 114.2 (83.7, 152.8) 39 (21, 42) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Gem County No 167.5 (137.7, 202.8) 22 (3, 36) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Gooding County No 190.1 (153.2, 233.8) 11 (1, 33) 19 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Idaho County No 152.7 (126.6, 184.2) 29 (8, 38) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Jefferson County No 161.9 (130.5, 198.2) 25 (4, 38) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Jerome County No 127.6 (99.4, 161.2) 34 (17, 42) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Kootenai County No 191.0 (178.6, 204.0) 9 (4, 21) 187 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Latah County No 145.4 (121.5, 172.6) 30 (14, 39) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Lemhi County No 177.9 (136.6, 231.8) 16 (1, 37) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Lewis County No 225.9 (150.4, 331.6) 2 (1, 36) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Lincoln County Yes 122.4 (71.1, 196.7) 35 (3, 42) 4
*
*
Madison County Yes 121.5 (91.7, 157.0) 36 (19, 42) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Minidoka County No 176.3 (143.5, 214.5) 18 (2, 35) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Nez Perce County No 205.2 (181.6, 231.4) 5 (1, 21) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Oneida County Yes 117.9 (70.5, 190.4) 37 (6, 42) 4
*
*
Owyhee County No 171.2 (131.0, 220.4) 20 (1, 38) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Payette County No 192.8 (162.5, 227.5) 7 (1, 30) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Power County No 143.5 (96.5, 206.2) 31 (2, 42) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Shoshone County No 236.2 (191.9, 288.8) 1 (1, 20) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Teton County Yes 117.1 (77.3, 169.4) 38 (11, 42) 7
*
*
Twin Falls County No 188.5 (170.7, 207.7) 12 (3, 24) 84 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Valley County Yes 106.8 (78.5, 144.5) 40 (26, 42) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Washington County No 177.0 (138.9, 224.6) 17 (1, 37) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Camas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 12:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top