Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho No 149.2 (146.7, 151.8) N/A 2,822 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -0.3)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Ada County No 141.8 (137.0, 146.8) 27 (19, 33) 673 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Kootenai County No 164.5 (156.6, 172.8) 12 (5, 22) 339 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Canyon County No 156.6 (148.8, 164.8) 19 (8, 27) 312 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Bonneville County No 141.9 (132.0, 152.4) 26 (16, 35) 157 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Twin Falls County No 158.0 (146.6, 170.2) 18 (6, 28) 146 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Bannock County No 152.0 (140.2, 164.6) 21 (8, 32) 127 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Bonner County No 162.9 (149.2, 177.8) 13 (4, 27) 116 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Nez Perce County No 165.1 (150.1, 181.4) 10 (3, 28) 95 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Bingham County No 150.2 (133.8, 168.1) 23 (7, 36) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Latah County No 133.0 (116.9, 150.7) 31 (16, 39) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Payette County No 172.9 (151.4, 197.0) 6 (2, 27) 50 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Elmore County No 186.7 (162.4, 213.7) 3 (1, 22) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Idaho County No 140.5 (121.9, 162.1) 29 (9, 39) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Gem County No 150.3 (129.4, 174.3) 22 (5, 37) 40 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Shoshone County No 199.8 (171.1, 232.7) 2 (1, 18) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Minidoka County No 159.9 (134.8, 188.9) 17 (2, 35) 32 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Jefferson County No 128.3 (108.4, 150.7) 34 (14, 41) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Cassia County No 135.6 (114.7, 159.5) 30 (9, 40) 31 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Gooding County No 171.9 (145.2, 203.2) 7 (2, 33) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Clearwater County No 181.1 (151.0, 217.3) 4 (1, 29) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Jerome County No 147.1 (123.5, 174.3) 24 (4, 38) 29 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Boundary County No 160.6 (133.6, 192.3) 16 (2, 36) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Blaine County Yes 100.7 (83.5, 121.0) 41 (33, 43) 27 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Washington County No 168.7 (140.1, 203.2) 9 (1, 35) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Lemhi County No 140.6 (114.2, 173.6) 28 (4, 41) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Benewah County No 161.6 (132.0, 197.5) 15 (2, 37) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Valley County No 123.7 (99.7, 153.0) 36 (13, 43) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Madison County Yes 100.1 (81.3, 121.7) 42 (31, 43) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Owyhee County No 162.9 (130.7, 201.6) 14 (2, 37) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Fremont County No 127.6 (103.1, 156.7) 35 (10, 42) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Franklin County Yes 110.9 (87.3, 139.0) 39 (22, 43) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Custer County No 179.0 (136.4, 235.2) 5 (1, 37) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Boise County Yes 102.6 (77.0, 136.5) 40 (22, 43) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Adams County No 153.6 (114.4, 207.1) 20 (1, 42) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Bear Lake County No 132.4 (99.2, 174.6) 33 (4, 43) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Caribou County Yes 122.2 (91.6, 160.8) 37 (8, 43) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Teton County Yes 114.6 (83.9, 152.5) 38 (10, 43) 11
*
*
Power County No 132.8 (97.4, 178.9) 32 (3, 43) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Lewis County No 146.3 (102.4, 206.9) 25 (1, 43) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Lincoln County No 164.7 (115.2, 229.8) 11 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Butte County No 170.3 (111.2, 253.4) 8 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Oneida County Yes 80.5 (52.4, 121.1) 43 (32, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Camas County No 303.0 (171.6, 503.9) 1 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Clark County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 8:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top