Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A Yes 44.8 (44.2, 45.3) N/A 6,293 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -2.1)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Kendall County Urban Yes 33.3 (29.0, 38.1) 97 (82, 97) 43 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -1.9)
DuPage County Urban Yes 33.7 (32.1, 35.4) 96 (89, 97) 355 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.7, -2.3)
Lake County Urban Yes 35.5 (33.6, 37.5) 95 (85, 97) 284 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.1)
Monroe County Urban Yes 35.8 (27.6, 45.9) 94 (58, 97) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Henderson County Rural Yes 38.0 (19.5, 69.3) 93 (3, 97) 3 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Kane County Urban Yes 38.7 (36.4, 41.1) 92 (77, 94) 218 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.2, 3.6)
McHenry County Urban Yes 38.9 (36.0, 42.0) 91 (74, 95) 146 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Piatt County Urban Yes 39.0 (26.8, 55.4) 90 (17, 97) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Jo Daviess County Rural Yes 40.2 (28.7, 55.4) 89 (17, 97) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Will County Urban Yes 40.4 (38.4, 42.5) 88 (74, 92) 320 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Boone County Urban Yes 40.7 (33.7, 48.9) 87 (47, 97) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Hancock County Rural Yes 41.4 (29.6, 57.1) 86 (18, 97) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.8)
Champaign County Urban Yes 42.0 (37.7, 46.7) 85 (60, 94) 74 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Shelby County Rural Yes 42.9 (32.2, 56.7) 84 (19, 97) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Cook County Urban Yes 43.0 (42.2, 43.8) 83 (69, 87) 2,388 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.6, -2.4)
Crawford County Rural Yes 43.7 (32.0, 58.8) 82 (12, 97) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
McLean County Urban Yes 43.7 (39.2, 48.6) 81 (54, 93) 74 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Clinton County Urban Yes 45.9 (36.7, 56.8) 80 (18, 97) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Fayette County Rural Yes 46.3 (34.7, 60.9) 79 (8, 97) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Woodford County Urban Yes 46.3 (37.2, 57.1) 78 (20, 97) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Ford County Urban Yes 46.8 (32.9, 65.5) 77 (4, 97) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Bond County Urban Yes 46.8 (33.2, 64.7) 76 (5, 97) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Menard County Urban Yes 47.2 (31.8, 68.3) 75 (3, 97) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Wayne County Rural Yes 47.6 (33.8, 65.8) 74 (5, 97) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Logan County Rural Yes 48.2 (37.6, 61.2) 73 (10, 97) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Tazewell County Urban Yes 48.8 (43.7, 54.4) 72 (30, 85) 73 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Marshall County Urban Yes 48.8 (32.5, 71.5) 71 (2, 97) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Moultrie County Rural Yes 48.8 (34.2, 68.1) 70 (4, 97) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Lee County Rural Yes 48.8 (39.2, 60.4) 69 (13, 95) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Coles County Rural Yes 49.1 (40.3, 59.5) 68 (13, 93) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Washington County Rural Yes 49.3 (34.0, 69.7) 67 (2, 97) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Jasper County Rural Yes 49.3 (32.9, 72.6) 66 (2, 97) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.3)
Grundy County Urban Yes 49.5 (41.7, 58.4) 65 (16, 91) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Effingham County Rural Yes 49.5 (39.7, 61.2) 64 (11, 94) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Rock Island County Urban Yes 50.2 (45.2, 55.7) 63 (25, 82) 81 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
DeKalb County Urban Yes 50.2 (43.9, 57.3) 62 (18, 87) 48 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 10.0)
Sangamon County Urban Yes 50.9 (46.6, 55.5) 61 (29, 78) 116 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Saline County Rural Yes 50.9 (39.3, 65.2) 60 (7, 95) 15 falling falling trend -13.0 (-30.7, -3.6)
White County Rural Yes 51.0 (35.8, 71.5) 59 (2, 97) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Whiteside County Rural Yes 51.1 (43.5, 59.8) 58 (15, 88) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Bureau County Rural Yes 51.8 (42.1, 63.5) 57 (8, 92) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
St. Clair County Urban Yes 52.0 (48.2, 56.0) 56 (28, 74) 152 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Williamson County Rural Yes 52.4 (45.3, 60.5) 55 (13, 86) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Johnson County Rural Yes 53.0 (37.6, 73.5) 54 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Cumberland County Rural Yes 53.0 (35.4, 77.3) 53 (1, 97) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Douglas County Rural Yes 53.6 (39.6, 71.2) 52 (2, 96) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
McDonough County Rural Yes 53.6 (40.8, 69.4) 51 (3, 95) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Henry County Urban Yes 53.8 (45.2, 63.7) 50 (8, 86) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Winnebago County Urban Yes 53.8 (50.2, 57.8) 49 (23, 69) 173 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Pulaski County Rural Yes 53.9 (30.5, 91.2) 48 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Madison County Urban Yes 54.0 (50.2, 58.0) 47 (21, 68) 170 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Knox County Rural Yes 54.1 (45.2, 64.3) 46 (6, 86) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Stephenson County Rural Yes 54.9 (45.1, 66.4) 45 (5, 88) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 55.2 (43.9, 68.7) 44 (4, 91) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Jersey County Urban Yes 55.2 (42.6, 70.9) 43 (3, 94) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Clark County Rural Yes 55.6 (39.9, 75.7) 42 (1, 96) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Wabash County Rural Yes 55.8 (37.2, 80.9) 41 (1, 97) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Christian County Rural Yes 55.9 (45.6, 68.1) 40 (4, 86) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Union County Rural Yes 56.2 (41.2, 75.3) 39 (1, 95) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Cass County Rural Yes 56.2 (39.1, 78.7) 38 (1, 97) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Livingston County Rural Yes 56.6 (46.4, 68.6) 37 (4, 85) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Macon County Urban Yes 56.7 (50.4, 63.7) 36 (9, 72) 65 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Mercer County Urban Yes 56.9 (42.2, 75.8) 35 (1, 94) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Kankakee County Urban Yes 56.9 (50.7, 63.6) 34 (9, 70) 68 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.1, 3.1)
Randolph County Rural Yes 57.7 (46.8, 70.8) 33 (2, 85) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Richland County Rural Yes 57.8 (42.2, 77.8) 32 (1, 95) 10 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Schuyler County Rural Yes 57.8 (36.2, 90.0) 31 (1, 97) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.3)
Ogle County Rural Yes 57.8 (49.0, 68.0) 30 (5, 80) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Macoupin County Urban Yes 58.5 (49.1, 69.3) 29 (3, 78) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
La Salle County Rural Yes 59.0 (52.9, 65.6) 28 (8, 65) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Putnam County Rural Yes 59.0 (35.0, 96.2) 27 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Clay County Rural Yes 59.1 (41.8, 81.7) 26 (1, 96) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Carroll County Rural Yes 59.4 (43.7, 79.7) 25 (1, 94) 11 stable stable trend 6.8 (-2.3, 22.5)
Morgan County Rural Yes 60.1 (48.9, 73.4) 24 (2, 80) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Warren County Rural Yes 60.2 (43.8, 81.0) 23 (1, 95) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 60.3 (50.0, 72.4) 22 (2, 76) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Peoria County Urban Yes 60.4 (55.3, 65.8) 21 (7, 54) 113 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Iroquois County Rural Yes 60.5 (48.4, 74.9) 20 (1, 84) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Scott County Rural Yes 61.3 (34.0, 104.0) 19 (1, 97) 3
*
*
Hamilton County Rural Yes 61.5 (40.7, 90.7) 18 (1, 97) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.6)
Greene County Rural Yes 61.6 (44.3, 84.5) 17 (1, 94) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.0)
Alexander County Urban Yes 61.6 (35.7, 101.9) 16 (1, 97) 4 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.3, -0.1)
Fulton County Rural Yes 61.7 (50.7, 74.8) 15 (1, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Mason County Rural Yes 61.8 (44.3, 84.7) 14 (1, 94) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.9)
Adams County Rural Yes 62.5 (54.2, 71.8) 13 (3, 64) 46 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.7)
Edgar County Rural Yes 62.5 (47.3, 81.8) 12 (1, 91) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Pike County Rural Yes 62.8 (46.5, 83.7) 11 (1, 92) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
De Witt County Rural Yes 63.0 (47.5, 82.8) 10 (1, 89) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Perry County Rural Yes 63.2 (48.4, 81.3) 9 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Jackson County Rural Yes 63.3 (53.1, 74.9) 8 (1, 69) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Franklin County Rural Yes 68.3 (57.1, 81.3) 7 (1, 59) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Lawrence County Rural Yes 69.3 (52.1, 90.9) 6 (1, 83) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Massac County Urban Yes 71.0 (52.9, 93.9) 5 (1, 82) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Edwards County Rural Yes 72.1 (45.2, 110.6) 4 (1, 97) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.6)
Gallatin County Rural Yes 72.8 (42.9, 118.0) 3 (1, 97) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Marion County Rural Yes 74.0 (62.4, 87.2) 2 (1, 41) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Vermilion County Rural Yes 74.1 (65.7, 83.4) 1 (1, 27) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/09/2024 1:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top