Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 506.8 (503.8, 509.8) N/A 22,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.7)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Brown County Rural No 528.3 (396.9, 689.4) 74 (1, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Pope County Rural No 454.4 (342.4, 593.0) 98 (13, 102) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Scott County Rural No 601.6 (461.9, 770.5) 28 (1, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Hardin County Rural No 669.5 (512.9, 859.2) 6 (1, 101) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Calhoun County Urban No 613.5 (475.9, 778.9) 22 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Stark County Urban No 551.8 (432.0, 695.7) 57 (2, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Putnam County Rural No 552.5 (432.4, 695.9) 55 (1, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Gallatin County Rural No 660.8 (518.4, 830.4) 10 (1, 100) 15 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Schuyler County Rural No 481.1 (380.5, 600.6) 91 (8, 102) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Edwards County Rural No 602.9 (478.8, 749.5) 27 (1, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Henderson County Rural No 477.5 (381.8, 590.9) 92 (10, 102) 17 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Pulaski County Rural No 741.1 (594.9, 913.6) 2 (1, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Cumberland County Rural No 482.0 (393.2, 584.9) 90 (11, 102) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Alexander County Urban No 810.1 (662.8, 981.2) 1 (1, 42) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Hamilton County Rural No 595.6 (488.3, 720.0) 33 (1, 101) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Jasper County Rural No 551.0 (453.9, 663.2) 58 (3, 102) 23 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Cass County Rural No 539.2 (449.1, 641.9) 68 (5, 102) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Menard County Urban No 541.6 (455.1, 639.9) 67 (5, 102) 28 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Wabash County Rural No 552.5 (462.8, 654.7) 54 (3, 102) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Washington County Rural No 463.0 (389.4, 546.6) 94 (31, 102) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Marshall County Urban No 502.2 (422.8, 592.4) 85 (15, 102) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Johnson County Rural No 536.0 (452.8, 630.2) 71 (6, 102) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Greene County Rural No 634.7 (541.2, 740.0) 14 (1, 89) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Clay County Rural No 598.6 (510.2, 698.0) 31 (2, 97) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Piatt County Urban No 486.1 (416.0, 564.6) 88 (26, 102) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Moultrie County Rural No 612.0 (523.3, 711.4) 23 (1, 93) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Bond County Urban No 545.1 (467.0, 632.7) 65 (6, 101) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Massac County Urban No 562.1 (482.2, 651.5) 50 (4, 101) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
White County Rural No 528.0 (453.2, 612.0) 75 (11, 102) 37 falling falling trend -3.3 (-12.8, -0.9)
Ford County Urban No 667.3 (573.7, 772.0) 7 (1, 82) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Lawrence County Rural No 654.9 (565.1, 755.0) 11 (1, 78) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Clark County Rural No 603.5 (521.0, 695.3) 26 (2, 93) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Richland County Rural No 576.6 (497.5, 664.8) 40 (4, 98) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Hancock County Rural No 452.8 (391.4, 521.3) 99 (47, 102) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Wayne County Rural No 527.4 (456.8, 606.2) 76 (13, 102) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
De Witt County Rural No 627.9 (543.6, 721.6) 16 (1, 85) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Mason County Rural No 665.1 (576.4, 763.9) 8 (1, 69) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Warren County Rural No 598.8 (519.5, 686.9) 30 (2, 91) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Mercer County Urban No 598.9 (520.5, 685.9) 29 (2, 88) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Carroll County Rural No 569.9 (495.1, 652.9) 44 (4, 100) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Douglas County Rural No 559.8 (486.9, 640.7) 53 (5, 99) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Pike County Rural No 661.6 (576.3, 756.2) 9 (1, 73) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Union County Rural No 547.5 (477.0, 625.6) 62 (9, 101) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Perry County Rural No 512.6 (446.9, 585.2) 81 (17, 102) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Edgar County Rural No 566.9 (495.6, 645.9) 47 (5, 97) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Fayette County Rural No 544.5 (476.5, 619.7) 66 (9, 100) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Crawford County Rural No 630.4 (553.3, 715.4) 15 (1, 82) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.0)
McDonough County Rural No 492.8 (433.5, 557.9) 87 (34, 102) 52 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Jersey County Urban No 620.6 (549.5, 698.4) 20 (2, 79) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 468.3 (415.5, 526.1) 93 (53, 102) 60 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Shelby County Rural No 582.9 (518.2, 653.7) 36 (5, 88) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Monroe County Urban No 448.9 (399.7, 502.5) 100 (65, 102) 63 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Saline County Rural No 616.5 (550.2, 688.5) 21 (2, 79) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Clinton County Urban No 458.9 (409.7, 512.3) 97 (61, 102) 65 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.9, -1.3)
Effingham County Rural No 527.3 (473.3, 585.8) 77 (19, 98) 71 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Logan County Rural No 625.4 (561.5, 694.6) 17 (2, 76) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Montgomery County Rural No 611.4 (550.5, 677.3) 24 (3, 81) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Woodford County Urban No 505.6 (455.6, 559.6) 83 (32, 101) 78 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Randolph County Rural No 594.8 (536.6, 657.6) 34 (4, 85) 79 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lee County Rural No 549.3 (496.6, 606.1) 60 (16, 93) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Iroquois County Rural No 642.7 (581.2, 709.0) 13 (1, 64) 82 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
Christian County Rural No 593.7 (538.3, 653.2) 35 (6, 82) 86 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Morgan County Rural No 609.1 (552.3, 670.1) 25 (4, 80) 87 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Livingston County Rural No 578.0 (524.0, 636.0) 39 (9, 86) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Bureau County Rural No 560.4 (508.5, 616.1) 51 (12, 90) 88 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Boone County Urban No 504.1 (459.1, 552.4) 84 (36, 100) 94 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.6)
Jefferson County Rural No 623.3 (567.8, 682.7) 18 (3, 68) 95 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Coles County Rural No 539.0 (491.5, 589.9) 69 (20, 94) 97 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Grundy County Urban No 596.7 (544.4, 652.6) 32 (5, 79) 99 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 563.3 (514.0, 616.0) 49 (12, 89) 100 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Fulton County Rural No 685.1 (626.0, 748.3) 4 (1, 36) 101 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Franklin County Rural No 645.4 (590.9, 703.6) 12 (2, 58) 105 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Marion County Rural No 689.8 (632.4, 751.2) 3 (1, 34) 109 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Macoupin County Urban No 573.5 (526.6, 623.5) 43 (11, 86) 114 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Stephenson County Rural No 524.3 (481.3, 570.2) 79 (28, 95) 114 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Henry County Urban No 538.4 (494.8, 584.8) 70 (23, 93) 116 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Ogle County Rural No 545.6 (501.8, 592.3) 64 (19, 91) 116 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Knox County Rural No 575.0 (531.0, 621.8) 42 (13, 83) 130 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Whiteside County Rural No 578.6 (536.8, 622.9) 38 (12, 83) 145 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Williamson County Rural No 550.4 (511.4, 591.7) 59 (19, 89) 150 falling falling trend -3.1 (-7.6, -1.5)
Kendall County Urban No 494.4 (458.7, 532.0) 86 (52, 100) 151 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Adams County Rural No 567.6 (528.3, 609.1) 46 (15, 83) 161 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
DeKalb County Urban No 565.3 (526.8, 605.8) 48 (19, 83) 165 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Vermilion County Rural No 672.9 (632.1, 715.6) 5 (2, 29) 208 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Kankakee County Urban No 578.7 (545.3, 613.6) 37 (16, 75) 230 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Macon County Urban No 567.8 (536.3, 600.6) 45 (19, 78) 252 falling falling trend -1.4 (-5.4, -0.8)
Champaign County Urban No 442.1 (417.9, 467.3) 101 (86, 102) 259 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.6)
McLean County Urban No 508.8 (481.1, 537.7) 82 (53, 94) 261 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
La Salle County Rural No 622.4 (589.8, 656.2) 19 (7, 48) 282 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Tazewell County Urban No 546.1 (518.2, 575.1) 63 (31, 85) 294 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Rock Island County Urban No 535.2 (508.9, 562.5) 72 (37, 87) 318 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Peoria County Urban No 548.7 (523.7, 574.6) 61 (29, 83) 371 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Sangamon County Urban No 529.6 (506.5, 553.4) 73 (44, 86) 408 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.7, -1.5)
St. Clair County Urban No 559.9 (537.9, 582.5) 52 (29, 75) 509 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
McHenry County Urban No 519.2 (499.3, 539.8) 80 (53, 90) 536 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.7)
Madison County Urban No 575.1 (554.2, 596.6) 41 (23, 67) 585 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.8)
Winnebago County Urban No 552.2 (532.5, 572.6) 56 (34, 77) 603 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.9, -1.0)
Kane County Urban No 459.2 (444.4, 474.5) 96 (85, 101) 745 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
Lake County Urban No 462.3 (449.7, 475.1) 95 (85, 100) 1,066 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.7)
Will County Urban No 524.5 (510.4, 539.0) 78 (56, 85) 1,088 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
DuPage County Urban No 427.0 (416.9, 437.3) 102 (94, 102) 1,396 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -1.7)
Cook County Urban No 482.3 (477.6, 487.0) 89 (80, 95) 8,340 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 5:03 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top