Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois No 183.3 (181.9, 184.8) N/A 12,356 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Edwards County No 161.1 (111.9, 227.2) 97 (6, 102) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Pope County No 185.2 (126.3, 272.1) 71 (2, 102) 7
*
*
Scott County No 240.7 (169.5, 334.7) 12 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Putnam County No 164.5 (116.1, 230.9) 92 (8, 102) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Calhoun County No 217.1 (154.8, 301.2) 33 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Gallatin County No 235.5 (166.9, 326.3) 18 (1, 102) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Henderson County No 129.8 (93.0, 181.6) 102 (46, 102) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Brown County No 248.3 (179.4, 335.2) 9 (1, 100) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Hardin County No 260.9 (184.6, 365.0) 5 (1, 100) 9 stable stable trend -25.3 (-51.2, 14.5)
Pulaski County No 218.4 (158.2, 298.1) 31 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Stark County No 240.5 (176.6, 323.7) 13 (1, 101) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Schuyler County No 196.7 (147.1, 260.5) 55 (3, 102) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Jasper County No 162.5 (122.6, 213.0) 95 (18, 102) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Cumberland County No 179.6 (137.6, 231.5) 79 (8, 102) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Alexander County No 290.5 (223.2, 375.3) 3 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Hamilton County No 248.1 (192.2, 317.1) 10 (1, 95) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Menard County No 185.9 (144.8, 236.1) 70 (6, 102) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Wabash County No 182.3 (142.5, 231.0) 75 (7, 102) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Washington County No 154.3 (121.0, 195.1) 99 (33, 102) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Cass County No 228.0 (180.4, 284.7) 22 (1, 98) 16 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Greene County No 184.4 (146.0, 230.7) 72 (9, 102) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Johnson County No 189.7 (151.8, 235.3) 65 (7, 101) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Clay County No 219.4 (176.7, 270.2) 29 (2, 98) 19 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Wayne County No 163.6 (132.5, 200.8) 94 (27, 102) 20 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
De Witt County No 192.1 (155.3, 235.8) 62 (7, 101) 20 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Bond County No 190.0 (154.0, 232.5) 63 (10, 102) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Massac County No 203.7 (165.1, 249.8) 44 (5, 99) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Marshall County No 235.4 (191.3, 288.1) 19 (1, 93) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Piatt County No 187.8 (152.8, 229.1) 69 (9, 102) 21 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Richland County No 196.2 (159.7, 239.2) 56 (7, 101) 21 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
White County No 219.4 (178.9, 267.4) 30 (2, 96) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Carroll County No 183.6 (149.0, 225.1) 73 (11, 102) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Clark County No 225.2 (184.0, 273.3) 23 (2, 92) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Moultrie County No 240.2 (196.8, 290.9) 14 (1, 87) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Hancock County No 165.9 (135.5, 202.0) 89 (27, 102) 23 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Crawford County No 188.3 (155.1, 227.0) 68 (11, 101) 23 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Douglas County No 196.7 (162.2, 236.7) 54 (7, 100) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Perry County No 179.1 (148.1, 215.0) 81 (19, 102) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Ford County No 295.4 (244.1, 355.0) 1 (1, 36) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Warren County No 221.5 (183.0, 266.2) 26 (2, 93) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Lawrence County No 262.8 (218.4, 313.9) 4 (1, 66) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Mercer County No 215.9 (179.4, 258.9) 37 (4, 96) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Edgar County No 206.8 (172.0, 247.5) 40 (5, 98) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Jersey County No 175.8 (146.5, 210.0) 83 (23, 101) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Union County No 212.8 (177.1, 254.6) 38 (4, 95) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Pike County No 251.5 (210.4, 299.1) 6 (1, 73) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Monroe County No 131.9 (110.7, 156.3) 101 (84, 102) 29 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Mason County No 292.3 (245.5, 346.6) 2 (1, 35) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Fayette County No 200.6 (169.0, 237.0) 49 (9, 99) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Shelby County No 179.1 (151.1, 211.6) 80 (18, 101) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
McDonough County No 182.9 (154.3, 215.6) 74 (19, 101) 31 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.1)
Effingham County No 173.8 (148.3, 202.6) 87 (30, 101) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jo Daviess County No 189.2 (161.3, 221.6) 66 (15, 99) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Saline County No 240.7 (206.4, 279.4) 11 (1, 68) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Clinton County No 164.1 (141.0, 190.1) 93 (44, 102) 37 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Logan County No 235.7 (204.1, 271.0) 17 (3, 73) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Randolph County No 201.9 (175.1, 231.8) 47 (8, 94) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Iroquois County No 224.8 (195.7, 257.6) 24 (4, 82) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Montgomery County No 236.1 (206.1, 269.6) 16 (2, 67) 46 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Woodford County No 195.5 (170.6, 223.1) 57 (14, 97) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Christian County No 206.1 (180.1, 235.1) 42 (10, 89) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Livingston County No 202.4 (176.8, 230.8) 46 (11, 93) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Coles County No 164.8 (144.1, 187.9) 91 (48, 101) 47 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Morgan County No 223.4 (195.7, 254.2) 25 (4, 79) 49 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Boone County No 167.1 (146.4, 189.9) 88 (43, 101) 50 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Jackson County No 175.0 (153.5, 198.6) 85 (37, 100) 51 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Bureau County No 209.4 (184.1, 237.6) 39 (10, 89) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lee County No 216.7 (190.8, 245.5) 35 (7, 85) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Grundy County No 216.9 (190.3, 245.9) 34 (7, 85) 53 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Jefferson County No 217.8 (192.2, 246.1) 32 (6, 81) 54 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Franklin County No 220.6 (195.6, 248.3) 27 (6, 76) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Fulton County No 250.5 (222.6, 281.3) 7 (2, 45) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Henry County No 175.7 (156.1, 197.5) 84 (39, 100) 60 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Marion County No 248.4 (220.8, 278.7) 8 (1, 45) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Ogle County No 189.2 (168.5, 211.9) 67 (25, 96) 64 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Stephenson County No 199.8 (178.1, 223.7) 50 (16, 90) 66 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Knox County No 205.3 (184.2, 228.4) 43 (13, 84) 72 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Macoupin County No 240.0 (215.5, 266.7) 15 (3, 51) 74 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Whiteside County No 196.7 (177.2, 218.0) 53 (20, 91) 78 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Kendall County No 181.5 (163.3, 200.9) 77 (34, 98) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Adams County No 180.0 (162.8, 198.8) 78 (38, 97) 84 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
DeKalb County No 192.9 (174.8, 212.4) 61 (24, 92) 88 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Williamson County No 220.1 (200.4, 241.5) 28 (8, 66) 94 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Vermilion County No 231.0 (212.1, 251.3) 20 (6, 50) 115 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Kankakee County No 202.8 (187.4, 219.3) 45 (21, 80) 132 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
McLean County No 174.6 (161.3, 188.6) 86 (52, 97) 135 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Champaign County No 161.0 (149.3, 173.4) 98 (71, 101) 147 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Macon County No 216.6 (200.9, 233.3) 36 (13, 64) 148 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Tazewell County No 194.4 (181.0, 208.5) 58 (31, 84) 163 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
La Salle County No 230.6 (214.7, 247.3) 21 (7, 46) 165 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Rock Island County No 193.1 (180.3, 206.7) 60 (33, 85) 176 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Peoria County No 206.7 (194.2, 220.0) 41 (21, 70) 210 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Sangamon County No 193.5 (181.9, 205.8) 59 (34, 84) 217 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
St. Clair County No 199.3 (188.5, 210.4) 51 (29, 75) 276 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
McHenry County No 181.8 (172.0, 192.1) 76 (50, 90) 282 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.9)
Madison County No 201.9 (191.7, 212.4) 48 (28, 71) 311 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Winnebago County No 197.6 (188.0, 207.6) 52 (33, 75) 332 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Kane County No 162.2 (155.0, 169.7) 96 (78, 100) 408 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Lake County No 165.9 (159.7, 172.3) 90 (76, 98) 576 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Will County No 189.9 (182.8, 197.2) 64 (44, 79) 589 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
DuPage County No 153.9 (148.9, 159.2) 100 (88, 101) 738 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Cook County No 177.7 (175.3, 180.1) 82 (67, 87) 4,480 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 5:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top