Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois No 135.7 (134.5, 136.8) N/A 11,712 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Calhoun County Yes 101.5 (64.7, 159.9) 102 (5, 102) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Pope County No 137.0 (84.1, 222.7) 61 (1, 102) 5
*
*
Stark County Yes 114.7 (70.6, 179.5) 97 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Hardin County No 161.6 (108.8, 241.5) 16 (1, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Putnam County No 125.7 (83.1, 187.3) 87 (2, 102) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Brown County No 164.8 (111.2, 239.8) 13 (1, 102) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Schuyler County Yes 122.2 (83.6, 176.7) 91 (3, 102) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Scott County No 179.8 (123.7, 256.8) 3 (1, 102) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3)
Alexander County No 142.5 (98.4, 203.6) 47 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Edwards County No 146.8 (103.3, 205.8) 39 (1, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Jasper County Yes 106.4 (75.9, 147.4) 101 (17, 102) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Gallatin County No 207.5 (145.8, 290.4) 2 (1, 98) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Hamilton County No 130.5 (94.0, 179.3) 80 (2, 102) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Henderson County No 163.0 (114.3, 228.4) 15 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Pulaski County No 212.3 (152.9, 290.5) 1 (1, 94) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Cumberland County No 133.4 (98.8, 177.6) 74 (3, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Menard County No 135.7 (102.7, 177.1) 63 (2, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Cass County No 148.2 (113.3, 191.5) 35 (1, 101) 13 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Johnson County No 135.2 (102.9, 176.4) 66 (3, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Moultrie County No 126.0 (96.4, 162.6) 86 (6, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Wabash County No 128.7 (97.8, 168.2) 84 (5, 102) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Washington County No 123.6 (95.9, 158.2) 88 (10, 102) 14 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Marshall County No 146.6 (114.2, 187.5) 41 (2, 101) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Ford County No 136.4 (107.2, 172.7) 62 (4, 102) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Clay County No 150.1 (117.8, 189.8) 29 (2, 101) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Greene County No 159.0 (125.7, 200.1) 19 (1, 97) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Lawrence County No 140.7 (111.0, 177.3) 50 (2, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Piatt County No 133.6 (105.2, 168.2) 73 (5, 102) 17 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Warren County No 127.3 (99.6, 161.0) 85 (8, 102) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Clark County No 133.0 (104.7, 167.6) 75 (4, 102) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Massac County No 141.7 (111.8, 178.4) 48 (3, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Richland County No 134.4 (106.4, 168.7) 70 (4, 102) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Bond County No 142.8 (113.2, 178.8) 46 (3, 102) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Carroll County No 137.5 (108.6, 173.4) 60 (4, 102) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
White County No 148.2 (119.0, 184.2) 36 (2, 100) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Pike County No 138.2 (111.4, 170.9) 57 (5, 102) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Hancock County Yes 117.5 (94.9, 145.3) 96 (21, 102) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Union County No 146.7 (118.9, 180.3) 40 (2, 100) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Edgar County No 134.2 (108.2, 165.8) 72 (5, 102) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Douglas County No 154.6 (125.2, 189.4) 25 (1, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Mason County No 176.9 (143.0, 217.9) 6 (1, 82) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Mercer County No 158.9 (129.6, 194.4) 20 (1, 95) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Wayne County No 155.0 (125.2, 190.7) 24 (1, 99) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Fayette County No 130.5 (106.1, 159.6) 81 (7, 102) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
De Witt County No 174.6 (142.6, 212.7) 7 (1, 86) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Shelby County Yes 111.6 (91.4, 136.2) 99 (39, 102) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Perry County No 149.0 (121.5, 181.8) 33 (2, 100) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Jo Daviess County Yes 107.8 (89.0, 131.0) 100 (48, 102) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Crawford County No 171.5 (142.3, 205.9) 8 (1, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Jersey County No 160.2 (133.6, 191.3) 18 (1, 91) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Monroe County Yes 122.5 (103.3, 144.6) 90 (24, 102) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Effingham County Yes 121.7 (103.0, 143.3) 92 (26, 102) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
McDonough County No 149.2 (125.5, 176.5) 32 (4, 96) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Montgomery County No 129.6 (109.2, 153.4) 82 (13, 102) 32 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Clinton County No 129.3 (109.6, 151.8) 83 (18, 101) 33 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Saline County No 178.5 (152.3, 208.7) 4 (1, 64) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Logan County No 166.2 (141.8, 194.1) 11 (1, 84) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Randolph County No 147.6 (126.1, 172.4) 38 (5, 95) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Woodford County No 132.4 (113.1, 154.2) 76 (16, 100) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Lee County No 151.6 (130.3, 175.9) 27 (3, 90) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Jefferson County No 138.8 (119.7, 160.5) 52 (9, 97) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Bureau County No 138.4 (119.0, 160.6) 55 (9, 98) 41 stable stable trend 4.7 (-4.2, 14.5)
Morgan County No 144.9 (124.7, 168.1) 44 (6, 95) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Iroquois County No 171.3 (147.3, 198.8) 9 (1, 69) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Boone County No 122.7 (106.5, 140.8) 89 (30, 102) 42 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Fulton County No 157.6 (136.2, 181.9) 21 (2, 83) 44 stable stable trend 9.1 (-9.5, 31.7)
Christian County No 168.0 (145.9, 193.1) 10 (1, 72) 45 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Livingston County No 160.6 (139.5, 184.3) 17 (2, 77) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Franklin County No 147.7 (128.6, 169.2) 37 (6, 93) 46 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Grundy County No 154.1 (134.8, 175.6) 26 (4, 85) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Jackson County No 138.5 (120.9, 158.0) 54 (13, 97) 50 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Coles County No 138.4 (121.0, 157.8) 56 (13, 97) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Macoupin County No 134.9 (118.2, 153.6) 69 (14, 98) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Marion County No 177.2 (155.5, 201.5) 5 (1, 52) 53 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Stephenson County No 132.4 (116.0, 150.7) 77 (19, 99) 54 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Henry County No 137.5 (121.3, 155.7) 59 (14, 96) 56 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Ogle County No 156.9 (139.3, 176.3) 22 (3, 78) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Knox County No 149.7 (132.6, 168.6) 31 (7, 85) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Whiteside County No 145.6 (130.0, 162.9) 43 (9, 87) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Williamson County No 134.4 (120.3, 149.9) 71 (21, 97) 70 falling falling trend -4.8 (-9.0, -0.4)
Kendall County Yes 121.5 (108.8, 135.2) 93 (46, 101) 70 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Adams County No 137.6 (123.0, 153.6) 58 (16, 96) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
DeKalb County No 150.2 (136.0, 165.4) 28 (6, 79) 86 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Vermilion County No 164.1 (149.4, 180.0) 14 (3, 52) 98 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Macon County No 141.2 (129.8, 153.5) 49 (18, 86) 123 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Kankakee County No 165.7 (152.6, 179.8) 12 (3, 46) 124 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
McLean County No 130.6 (120.4, 141.5) 79 (34, 95) 128 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Champaign County Yes 114.0 (105.1, 123.4) 98 (73, 102) 130 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
La Salle County No 155.4 (143.3, 168.3) 23 (7, 64) 133 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Tazewell County No 135.5 (125.4, 146.5) 64 (26, 90) 140 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Rock Island County No 138.8 (128.8, 149.4) 53 (25, 86) 157 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Peoria County No 143.6 (134.2, 153.6) 45 (20, 79) 183 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Sangamon County No 139.4 (130.8, 148.5) 51 (25, 84) 209 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
McHenry County No 135.1 (127.7, 142.9) 67 (37, 85) 259 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.8)
St. Clair County No 148.3 (140.3, 156.7) 34 (17, 65) 272 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Madison County No 146.2 (138.5, 154.1) 42 (20, 68) 291 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Winnebago County No 149.9 (142.3, 157.9) 30 (16, 61) 307 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
Kane County Yes 118.9 (113.5, 124.5) 94 (74, 99) 372 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Will County No 135.0 (129.9, 140.3) 68 (44, 83) 534 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Lake County No 130.9 (126.0, 136.0) 78 (51, 87) 565 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
DuPage County Yes 118.7 (114.8, 122.7) 95 (77, 98) 740 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Cook County No 135.5 (133.7, 137.3) 65 (50, 76) 4,605 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2024 5:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top