Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 150.2 (149.3, 151.1) N/A 23,773 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.7)
United States N/A No 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) N/A 602,955 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
DuPage County Urban No 126.9 (124.0, 129.9) 102 (96, 102) 1,467 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -1.7)
Hancock County Rural No 132.8 (114.7, 153.6) 101 (51, 102) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Champaign County Urban No 133.0 (125.9, 140.4) 100 (86, 102) 275 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.6)
Monroe County Urban No 136.0 (121.3, 152.2) 99 (63, 102) 66 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Kane County Urban No 136.5 (132.2, 140.9) 98 (87, 101) 789 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Lake County Urban No 137.1 (133.5, 140.8) 97 (87, 101) 1,123 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -1.6)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 141.7 (125.2, 160.4) 96 (43, 102) 62 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Clinton County Urban No 142.3 (127.4, 158.6) 95 (48, 102) 70 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Cook County Urban No 143.1 (141.8, 144.5) 94 (81, 96) 8,794 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.4)
Kendall County Urban No 143.3 (133.3, 153.9) 93 (64, 101) 160 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Washington County Rural No 144.6 (121.8, 171.1) 92 (19, 102) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Schuyler County Rural No 144.7 (114.2, 182.5) 91 (9, 102) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Cumberland County Rural No 145.1 (118.6, 176.5) 90 (13, 102) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Henderson County Rural No 145.8 (115.5, 183.7) 89 (4, 102) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Piatt County Urban No 146.5 (125.5, 170.4) 88 (25, 102) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Boone County Urban No 147.1 (134.1, 161.0) 87 (43, 101) 98 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Pope County Rural No 147.5 (108.9, 201.4) 86 (2, 102) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Brown County Rural No 149.4 (112.5, 195.3) 85 (2, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
McLean County Urban No 149.5 (141.5, 157.8) 84 (58, 97) 273 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Woodford County Urban No 150.7 (135.9, 166.7) 83 (28, 101) 81 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
McHenry County Urban No 152.4 (146.6, 158.3) 82 (60, 91) 560 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 1.0)
McDonough County Rural No 153.0 (134.7, 173.4) 81 (19, 102) 55 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Will County Urban No 153.2 (149.2, 157.3) 80 (64, 90) 1,141 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.3)
Marshall County Urban No 154.2 (129.7, 182.8) 79 (8, 102) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Johnson County Rural No 156.7 (132.6, 184.6) 78 (9, 102) 31 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Effingham County Rural No 157.7 (141.7, 175.1) 77 (18, 99) 74 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Jasper County Rural No 157.9 (130.1, 191.0) 76 (5, 102) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Sangamon County Urban No 158.0 (151.2, 165.0) 75 (44, 88) 427 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.7, -1.5)
Rock Island County Urban No 158.4 (150.6, 166.5) 74 (39, 89) 330 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Henry County Urban No 159.2 (146.4, 173.0) 73 (23, 95) 120 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Wayne County Rural No 159.2 (137.7, 183.7) 72 (11, 102) 42 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Fayette County Rural No 159.9 (140.2, 182.0) 71 (10, 101) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Tazewell County Urban No 160.8 (152.6, 169.3) 70 (32, 88) 304 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Williamson County Rural No 160.9 (149.6, 172.9) 69 (26, 93) 155 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.7, -1.8)
White County Rural No 161.3 (138.2, 187.8) 68 (8, 101) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Coles County Rural No 161.5 (147.3, 176.7) 67 (18, 95) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Bureau County Rural No 162.0 (147.0, 178.4) 66 (15, 97) 90 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.5, -0.9)
Lee County Rural No 162.4 (146.9, 179.3) 65 (15, 95) 85 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Putnam County Rural No 162.6 (127.0, 207.2) 64 (2, 102) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Stephenson County Rural No 163.1 (149.5, 177.7) 63 (19, 92) 120 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Winnebago County Urban No 163.4 (157.6, 169.3) 62 (37, 78) 627 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.6, -1.1)
Bond County Urban No 164.1 (140.9, 190.4) 61 (6, 102) 38 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Menard County Urban No 164.1 (138.1, 194.2) 60 (4, 102) 30 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Cass County Rural No 166.1 (139.0, 197.3) 59 (3, 102) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
St. Clair County Urban No 166.2 (159.8, 172.8) 58 (30, 76) 534 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Ogle County Rural No 166.3 (153.0, 180.5) 57 (15, 90) 122 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Peoria County Urban No 166.3 (158.9, 174.0) 56 (27, 80) 392 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Shelby County Rural No 166.3 (147.8, 187.0) 55 (8, 97) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Perry County Rural No 166.5 (145.8, 189.7) 54 (6, 99) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Stark County Urban No 167.0 (130.5, 212.7) 53 (1, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
DeKalb County Urban No 167.2 (156.1, 178.9) 52 (17, 84) 173 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Whiteside County Rural No 167.3 (155.2, 180.3) 51 (17, 87) 148 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Wabash County Rural No 167.3 (140.1, 198.9) 50 (3, 101) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Union County Rural No 167.3 (145.8, 191.7) 49 (6, 99) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-7.1, -0.5)
Edgar County Rural No 168.9 (147.5, 193.1) 48 (6, 97) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Carroll County Rural No 169.0 (146.7, 194.3) 47 (4, 98) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Madison County Urban No 169.0 (163.0, 175.3) 46 (26, 70) 607 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Richland County Rural No 169.2 (146.0, 195.4) 45 (4, 99) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Adams County Rural No 169.9 (158.2, 182.4) 44 (14, 83) 167 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Jackson County Rural No 169.9 (155.3, 185.7) 43 (10, 88) 106 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Macon County Urban No 170.3 (160.9, 180.2) 42 (19, 77) 263 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.4, -1.0)
Douglas County Rural No 170.5 (148.6, 195.1) 41 (4, 98) 46 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Kankakee County Urban No 171.4 (161.6, 181.6) 40 (16, 75) 240 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Livingston County Rural No 171.6 (155.7, 188.9) 39 (8, 88) 90 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Knox County Rural No 172.6 (159.4, 186.8) 38 (11, 82) 135 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Macoupin County Urban No 173.0 (158.9, 188.2) 37 (9, 84) 119 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Grundy County Urban No 173.4 (158.5, 189.4) 36 (8, 84) 103 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Hamilton County Rural No 174.2 (142.8, 211.6) 35 (1, 102) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Randolph County Rural No 174.6 (157.6, 193.2) 34 (5, 87) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Massac County Urban No 175.9 (151.1, 204.1) 33 (2, 97) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Calhoun County Urban No 176.2 (136.3, 227.1) 32 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Mercer County Urban No 176.5 (153.4, 202.6) 31 (2, 93) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Christian County Rural No 177.8 (161.4, 195.7) 30 (5, 83) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Moultrie County Rural No 177.9 (152.3, 206.9) 29 (2, 97) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Montgomery County Rural No 178.6 (160.9, 198.1) 28 (5, 83) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Crawford County Rural No 179.2 (157.4, 203.7) 27 (2, 91) 50 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.3)
Clay County Rural No 179.5 (153.1, 209.7) 26 (2, 96) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Saline County Rural No 179.9 (160.6, 201.2) 25 (3, 84) 66 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Morgan County Rural No 182.3 (165.4, 200.6) 24 (3, 77) 90 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Jersey County Urban No 182.6 (161.7, 205.8) 23 (2, 86) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County Rural No 182.9 (166.7, 200.3) 22 (3, 75) 98 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Logan County Rural No 183.2 (164.6, 203.5) 21 (3, 76) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Edwards County Rural No 183.3 (145.7, 229.1) 20 (1, 102) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Clark County Rural No 183.6 (158.7, 211.7) 19 (1, 91) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
La Salle County Rural No 184.2 (174.7, 194.2) 18 (6, 48) 292 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
De Witt County Rural No 184.8 (160.2, 212.7) 17 (1, 88) 42 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Warren County Rural No 187.4 (162.8, 215.0) 16 (1, 86) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.0)
Greene County Rural No 187.9 (160.3, 219.6) 15 (1, 89) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Hardin County Rural No 191.2 (146.5, 249.6) 14 (1, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Iroquois County Rural No 191.3 (172.9, 211.4) 13 (2, 63) 85 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Pike County Rural No 193.4 (168.4, 221.6) 12 (1, 81) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Ford County Urban No 193.9 (166.8, 224.6) 11 (1, 86) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Lawrence County Rural No 194.3 (168.1, 223.9) 10 (1, 79) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Scott County Rural No 194.9 (150.6, 249.8) 9 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Franklin County Rural No 195.7 (179.3, 213.4) 8 (1, 49) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Vermilion County Rural No 199.6 (187.6, 212.3) 7 (1, 27) 216 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Mason County Rural No 199.8 (173.0, 230.2) 6 (1, 71) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Gallatin County Rural No 202.6 (159.1, 256.4) 5 (1, 101) 16 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Marion County Rural No 204.5 (187.5, 222.8) 4 (1, 32) 113 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Fulton County Rural No 205.6 (188.0, 224.6) 3 (1, 32) 106 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Pulaski County Rural No 215.5 (172.7, 267.7) 2 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Alexander County Urban No 240.6 (196.1, 294.3) 1 (1, 47) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 11:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top