Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A Yes 13.5 (13.2, 13.8) N/A 2,114 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -0.4)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Cook County Urban Yes 13.6 (13.2, 14.0) 56 (39, 61) 832 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.1)
DuPage County Urban Yes 11.3 (10.4, 12.2) 70 (55, 75) 130 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.3)
Will County Urban Yes 13.7 (12.5, 14.9) 55 (30, 65) 102 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.8)
Lake County Urban Yes 11.5 (10.4, 12.6) 68 (52, 75) 93 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.4)
Kane County Urban Yes 11.1 (9.9, 12.5) 72 (51, 76) 65 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.1)
Winnebago County Urban Yes 14.3 (12.6, 16.2) 50 (21, 65) 53 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Madison County Urban Yes 14.7 (12.9, 16.7) 41 (19, 64) 51 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
McHenry County Urban Yes 12.9 (11.2, 14.7) 61 (31, 72) 46 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
St. Clair County Urban Yes 13.4 (11.7, 15.4) 58 (26, 71) 43 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.4)
Peoria County Urban Yes 15.6 (13.4, 18.2) 33 (13, 62) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Tazewell County Urban Yes 15.2 (12.7, 18.0) 38 (13, 66) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Sangamon County Urban Yes 10.1 (8.4, 12.0) 76 (53, 78) 28 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
La Salle County Rural Yes 15.8 (13.1, 19.0) 30 (9, 65) 25 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.6)
McLean County Urban Yes 13.5 (11.1, 16.2) 57 (21, 74) 24 stable stable trend -1.9 (-12.9, 6.1)
Rock Island County Urban Yes 11.7 (9.6, 14.2) 67 (33, 77) 24 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.5)
Macon County Urban Yes 14.5 (11.8, 17.7) 45 (14, 71) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Champaign County Urban Yes 9.0 (7.2, 11.1) 77 (60, 78) 18 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.8)
Kankakee County Urban Yes 12.2 (9.7, 15.2) 66 (26, 77) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Vermilion County Rural Yes 15.3 (12.1, 19.2) 37 (9, 73) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Kendall County Urban Yes 13.7 (10.7, 17.2) 54 (14, 76) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -0.9)
DeKalb County Urban Yes 14.9 (11.7, 18.8) 39 (9, 73) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Williamson County Rural Yes 15.5 (12.2, 19.7) 34 (8, 74) 15 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)
Knox County Rural Yes 17.3 (13.1, 22.6) 22 (3, 72) 13 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.2)
Ogle County Rural Yes 17.1 (12.9, 22.3) 23 (3, 70) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.2)
Whiteside County Rural Yes 13.3 (9.9, 17.6) 60 (13, 77) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.4)
Franklin County Rural Yes 18.9 (14.2, 24.9) 15 (1, 66) 11 stable stable trend 5.0 (-2.6, 23.2)
Henry County Urban Yes 14.6 (11.0, 19.3) 42 (9, 75) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.5)
Macoupin County Urban Yes 16.2 (12.0, 21.6) 27 (3, 74) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Marion County Rural Yes 21.7 (16.1, 28.8) 3 (1, 57) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Adams County Rural Yes 10.7 (7.9, 14.3) 73 (27, 78) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.7)
Jackson County Rural Yes 15.9 (11.8, 21.2) 29 (4, 75) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.9)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 18.1 (13.4, 24.3) 18 (2, 71) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Boone County Urban Yes 14.5 (10.6, 19.4) 44 (7, 77) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.8)
Livingston County Rural Yes 17.9 (13.1, 24.1) 19 (1, 71) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Fulton County Rural Yes 17.0 (12.3, 23.2) 25 (3, 74) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Morgan County Rural Yes 17.3 (12.3, 23.9) 21 (2, 74) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.3)
Iroquois County Rural Yes 18.1 (12.8, 25.4) 17 (1, 73) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Coles County Rural Yes 12.4 (8.7, 17.4) 64 (12, 78) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.5)
Effingham County Rural Yes 17.0 (11.9, 23.7) 24 (2, 76) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.9)
McDonough County Rural Yes 19.7 (13.8, 27.7) 12 (1, 70) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Randolph County Rural Yes 15.8 (11.1, 22.1) 31 (3, 77) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Stephenson County Rural Yes 10.6 (7.3, 15.0) 74 (23, 78) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Grundy County Urban Yes 12.5 (8.8, 17.4) 63 (13, 78) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Lee County Rural Yes 13.7 (9.6, 19.4) 52 (7, 78) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Saline County Rural Yes 20.5 (14.1, 29.1) 11 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.2)
Shelby County Rural Yes 20.7 (14.2, 29.6) 10 (1, 71) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Christian County Rural Yes 13.4 (9.3, 19.0) 59 (8, 78) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Woodford County Urban Yes 12.9 (8.9, 18.2) 62 (10, 78) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Bureau County Rural Yes 12.4 (8.4, 17.9) 65 (11, 78) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 14.4 (9.8, 21.0) 46 (5, 78) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Richland County Rural Yes 27.5 (18.3, 40.0) 1 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Perry County Rural Yes 20.9 (13.9, 30.6) 7 (1, 74) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Mercer County Urban Yes 23.4 (15.5, 34.7) 2 (1, 70) 6
*
*
Clinton County Urban Yes 11.3 (7.4, 16.7) 69 (15, 78) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.9)
Edgar County Rural Yes 21.5 (13.9, 32.2) 6 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Jo Daviess County Rural Yes 14.3 (8.7, 22.6) 49 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Pike County Rural Yes 21.5 (13.7, 32.9) 5 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Crawford County Rural Yes 19.1 (12.2, 29.0) 14 (1, 77) 5
*
*
Clark County Rural Yes 20.8 (13.3, 31.7) 8 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.3)
Fayette County Rural Yes 16.9 (10.5, 25.9) 26 (1, 78) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.9)
Hancock County Rural Yes 13.7 (8.7, 21.6) 53 (5, 78) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.8)
Logan County Rural Yes 11.2 (7.0, 17.3) 71 (13, 78) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.6)
Union County Rural Yes 15.8 (9.9, 24.7) 32 (1, 78) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.9)
Moultrie County Rural Yes 20.7 (12.8, 32.4) 9 (1, 76) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Ford County Urban Yes 21.5 (13.0, 34.0) 4 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.2)
Lawrence County Rural Yes 18.8 (11.5, 29.6) 16 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.7)
Monroe County Urban Yes 7.6 (4.5, 12.2) 78 (49, 78) 4 falling falling trend -8.7 (-36.8, -5.1)
Wayne County Rural Yes 14.4 (8.5, 23.7) 47 (2, 78) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Bond County Urban Yes 16.2 (9.4, 26.5) 28 (1, 78) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.1)
Clay County Rural Yes 19.5 (11.1, 32.2) 13 (1, 78) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.1)
De Witt County Rural Yes 15.5 (8.8, 25.8) 35 (1, 78) 3 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Johnson County Rural Yes 17.6 (10.1, 29.4) 20 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Mason County Rural Yes 15.3 (8.8, 25.9) 36 (1, 78) 3
*
*
White County Rural Yes 14.9 (8.4, 25.4) 40 (1, 78) 3 falling falling trend -6.5 (-39.8, -2.8)
Jersey County Urban Yes 10.3 (5.8, 17.5) 75 (14, 78) 3
*
*
Piatt County Urban Yes 14.0 (7.7, 23.8) 51 (2, 78) 3 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.6)
Warren County Rural Yes 14.5 (8.1, 24.4) 43 (2, 78) 3 falling falling trend -4.3 (-22.7, -2.3)
Washington County Rural Yes 14.4 (8.1, 24.6) 48 (2, 78) 3 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.2)
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/14/2024 1:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top