Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A *** 11.7 (11.5, 12.0) N/A 1,881 rising rising trend 0.2 (0.1, 0.3)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Adams County Rural *** 15.1 (11.6, 19.4) 8 (1, 55) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7)
Boone County Urban *** 11.7 (8.4, 16.1) 33 (4, 66) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.6)
Bureau County Rural *** 14.9 (10.5, 20.9) 10 (1, 63) 8
*
*
Carroll County Rural *** 11.1 (6.3, 19.3) 47 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Champaign County Urban *** 11.9 (9.9, 14.2) 30 (8, 61) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.5)
Christian County Rural *** 10.5 (7.0, 15.6) 55 (6, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Clinton County Urban *** 11.0 (7.2, 16.2) 48 (4, 66) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.4)
Coles County Rural *** 9.7 (6.6, 13.9) 60 (11, 66) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.5)
Cook County Urban *** 11.9 (11.5, 12.3) 31 (23, 46) 737 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
Crawford County Rural *** 16.7 (10.6, 25.6) 5 (1, 63) 5
*
*
DeKalb County Urban *** 13.1 (10.2, 16.7) 22 (3, 61) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.7)
Douglas County Rural *** 12.9 (7.6, 20.9) 24 (1, 66) 4
*
*
DuPage County Urban *** 10.5 (9.7, 11.4) 57 (33, 60) 122 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Edgar County Rural *** 10.6 (6.0, 18.3) 54 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Effingham County Rural *** 11.6 (7.7, 17.0) 35 (2, 66) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 2.0)
Fayette County Rural *** 10.6 (6.0, 17.8) 52 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Ford County Urban *** 18.2 (10.3, 30.4) 2 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Franklin County Rural *** 12.1 (8.5, 17.1) 29 (2, 66) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.5)
Fulton County Rural *** 16.9 (12.1, 23.3) 4 (1, 56) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.3)
Grundy County Urban *** 13.8 (9.8, 18.8) 17 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.4)
Henry County Urban *** 11.6 (8.3, 16.0) 36 (4, 66) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.6)
Iroquois County Rural *** 14.1 (9.7, 20.3) 13 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 3.1)
Jackson County Rural *** 7.5 (4.7, 11.4) 66 (24, 66) 5
*
*
Jefferson County Rural *** 13.5 (9.3, 19.1) 21 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Jersey County Urban *** 18.5 (12.2, 27.2) 1 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Jo Daviess County Rural *** 11.5 (7.6, 17.8) 39 (2, 66) 6
*
*
Kane County Urban *** 11.4 (10.2, 12.8) 41 (18, 57) 68 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 6.0)
Kankakee County Urban *** 11.7 (9.3, 14.6) 34 (8, 63) 17 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 3.4)
Kendall County Urban *** 11.5 (8.9, 14.7) 38 (7, 64) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.6)
Knox County Rural *** 14.0 (10.4, 18.6) 16 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
La Salle County Rural *** 14.0 (11.4, 17.0) 15 (2, 54) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 2.1)
Lake County Urban *** 11.8 (10.8, 12.9) 32 (17, 53) 98 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.9)
Lawrence County Rural *** 16.5 (9.7, 26.9) 6 (1, 66) 4 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.4)
Lee County Rural *** 14.1 (9.7, 19.9) 14 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 2.0)
Livingston County Rural *** 15.0 (10.5, 21.0) 9 (1, 61) 8 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 4.1)
Logan County Rural *** 14.7 (9.8, 21.4) 11 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 3.1)
Macon County Urban *** 10.5 (8.3, 13.2) 56 (13, 65) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Macoupin County Urban *** 10.7 (7.4, 15.2) 50 (6, 66) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.0)
Madison County Urban *** 12.4 (10.8, 14.2) 26 (9, 55) 44 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Marion County Rural *** 12.6 (8.8, 17.7) 25 (2, 65) 7 stable stable trend 18.5 (-6.8, 38.9)
McHenry County Urban *** 11.6 (10.1, 13.3) 37 (13, 59) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 1.0)
McLean County Urban *** 11.2 (9.1, 13.6) 45 (11, 64) 21 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.0, 12.7)
Mercer County Urban *** 18.0 (11.2, 28.2) 3 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Monroe County Urban *** 8.7 (5.4, 13.6) 62 (11, 66) 4
*
*
Montgomery County Rural *** 9.8 (5.9, 15.7) 59 (5, 66) 4
*
*
Morgan County Rural *** 7.9 (4.7, 12.7) 65 (16, 66) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.7)
Ogle County Rural *** 9.4 (6.5, 13.3) 61 (11, 66) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Peoria County Urban *** 10.8 (9.0, 13.0) 49 (15, 63) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Perry County Rural *** 13.8 (8.1, 22.1) 18 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Piatt County Urban *** 14.5 (8.6, 23.5) 12 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Randolph County Rural *** 11.2 (7.3, 16.8) 44 (3, 66) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.3)
Richland County Rural *** 15.4 (8.6, 25.9) 7 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Rock Island County Urban *** 10.6 (8.7, 12.9) 51 (14, 64) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.8)
Saline County Rural *** 11.4 (7.0, 18.0) 42 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Sangamon County Urban *** 13.7 (11.8, 15.9) 19 (4, 48) 37 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.5)
Shelby County Rural *** 8.6 (4.9, 14.8) 63 (8, 66) 3
*
*
St. Clair County Urban *** 11.4 (9.8, 13.3) 40 (14, 61) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Stephenson County Rural *** 8.6 (5.8, 12.5) 64 (16, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
Tazewell County Urban *** 11.2 (9.1, 13.6) 46 (11, 63) 22 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.3)
Union County Rural *** 10.6 (6.0, 18.2) 53 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Vermilion County Rural *** 13.6 (10.6, 17.2) 20 (3, 60) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.6)
Whiteside County Rural *** 12.3 (9.3, 16.2) 27 (4, 63) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.9)
Will County Urban *** 13.0 (11.8, 14.2) 23 (10, 44) 98 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.3)
Williamson County Rural *** 11.4 (8.6, 15.0) 43 (6, 65) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Winnebago County Urban *** 12.2 (10.7, 13.9) 28 (11, 55) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Woodford County Urban *** 9.8 (6.5, 14.5) 58 (8, 66) 6
*
*
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bond County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Witt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDonough County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moultrie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top