Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

Leukemia, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A *** 6.0 (5.8, 6.2) N/A 918 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -1.7)
United States N/A *** 5.9 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,472 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Adams County Rural *** 5.7 (3.8, 8.3) 32 (3, 40) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Boone County Urban *** 6.3 (3.8, 9.9) 23 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Bureau County Rural *** 7.1 (4.1, 11.8) 9 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Champaign County Urban *** 4.7 (3.5, 6.3) 38 (13, 40) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
Christian County Rural *** 6.1 (3.5, 10.4) 25 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Cook County Urban *** 5.6 (5.3, 5.9) 33 (20, 36) 336 falling falling trend -2.8 (-6.9, -1.4)
DeKalb County Urban *** 6.7 (4.6, 9.4) 17 (2, 40) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.6)
DuPage County Urban *** 5.9 (5.3, 6.6) 30 (13, 36) 66 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Fulton County Rural *** 6.3 (3.5, 10.8) 22 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Grundy County Urban *** 7.0 (4.2, 11.0) 11 (1, 40) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
Henry County Urban *** 6.7 (4.3, 10.1) 18 (2, 40) 5
*
*
Iroquois County Rural *** 8.0 (4.4, 13.7) 4 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 4.9 (2.8, 8.1) 37 (4, 40) 3 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -1.4)
Jefferson County Rural *** 5.9 (3.4, 9.9) 29 (2, 40) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Kane County Urban *** 5.7 (4.9, 6.7) 31 (11, 38) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.2)
Kankakee County Urban *** 7.0 (5.1, 9.4) 10 (2, 39) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.5)
Kendall County Urban *** 4.7 (3.1, 6.9) 39 (8, 40) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 1.8)
Knox County Rural *** 8.3 (5.5, 12.2) 3 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
La Salle County Rural *** 6.6 (4.9, 8.7) 20 (2, 39) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.8)
Lake County Urban *** 6.1 (5.3, 6.9) 27 (9, 36) 47 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -1.5)
Macon County Urban *** 6.5 (4.8, 8.7) 21 (2, 39) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Macoupin County Urban *** 6.9 (4.3, 10.7) 13 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Madison County Urban *** 6.8 (5.6, 8.2) 15 (3, 35) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Marion County Rural *** 8.7 (5.5, 13.2) 2 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
McHenry County Urban *** 6.7 (5.5, 8.1) 16 (4, 35) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-13.2, -0.5)
McLean County Urban *** 5.6 (4.1, 7.4) 34 (6, 40) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Montgomery County Rural *** 12.7 (8.0, 19.3) 1 (1, 26) 5
*
*
Morgan County Rural *** 7.6 (4.4, 12.5) 6 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Ogle County Rural *** 7.3 (4.8, 10.9) 7 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Peoria County Urban *** 6.2 (4.8, 7.8) 24 (5, 39) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Randolph County Rural *** 7.3 (4.3, 12.0) 8 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Rock Island County Urban *** 5.1 (3.8, 6.8) 35 (10, 40) 10 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Sangamon County Urban *** 6.0 (4.7, 7.5) 28 (6, 39) 16 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
St. Clair County Urban *** 6.1 (4.9, 7.5) 26 (6, 39) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Tazewell County Urban *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.1) 40 (17, 40) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Vermilion County Rural *** 7.9 (5.5, 10.9) 5 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Whiteside County Rural *** 5.0 (3.1, 7.7) 36 (5, 40) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Will County Urban *** 6.9 (6.1, 7.9) 12 (5, 28) 50 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.7, 0.0)
Williamson County Rural *** 6.9 (4.7, 9.9) 14 (2, 40) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-19.2, -0.3)
Winnebago County Urban *** 6.6 (5.4, 8.0) 19 (4, 36) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Alexander County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bond County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coles County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Witt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgar County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Effingham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ford County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jersey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jo Daviess County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDonough County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moultrie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piatt County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saline County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephenson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodford County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 6:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top