Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana No 166.9 (165.7, 168.2) N/A 13,509 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.4, -1.3)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Scott County No 232.9 (208.5, 259.4) 1 (1, 14) 70 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Fountain County No 213.3 (188.1, 241.4) 2 (1, 51) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Blackford County No 209.3 (180.6, 242.0) 3 (1, 70) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Jennings County No 205.2 (183.9, 228.4) 4 (1, 58) 71 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Orange County No 204.8 (181.2, 231.0) 5 (1, 62) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Vermillion County No 202.2 (176.0, 231.6) 6 (1, 73) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Jefferson County No 202.0 (182.9, 222.7) 7 (1, 51) 86 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Pulaski County No 200.4 (171.9, 232.8) 8 (1, 79) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Henry County No 199.8 (184.7, 215.9) 9 (1, 41) 135 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Greene County No 191.2 (173.3, 210.6) 10 (2, 66) 88 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Pike County No 190.9 (163.0, 222.8) 11 (1, 87) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Starke County No 190.6 (169.5, 213.9) 12 (1, 78) 63 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Clay County No 190.1 (170.0, 212.1) 13 (2, 74) 68 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Owen County No 188.9 (166.6, 213.7) 14 (1, 82) 56 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Putnam County No 188.6 (171.3, 207.3) 15 (2, 71) 90 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Sullivan County No 188.2 (165.5, 213.5) 16 (1, 81) 51 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Grant County No 187.7 (175.2, 200.9) 17 (3, 55) 177 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Union County No 185.9 (149.9, 229.0) 18 (1, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Shelby County No 185.7 (170.2, 202.3) 19 (3, 69) 111 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Crawford County No 184.8 (154.7, 219.7) 20 (1, 90) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Howard County No 184.6 (173.5, 196.4) 21 (6, 56) 215 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Fulton County No 184.4 (162.3, 208.9) 22 (2, 85) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Clinton County No 184.1 (165.7, 204.1) 23 (2, 77) 77 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Huntington County No 181.5 (164.7, 199.7) 24 (3, 79) 89 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Washington County No 181.3 (161.6, 202.9) 25 (2, 81) 65 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Wabash County No 181.2 (163.6, 200.4) 26 (4, 79) 87 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Fayette County No 181.2 (160.9, 203.6) 27 (3, 84) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Noble County No 180.6 (165.0, 197.4) 28 (4, 76) 104 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Vigo County No 179.0 (168.8, 189.7) 29 (10, 68) 238 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Jackson County No 176.9 (161.4, 193.5) 30 (6, 79) 99 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.9, -0.7)
Delaware County No 176.5 (166.8, 186.7) 31 (12, 69) 257 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
DeKalb County No 175.4 (159.6, 192.4) 32 (6, 82) 95 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Franklin County No 175.2 (154.5, 198.3) 33 (4, 88) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
White County No 175.0 (155.6, 196.5) 34 (5, 87) 63 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Miami County No 174.7 (158.0, 192.9) 35 (6, 85) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Knox County No 173.8 (157.5, 191.5) 36 (7, 87) 87 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Harrison County No 173.6 (157.8, 190.8) 37 (7, 84) 93 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Cass County No 173.2 (157.3, 190.4) 38 (7, 86) 90 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
LaPorte County No 173.1 (163.5, 183.2) 39 (16, 74) 255 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Madison County No 172.9 (164.1, 182.1) 40 (17, 73) 301 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Wayne County No 172.9 (160.9, 185.6) 41 (11, 79) 163 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Marion County No 172.1 (168.4, 176.0) 42 (28, 61) 1,669 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Perry County No 172.0 (150.2, 196.5) 43 (4, 90) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Lawrence County No 171.8 (157.8, 186.8) 44 (11, 84) 116 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Decatur County No 171.7 (152.2, 193.2) 45 (5, 89) 58 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Vanderburgh County No 171.6 (164.1, 179.5) 46 (20, 71) 406 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Clark County No 171.6 (161.9, 181.8) 47 (16, 77) 244 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Martin County No 171.2 (142.1, 205.4) 48 (2, 92) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Randolph County No 171.0 (152.5, 191.5) 49 (7, 89) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Rush County No 170.2 (146.8, 196.6) 50 (4, 91) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Switzerland County No 169.8 (140.4, 204.2) 51 (2, 92) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Whitley County No 169.6 (153.0, 187.7) 52 (8, 88) 80 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
LaGrange County No 169.3 (151.5, 188.5) 53 (9, 89) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Wells County No 169.2 (151.0, 189.2) 54 (7, 88) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Adams County No 169.2 (151.5, 188.4) 55 (8, 89) 70 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Morgan County No 169.1 (157.0, 182.0) 56 (15, 84) 152 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Tipton County No 167.7 (143.9, 194.9) 57 (5, 91) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Jay County No 167.7 (146.3, 191.6) 58 (7, 91) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Ripley County No 167.6 (149.5, 187.5) 59 (9, 89) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lake County No 167.5 (162.9, 172.3) 60 (35, 71) 1,039 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Floyd County No 167.0 (155.4, 179.3) 61 (18, 84) 162 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
St. Joseph County No 166.8 (160.5, 173.4) 62 (32, 75) 548 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Dearborn County No 166.8 (152.8, 181.8) 63 (13, 86) 111 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Ohio County No 164.2 (130.4, 206.3) 64 (2, 92) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Newton County No 164.1 (140.0, 191.6) 65 (5, 92) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Boone County No 163.3 (150.0, 177.6) 66 (20, 88) 114 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Parke County No 163.1 (140.4, 188.8) 67 (6, 92) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Daviess County No 163.1 (145.4, 182.4) 68 (12, 91) 64 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Allen County No 163.1 (157.6, 168.7) 69 (42, 81) 692 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Porter County No 163.0 (155.2, 171.1) 70 (36, 83) 344 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Johnson County No 162.8 (154.3, 171.6) 71 (32, 84) 284 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Brown County No 161.3 (138.5, 187.5) 72 (7, 92) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Gibson County No 160.6 (144.1, 178.6) 73 (17, 90) 72 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Posey County No 159.5 (140.8, 180.1) 74 (12, 91) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Elkhart County No 157.4 (150.2, 164.9) 75 (49, 87) 367 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Benton County No 156.1 (125.4, 192.6) 76 (4, 92) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Montgomery County No 154.7 (139.9, 170.7) 77 (30, 91) 83 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Hendricks County No 154.5 (146.2, 163.1) 78 (50, 89) 273 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Steuben County No 154.4 (138.8, 171.4) 79 (26, 91) 77 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Spencer County No 154.2 (134.2, 176.6) 80 (16, 92) 46 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Hancock County No 154.1 (143.0, 166.0) 81 (41, 90) 147 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Jasper County No 153.9 (137.7, 171.7) 82 (23, 91) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Marshall County No 153.8 (140.0, 168.6) 83 (35, 91) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Warrick County No 151.4 (139.5, 164.1) 84 (47, 91) 125 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Kosciusko County No 151.2 (140.4, 162.8) 85 (50, 91) 150 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Bartholomew County No 149.0 (138.4, 160.1) 86 (56, 91) 152 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Dubois County No 148.1 (134.1, 163.3) 87 (44, 92) 85 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Tippecanoe County No 146.9 (138.8, 155.3) 88 (67, 91) 255 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Carroll County No 139.0 (120.1, 160.3) 89 (42, 92) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Monroe County No 137.8 (129.3, 146.8) 90 (78, 92) 202 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.4, -1.2)
Warren County No 134.2 (107.1, 167.2) 91 (23, 92) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Hamilton County No 126.8 (121.2, 132.6) 92 (88, 92) 403 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2022 4:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top