Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A Yes 16.2 (15.7, 16.8) N/A 659 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States N/A Yes 14.4 (14.4, 14.5) N/A 29,194 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Fayette County Rural Yes 32.2 (20.1, 48.8) 1 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 2.7)
Owen County Urban Yes 29.0 (17.2, 46.1) 2 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Fulton County Rural Yes 28.9 (16.8, 46.2) 3 (1, 49) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.1)
Harrison County Urban Yes 26.9 (18.4, 38.0) 4 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.3)
Greene County Rural Yes 25.2 (15.9, 37.9) 5 (1, 48) 5
*
*
Washington County Urban Yes 25.1 (15.5, 38.3) 6 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Henry County Rural Yes 24.9 (17.5, 34.4) 7 (1, 40) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Franklin County Urban Yes 24.5 (14.0, 39.8) 8 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Grant County Rural Yes 23.4 (16.9, 31.6) 9 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.3)
Wabash County Rural Yes 21.6 (12.8, 34.1) 10 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Lawrence County Rural Yes 21.1 (14.1, 30.4) 11 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Howard County Urban Yes 20.4 (15.0, 27.1) 12 (3, 45) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Noble County Rural Yes 20.4 (13.6, 29.3) 13 (2, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Montgomery County Rural Yes 20.0 (12.5, 30.2) 14 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Ripley County Rural Yes 19.6 (11.4, 31.4) 15 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Adams County Rural Yes 19.6 (11.6, 30.7) 16 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Vanderburgh County Urban Yes 19.5 (15.9, 23.8) 17 (5, 39) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Miami County Rural Yes 19.5 (12.2, 29.6) 18 (2, 50) 4
*
*
Wayne County Rural Yes 19.4 (13.6, 26.7) 19 (3, 48) 7 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.3)
Madison County Urban Yes 19.3 (15.2, 24.2) 20 (5, 43) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Dearborn County Urban Yes 18.9 (12.5, 27.3) 21 (3, 50) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Cass County Rural Yes 18.6 (11.5, 28.4) 22 (2, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.3)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 18.5 (11.0, 29.3) 23 (2, 50) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.1, 14.7)
Delaware County Urban Yes 18.2 (13.6, 23.9) 24 (5, 48) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Marion County Urban Yes 17.7 (16.2, 19.3) 25 (14, 35) 105 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Marshall County Rural Yes 17.5 (11.1, 26.3) 26 (3, 50) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Floyd County Urban Yes 17.4 (12.6, 23.4) 27 (5, 49) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.5)
Kosciusko County Rural Yes 17.3 (12.4, 23.6) 28 (5, 49) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Steuben County Rural Yes 17.1 (9.7, 27.8) 29 (2, 50) 3
*
*
LaPorte County Urban Yes 16.8 (12.7, 21.8) 30 (7, 49) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Allen County Urban Yes 16.3 (14.1, 18.8) 31 (15, 44) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Vigo County Urban Yes 16.2 (11.9, 21.6) 32 (8, 49) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Johnson County Urban Yes 15.7 (12.5, 19.5) 33 (12, 48) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Clark County Urban Yes 15.4 (11.7, 19.8) 34 (11, 50) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -2.0)
Bartholomew County Urban Yes 15.3 (10.9, 20.9) 35 (9, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Monroe County Urban Yes 15.3 (11.4, 19.9) 36 (11, 50) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.7)
DeKalb County Rural Yes 15.1 (9.1, 23.5) 37 (6, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Lake County Urban Yes 15.0 (13.1, 17.1) 38 (20, 46) 45 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
St. Joseph County Urban Yes 15.0 (12.4, 18.0) 39 (17, 48) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Elkhart County Urban Yes 14.6 (11.7, 17.9) 40 (16, 49) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.3)
Hancock County Urban Yes 14.2 (9.9, 19.7) 41 (10, 50) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Porter County Urban Yes 13.7 (10.7, 17.2) 42 (19, 50) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-15.8, -1.3)
Boone County Urban Yes 13.5 (9.2, 19.1) 43 (12, 50) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Tippecanoe County Urban Yes 13.2 (10.1, 16.9) 44 (20, 50) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Warrick County Urban Yes 12.7 (8.2, 18.8) 45 (14, 50) 5 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.2)
Dubois County Rural Yes 12.7 (7.2, 20.5) 46 (9, 50) 3
*
*
Morgan County Urban Yes 11.8 (7.7, 17.3) 47 (17, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Jackson County Rural Yes 11.5 (6.6, 18.6) 48 (13, 50) 3
*
*
Hamilton County Urban Yes 11.4 (9.5, 13.4) 49 (36, 50) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.6)
Hendricks County Urban Yes 11.3 (8.7, 14.3) 50 (31, 50) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gibson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huntington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jennings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaGrange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Whitley County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/14/2025 10:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top