Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana No 560.8 (556.4, 565.2) N/A 12,843 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.4, -1.3)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Scott County No 776.3 (693.3, 866.5) 1 (1, 17) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Fountain County No 734.4 (647.4, 829.9) 2 (1, 37) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Blackford County No 711.0 (612.6, 820.9) 3 (1, 62) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Orange County No 687.1 (607.5, 774.2) 4 (1, 60) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Jennings County No 685.5 (612.7, 764.4) 5 (1, 52) 67 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Pulaski County No 672.0 (576.4, 779.1) 6 (1, 78) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Jefferson County No 671.3 (606.7, 740.9) 7 (1, 51) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Starke County No 666.7 (592.5, 747.7) 8 (1, 63) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Vermillion County No 662.1 (575.5, 758.3) 9 (1, 78) 43 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Henry County No 655.4 (605.2, 708.7) 10 (2, 48) 128 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Clay County No 644.2 (575.2, 719.1) 11 (1, 74) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Putnam County No 640.5 (581.1, 704.4) 12 (2, 65) 86 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Union County No 636.3 (512.2, 781.5) 13 (1, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Shelby County No 629.3 (576.2, 686.0) 14 (3, 65) 106 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Pike County No 627.7 (535.0, 732.0) 15 (1, 87) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Clinton County No 624.9 (561.7, 693.4) 16 (2, 74) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Grant County No 620.7 (579.1, 664.6) 17 (5, 62) 169 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Crawford County No 619.8 (517.8, 736.0) 18 (1, 90) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Huntington County No 619.3 (561.4, 681.5) 19 (3, 74) 86 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Sullivan County No 618.4 (541.8, 702.7) 20 (2, 85) 48 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Greene County No 617.5 (559.0, 680.5) 21 (3, 75) 83 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Fulton County No 616.8 (542.4, 698.7) 22 (2, 86) 51 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Owen County No 612.2 (538.5, 693.1) 23 (2, 85) 52 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Vigo County No 606.1 (571.1, 642.7) 24 (7, 63) 229 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Howard County No 605.0 (568.1, 643.6) 25 (8, 64) 204 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Perry County No 604.3 (527.2, 689.4) 26 (2, 89) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Jackson County No 599.7 (546.3, 656.9) 27 (5, 78) 94 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.5, -0.2)
Fayette County No 596.8 (529.0, 670.9) 28 (3, 87) 58 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Ohio County No 594.3 (472.0, 739.0) 29 (1, 92) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Delaware County No 594.3 (561.3, 628.7) 30 (11, 67) 247 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
DeKalb County No 594.3 (540.0, 652.5) 31 (6, 82) 91 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Noble County No 593.3 (540.4, 649.8) 32 (6, 82) 98 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Martin County No 592.0 (490.8, 707.8) 33 (1, 92) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Whitley County No 590.6 (532.4, 653.4) 34 (5, 84) 78 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
White County No 586.1 (520.9, 657.3) 35 (5, 88) 60 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Miami County No 586.0 (528.7, 647.8) 36 (6, 84) 78 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Cass County No 585.5 (531.2, 644.0) 37 (6, 84) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Randolph County No 585.2 (521.8, 654.3) 38 (5, 87) 63 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Washington County No 584.0 (518.6, 655.4) 39 (5, 88) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Clark County No 584.0 (550.2, 619.3) 40 (13, 74) 233 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Knox County No 583.6 (528.4, 643.0) 41 (7, 84) 84 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
LaPorte County No 581.1 (548.5, 615.3) 42 (14, 73) 244 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Wayne County No 580.1 (539.6, 622.8) 43 (11, 78) 156 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Lawrence County No 578.4 (530.8, 629.0) 44 (11, 84) 111 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Decatur County No 577.7 (511.0, 650.6) 45 (5, 89) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Marion County No 576.8 (563.8, 590.1) 46 (27, 61) 1,565 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Wells County No 574.2 (512.1, 641.8) 47 (6, 89) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Wabash County No 573.6 (518.0, 633.7) 48 (9, 88) 81 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Vanderburgh County No 571.5 (545.9, 598.0) 49 (23, 73) 387 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Harrison County No 570.6 (517.3, 627.8) 50 (9, 88) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Morgan County No 569.7 (528.1, 613.7) 51 (13, 83) 145 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
LaGrange County No 569.0 (508.2, 635.1) 52 (7, 89) 65 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Madison County No 568.6 (539.1, 599.3) 53 (21, 77) 284 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Franklin County No 566.1 (497.9, 641.1) 54 (6, 91) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Lake County No 563.9 (548.0, 580.0) 55 (33, 71) 991 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
St. Joseph County No 563.1 (541.3, 585.6) 56 (30, 75) 523 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Dearborn County No 562.3 (514.6, 613.2) 57 (13, 88) 106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Newton County No 561.0 (478.5, 653.7) 58 (4, 91) 34 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Ripley County No 560.6 (499.2, 627.5) 59 (7, 90) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Adams County No 558.1 (498.8, 622.5) 60 (11, 90) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Jay County No 556.0 (483.9, 635.9) 61 (7, 91) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Floyd County No 554.8 (515.4, 596.5) 62 (20, 87) 153 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Boone County No 554.5 (508.0, 604.2) 63 (15, 88) 108 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Rush County No 552.8 (475.6, 639.0) 64 (5, 92) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Switzerland County No 549.6 (452.1, 661.8) 65 (3, 92) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Johnson County No 548.7 (519.4, 579.1) 66 (26, 84) 268 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Allen County No 548.0 (529.0, 567.4) 67 (41, 80) 655 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Porter County No 545.7 (519.0, 573.4) 68 (33, 84) 326 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Benton County No 544.2 (436.8, 669.9) 69 (3, 92) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Daviess County No 543.9 (484.2, 609.0) 70 (13, 91) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Gibson County No 540.7 (484.4, 601.8) 71 (14, 91) 69 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Brown County No 535.9 (460.9, 619.6) 72 (10, 92) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Parke County No 533.3 (457.9, 617.6) 73 (7, 92) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Montgomery County No 531.5 (480.4, 586.5) 74 (23, 91) 80 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Tipton County No 529.5 (453.7, 614.4) 75 (8, 92) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Elkhart County No 526.6 (501.8, 552.3) 76 (49, 87) 347 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Hendricks County No 525.2 (496.4, 555.1) 77 (45, 89) 259 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Hancock County No 519.7 (481.3, 560.3) 78 (38, 91) 140 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Marshall County No 518.6 (471.6, 568.9) 79 (31, 91) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Posey County No 516.7 (455.3, 583.9) 80 (18, 92) 53 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Warrick County No 511.7 (470.8, 555.1) 81 (41, 91) 119 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Spencer County No 510.6 (444.3, 584.0) 82 (18, 92) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Kosciusko County No 507.1 (470.1, 546.2) 83 (45, 91) 143 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Jasper County No 506.7 (452.5, 565.8) 84 (30, 92) 65 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Bartholomew County No 505.7 (469.3, 544.2) 85 (50, 91) 146 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Steuben County No 502.7 (451.6, 558.0) 86 (30, 92) 73 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Dubois County No 502.1 (454.0, 554.0) 87 (37, 92) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Tippecanoe County No 496.6 (468.5, 525.9) 88 (65, 91) 241 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Warren County No 476.0 (379.7, 589.4) 89 (13, 92) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Carroll County No 471.7 (407.3, 543.3) 90 (38, 92) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Monroe County No 469.1 (439.5, 500.2) 91 (76, 92) 193 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Hamilton County No 431.7 (412.0, 452.0) 92 (88, 92) 379 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 7:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top