Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A No 141.7 (140.2, 143.3) N/A 6,448 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Warren County Urban Yes 97.7 (66.6, 141.1) 92 (19, 92) 7 falling falling trend -10.1 (-27.0, -1.9)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 109.5 (102.9, 116.3) 91 (82, 92) 213 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Brown County Urban Yes 120.0 (93.5, 153.3) 90 (10, 92) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.0, -1.0)
Monroe County Urban Yes 121.8 (111.0, 133.5) 89 (52, 92) 99 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Dubois County Rural Yes 121.9 (104.8, 141.3) 88 (32, 92) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Posey County Urban No 123.8 (101.8, 149.8) 87 (16, 92) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Ripley County Rural No 124.2 (103.6, 148.3) 86 (17, 92) 27 falling falling trend -2.9 (-11.2, -1.2)
Marshall County Rural No 125.5 (108.4, 144.9) 85 (23, 92) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Hendricks County Urban No 125.6 (116.2, 135.7) 84 (51, 91) 133 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Warrick County Urban No 126.9 (112.7, 142.7) 83 (30, 92) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Tippecanoe County Urban No 127.8 (117.6, 138.7) 82 (45, 90) 120 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Hancock County Urban No 127.8 (114.7, 142.2) 81 (31, 91) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Crawford County Rural No 128.3 (95.6, 170.9) 80 (3, 92) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Benton County Urban No 129.7 (93.3, 177.6) 79 (2, 92) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Carroll County Urban No 129.9 (105.0, 159.7) 78 (7, 92) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Spencer County Rural No 130.4 (103.8, 162.4) 77 (8, 92) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Steuben County Rural No 132.4 (112.5, 155.4) 76 (13, 92) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.4)
Adams County Rural No 132.6 (112.0, 156.0) 75 (13, 92) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Elkhart County Urban No 132.7 (123.9, 142.1) 74 (37, 87) 175 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 132.8 (113.6, 154.7) 73 (14, 92) 37 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Union County Rural No 133.2 (93.8, 186.8) 72 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Jackson County Rural No 133.6 (116.2, 153.2) 71 (17, 91) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Gibson County Rural No 133.9 (113.2, 157.6) 70 (9, 92) 31 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Parke County Rural No 134.0 (105.6, 168.6) 69 (5, 92) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Huntington County Rural No 134.2 (115.4, 155.6) 68 (12, 92) 38 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Allen County Urban No 135.0 (128.4, 141.9) 67 (42, 83) 331 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Franklin County Urban No 135.1 (110.6, 164.1) 66 (8, 92) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Daviess County Rural No 135.9 (113.9, 161.2) 65 (6, 92) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Lake County Urban No 136.8 (131.3, 142.5) 64 (41, 78) 489 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -1.5)
Washington County Urban No 137.2 (114.1, 164.1) 63 (6, 92) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Cass County Rural No 137.7 (118.5, 159.5) 62 (10, 91) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
LaPorte County Urban No 137.9 (126.4, 150.3) 61 (21, 87) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Harrison County Urban No 138.8 (119.4, 160.7) 60 (9, 91) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Newton County Urban No 138.8 (108.9, 175.9) 59 (2, 92) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-13.5, -0.8)
Johnson County Urban No 139.1 (129.0, 149.8) 58 (23, 85) 145 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Jasper County Urban No 139.2 (118.5, 162.8) 57 (10, 91) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Sullivan County Urban No 140.6 (114.1, 172.3) 56 (3, 92) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.5)
Jefferson County Rural No 140.8 (120.4, 164.2) 55 (7, 91) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.4, 0.0)
LaGrange County Rural No 141.2 (119.3, 166.1) 54 (4, 91) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.7)
Floyd County Urban No 142.1 (128.2, 157.2) 53 (13, 86) 81 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Kosciusko County Rural No 142.1 (128.0, 157.5) 52 (13, 85) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Porter County Urban No 142.2 (132.7, 152.3) 51 (23, 80) 174 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Boone County Urban No 142.5 (126.7, 159.9) 50 (12, 87) 60 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Randolph County Rural No 142.6 (118.4, 170.9) 49 (3, 91) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Bartholomew County Urban No 143.1 (129.2, 158.3) 48 (14, 84) 80 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Wells County Urban No 143.4 (120.0, 170.3) 47 (4, 91) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Martin County Rural No 143.7 (106.2, 191.8) 46 (1, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Dearborn County Urban No 144.1 (126.4, 163.8) 45 (8, 88) 51 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Perry County Rural No 144.6 (116.5, 178.5) 44 (2, 92) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
White County Rural No 145.0 (121.2, 172.8) 43 (3, 91) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Switzerland County Rural No 145.7 (107.2, 195.2) 42 (1, 92) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.7)
Decatur County Rural No 145.8 (121.9, 173.6) 41 (3, 90) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
St. Joseph County Urban No 146.0 (138.1, 154.3) 40 (19, 69) 269 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Vanderburgh County Urban No 147.5 (138.0, 157.6) 39 (16, 70) 194 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Marion County Urban No 147.6 (143.0, 152.3) 38 (25, 59) 822 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.1)
Madison County Urban No 147.8 (136.7, 159.6) 37 (13, 76) 142 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Noble County Rural No 148.0 (128.9, 169.2) 36 (5, 87) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Clinton County Rural No 148.3 (126.3, 173.3) 35 (3, 89) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Shelby County Urban No 148.3 (130.0, 168.7) 34 (5, 86) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Fulton County Rural No 148.6 (122.5, 179.5) 33 (2, 91) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Clay County Urban No 148.9 (125.2, 176.2) 32 (3, 90) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Delaware County Urban No 149.8 (137.5, 163.1) 31 (11, 74) 117 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.8)
Ohio County Urban No 150.9 (107.4, 211.1) 30 (1, 92) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 1.0)
Clark County Urban No 151.0 (139.2, 163.6) 29 (10, 72) 126 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Vigo County Urban No 153.7 (140.7, 167.6) 28 (7, 70) 113 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Wabash County Rural No 155.9 (134.1, 180.7) 27 (2, 84) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Putnam County Rural No 156.2 (134.6, 180.6) 26 (2, 85) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
DeKalb County Rural No 156.2 (136.3, 178.4) 25 (3, 80) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Howard County Urban No 158.8 (144.8, 173.8) 24 (4, 66) 103 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Greene County Rural No 158.9 (136.1, 184.8) 23 (1, 83) 37 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Fountain County Rural No 158.9 (129.4, 194.3) 22 (1, 90) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Blackford County Rural No 159.0 (126.5, 199.2) 21 (1, 90) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Morgan County Urban No 159.2 (143.7, 176.1) 20 (3, 66) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.2)
Pulaski County Rural No 160.3 (124.2, 204.8) 19 (1, 91) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Miami County Rural No 160.7 (137.9, 186.7) 18 (1, 80) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Lawrence County Rural No 161.2 (142.2, 182.3) 17 (2, 72) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Wayne County Rural No 161.5 (145.6, 178.9) 16 (2, 66) 82 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Knox County Rural No 162.2 (140.8, 186.4) 15 (1, 73) 44 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Grant County Rural No 162.4 (146.6, 179.6) 14 (3, 66) 84 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Henry County Rural No 164.8 (145.9, 185.7) 13 (1, 68) 60 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Rush County Rural No 169.1 (137.2, 207.1) 12 (1, 85) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Starke County Rural No 169.9 (142.5, 201.6) 11 (1, 76) 29 falling falling trend -2.7 (-13.8, -0.6)
Vermillion County Urban No 171.2 (137.5, 211.6) 10 (1, 86) 20 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Jay County Rural No 171.5 (142.3, 205.6) 9 (1, 82) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Tipton County Urban No 174.5 (142.0, 213.3) 8 (1, 85) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Whitley County Urban No 175.1 (152.1, 200.9) 7 (1, 63) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Owen County Urban No 175.5 (146.0, 209.9) 6 (1, 79) 27 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.1, 14.4)
Fayette County Rural No 179.5 (151.3, 212.0) 5 (1, 65) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Pike County Rural No 180.9 (142.9, 227.3) 4 (1, 84) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.7)
Jennings County Rural No 182.0 (154.6, 213.2) 3 (1, 61) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.6)
Scott County Rural No 183.0 (154.5, 215.7) 2 (1, 63) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.9)
Orange County Rural No 191.1 (159.5, 227.9) 1 (1, 61) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 7:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top