Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana No 142.2 (140.6, 143.8) N/A 6,340 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Marion County No 147.1 (142.5, 151.8) 42 (22, 59) 811 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Lake County No 145.7 (140.0, 151.7) 48 (21, 67) 506 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Allen County No 138.0 (131.3, 145.1) 64 (34, 78) 326 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
St. Joseph County No 146.4 (138.4, 154.7) 45 (17, 71) 270 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Hamilton County Yes 110.8 (103.9, 118.1) 88 (80, 92) 196 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Vanderburgh County No 146.5 (137.0, 156.6) 44 (13, 73) 193 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Elkhart County No 138.7 (129.6, 148.4) 63 (24, 80) 179 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Porter County No 144.4 (134.5, 154.9) 51 (15, 76) 167 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Madison County No 150.8 (139.5, 162.9) 33 (8, 72) 142 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Johnson County No 140.1 (129.6, 151.2) 58 (20, 82) 136 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Hendricks County No 129.8 (119.8, 140.5) 78 (40, 88) 128 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Tippecanoe County No 126.1 (116.0, 136.8) 81 (48, 89) 122 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Delaware County No 149.2 (137.1, 162.1) 38 (8, 76) 121 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Clark County No 146.0 (134.2, 158.7) 46 (11, 78) 117 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
LaPorte County No 143.3 (131.4, 156.1) 55 (12, 79) 115 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Vigo County No 151.5 (138.8, 165.1) 31 (7, 74) 114 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Howard County No 156.9 (142.9, 172.0) 17 (4, 69) 100 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Monroe County Yes 116.1 (105.7, 127.4) 87 (65, 92) 95 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Grant County No 150.3 (135.3, 166.7) 35 (5, 78) 79 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Wayne County No 147.9 (132.8, 164.5) 39 (7, 79) 76 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Bartholomew County No 133.8 (120.4, 148.4) 73 (22, 88) 76 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Floyd County No 139.5 (125.4, 154.9) 60 (14, 87) 75 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Morgan County No 154.5 (138.8, 171.6) 24 (4, 75) 74 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Kosciusko County No 133.9 (120.0, 149.1) 72 (20, 89) 71 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Hancock County No 125.4 (111.9, 140.2) 82 (31, 91) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Henry County No 176.8 (157.4, 198.3) 4 (1, 45) 65 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Warrick County No 133.0 (118.0, 149.5) 74 (21, 90) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Boone County No 150.5 (133.5, 169.2) 34 (4, 83) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Lawrence County No 145.2 (127.4, 165.0) 49 (6, 86) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Shelby County No 155.7 (136.6, 177.0) 20 (3, 79) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Dearborn County No 135.4 (118.4, 154.6) 68 (13, 90) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Noble County No 155.1 (135.3, 177.0) 23 (2, 80) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
DeKalb County No 153.1 (133.4, 175.2) 27 (3, 82) 45 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Marshall County No 126.6 (109.7, 145.6) 80 (23, 91) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Jackson County No 139.9 (121.3, 160.6) 59 (7, 89) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Knox County No 152.2 (131.6, 175.5) 29 (2, 85) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Harrison County No 141.6 (122.4, 163.3) 57 (6, 88) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Dubois County No 124.6 (107.3, 144.2) 84 (24, 92) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Cass County No 137.8 (118.6, 159.7) 65 (7, 90) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Huntington County No 142.8 (123.0, 165.3) 56 (5, 89) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Whitley County No 151.8 (130.6, 175.8) 30 (3, 85) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Wabash County No 147.0 (125.2, 172.0) 43 (4, 88) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Jefferson County No 161.2 (138.7, 186.8) 9 (1, 79) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Clinton County No 163.7 (140.3, 190.2) 8 (1, 75) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Putnam County No 150.3 (129.2, 174.4) 36 (3, 86) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Montgomery County No 123.0 (105.4, 143.1) 85 (26, 92) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Greene County No 149.6 (127.8, 174.6) 37 (3, 86) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Miami County No 139.0 (118.1, 163.0) 61 (6, 90) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Scott County No 206.5 (175.6, 241.6) 1 (1, 28) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Gibson County No 137.0 (116.1, 160.8) 67 (7, 91) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Jasper County No 135.3 (114.9, 158.8) 69 (7, 91) 33 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Steuben County No 124.7 (105.2, 147.1) 83 (21, 92) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Daviess County No 147.8 (124.9, 173.9) 40 (3, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Adams County No 134.0 (112.9, 158.1) 71 (6, 91) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
LaGrange County No 143.6 (121.3, 168.9) 54 (4, 90) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Jennings County No 164.3 (138.6, 193.7) 7 (1, 82) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Wells County No 144.4 (121.0, 171.5) 50 (3, 90) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Clay County No 151.2 (127.0, 179.1) 32 (2, 87) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Randolph County No 139.0 (116.1, 165.7) 62 (4, 91) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Washington County No 156.0 (130.7, 185.1) 19 (1, 86) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Fayette County No 155.5 (130.0, 185.2) 21 (2, 87) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Orange County No 195.0 (162.9, 232.3) 2 (1, 51) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Decatur County No 147.5 (123.5, 175.3) 41 (3, 90) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
White County No 143.7 (119.8, 171.6) 53 (3, 90) 28 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Ripley County No 130.1 (108.7, 154.9) 76 (10, 92) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Starke County No 161.1 (134.4, 192.1) 10 (1, 85) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Franklin County No 160.1 (133.0, 191.6) 12 (1, 85) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Fulton County No 158.8 (131.4, 191.1) 14 (1, 88) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Owen County No 160.8 (132.5, 194.0) 11 (1, 87) 24 stable stable trend 5.0 (-1.2, 11.5)
Jay County No 153.4 (126.3, 185.3) 26 (1, 88) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Sullivan County No 157.2 (128.6, 191.1) 16 (1, 88) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Perry County No 158.3 (129.2, 192.9) 15 (1, 88) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Vermillion County No 181.2 (147.0, 222.0) 3 (1, 79) 22 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Tipton County No 171.5 (139.0, 210.6) 6 (1, 84) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Fountain County No 155.4 (126.0, 190.6) 22 (1, 88) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Posey County Yes 108.1 (87.2, 132.9) 89 (36, 92) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Spencer County No 132.1 (106.1, 163.2) 75 (5, 92) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Rush County No 152.3 (122.7, 187.8) 28 (1, 90) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Brown County No 137.0 (107.5, 173.7) 66 (3, 92) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Pike County No 175.2 (138.2, 220.5) 5 (1, 86) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Blackford County No 153.5 (121.6, 193.2) 25 (1, 91) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Carroll County Yes 102.9 (81.2, 129.6) 91 (51, 92) 16 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.0, -1.2)
Pulaski County No 159.2 (124.4, 202.2) 13 (1, 90) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Parke County Yes 122.1 (95.4, 154.7) 86 (6, 92) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Newton County No 134.3 (104.6, 171.2) 70 (2, 92) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Martin County No 143.9 (107.5, 190.5) 52 (1, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Crawford County No 129.9 (97.1, 172.3) 77 (3, 92) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Switzerland County No 145.8 (109.1, 192.4) 47 (1, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Union County No 156.6 (113.8, 213.2) 18 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Warren County Yes 107.5 (74.7, 152.6) 90 (7, 92) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Benton County Yes 101.8 (70.1, 145.2) 92 (11, 92) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Ohio County No 128.8 (88.6, 186.1) 79 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/27/2024 12:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top