Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana *** 55.1 (54.3, 55.9) N/A 4,009 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States *** 48.4 (48.3, 48.5) N/A 171,025 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Marion County *** 58.4 (56.2, 60.6) 46 (28, 57) 570 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Lake County *** 54.9 (52.1, 57.9) 58 (34, 71) 306 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -1.9)
Allen County *** 54.1 (50.8, 57.5) 61 (35, 75) 214 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
St. Joseph County *** 56.0 (52.0, 60.2) 52 (27, 72) 161 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Vanderburgh County *** 58.7 (53.8, 63.9) 42 (19, 68) 121 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Hamilton County *** 31.9 (29.2, 34.7) 91 (88, 92) 107 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -2.0)
Elkhart County *** 49.9 (45.5, 54.5) 72 (44, 86) 103 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Porter County *** 50.4 (45.9, 55.3) 69 (42, 85) 100 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Madison County *** 66.4 (60.3, 73.0) 19 (5, 49) 94 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Johnson County *** 50.1 (45.2, 55.4) 70 (41, 87) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Tippecanoe County *** 48.1 (43.3, 53.3) 76 (47, 88) 76 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Hendricks County *** 43.3 (39.0, 48.0) 86 (65, 90) 76 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
LaPorte County *** 58.1 (52.1, 64.7) 47 (15, 76) 75 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Vigo County *** 66.4 (59.5, 73.9) 20 (4, 52) 73 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Clark County *** 51.5 (46.1, 57.4) 68 (33, 86) 70 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Delaware County *** 60.7 (54.2, 67.9) 32 (10, 70) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Howard County *** 75.4 (67.1, 84.5) 6 (1, 33) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Monroe County *** 45.8 (40.6, 51.6) 83 (51, 90) 59 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Grant County *** 73.2 (64.2, 83.1) 7 (1, 41) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Wayne County *** 68.5 (60.0, 78.0) 12 (2, 55) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Floyd County *** 53.0 (46.3, 60.5) 65 (23, 86) 49 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Morgan County *** 55.2 (48.1, 63.0) 56 (17, 83) 48 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Kosciusko County *** 49.8 (43.1, 57.3) 73 (32, 89) 43 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Hancock County *** 49.0 (42.5, 56.4) 75 (35, 90) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Bartholomew County *** 46.2 (39.9, 53.3) 81 (45, 90) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Dearborn County *** 56.0 (47.6, 65.6) 53 (11, 85) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Henry County *** 62.1 (52.7, 72.9) 26 (4, 78) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Noble County *** 61.4 (52.0, 72.2) 29 (3, 79) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Warrick County *** 45.4 (38.4, 53.4) 84 (43, 91) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Lawrence County *** 59.0 (49.8, 69.5) 41 (7, 82) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Boone County *** 42.3 (35.7, 49.8) 89 (58, 91) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Shelby County *** 56.0 (47.1, 66.2) 54 (11, 87) 31 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Jackson County *** 60.7 (51.2, 71.7) 31 (4, 81) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Harrison County *** 62.0 (52.0, 73.5) 27 (4, 80) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
DeKalb County *** 59.1 (49.6, 70.1) 39 (6, 84) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Cass County *** 62.7 (52.1, 75.0) 25 (3, 79) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Knox County *** 67.6 (56.0, 80.9) 15 (1, 72) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Montgomery County *** 57.5 (47.7, 68.9) 48 (6, 86) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Greene County *** 67.9 (56.1, 81.8) 14 (1, 72) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Putnam County *** 61.1 (50.5, 73.3) 30 (4, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Jefferson County *** 65.5 (54.0, 79.1) 21 (2, 79) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Huntington County *** 56.1 (46.1, 67.9) 51 (8, 88) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Marshall County *** 46.2 (38.0, 55.8) 82 (34, 91) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Wabash County *** 72.7 (59.5, 88.2) 8 (1, 64) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Jennings County *** 75.8 (62.4, 91.6) 5 (1, 55) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Scott County *** 83.6 (68.6, 101.1) 1 (1, 42) 24 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Clinton County *** 63.9 (52.4, 77.4) 23 (2, 79) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Miami County *** 53.5 (43.7, 65.0) 64 (11, 89) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Steuben County *** 51.6 (41.9, 63.3) 67 (14, 90) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Washington County *** 69.3 (56.4, 84.5) 11 (1, 73) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Daviess County *** 61.9 (50.1, 75.6) 28 (1, 85) 21 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.2)
Jasper County *** 56.5 (45.7, 69.4) 50 (6, 88) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Adams County *** 60.2 (48.6, 73.8) 35 (3, 87) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Starke County *** 67.0 (54.1, 82.6) 18 (1, 80) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Wells County *** 58.4 (46.9, 72.2) 45 (4, 88) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
LaGrange County *** 54.9 (44.3, 67.3) 57 (9, 90) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Dubois County *** 39.1 (31.3, 48.4) 90 (52, 92) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Ripley County *** 58.5 (47.0, 72.3) 44 (4, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Orange County *** 80.2 (63.9, 99.8) 3 (1, 57) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Whitley County *** 42.6 (34.0, 53.1) 88 (38, 92) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Decatur County *** 59.9 (47.7, 74.4) 37 (2, 88) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Clay County *** 58.6 (46.5, 73.1) 43 (3, 89) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Fayette County *** 64.9 (51.5, 81.1) 22 (1, 84) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Gibson County *** 47.4 (37.5, 59.2) 77 (21, 91) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Sullivan County *** 72.0 (56.9, 90.3) 9 (1, 75) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Franklin County *** 59.7 (46.7, 75.5) 38 (2, 89) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
White County *** 54.5 (42.5, 69.3) 59 (5, 90) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Owen County *** 59.9 (46.6, 76.4) 36 (2, 89) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Posey County *** 53.8 (41.8, 68.5) 62 (6, 91) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Fulton County *** 67.0 (52.2, 85.1) 17 (1, 84) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Randolph County *** 46.4 (35.8, 59.7) 79 (20, 92) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Vermillion County *** 78.7 (60.5, 101.3) 4 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Fountain County *** 68.1 (52.2, 88.0) 13 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Pike County *** 80.6 (60.7, 105.7) 2 (1, 74) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Perry County *** 49.9 (37.5, 65.6) 71 (8, 92) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.6)
Spencer County *** 49.3 (36.6, 65.3) 74 (7, 92) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Brown County *** 57.3 (41.9, 77.5) 49 (1, 91) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Pulaski County *** 70.9 (52.3, 94.8) 10 (1, 87) 11 rising rising trend 14.8 (3.2, 27.7)
Carroll County *** 46.4 (34.1, 62.2) 80 (12, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Rush County *** 53.8 (39.5, 72.0) 63 (3, 91) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Jay County *** 47.2 (34.7, 63.0) 78 (10, 92) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Parke County *** 51.8 (38.2, 69.3) 66 (6, 92) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Newton County *** 54.3 (39.7, 73.4) 60 (3, 91) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Tipton County *** 59.1 (42.8, 80.0) 40 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Crawford County *** 67.3 (47.8, 93.1) 16 (1, 90) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Blackford County *** 60.6 (42.9, 83.9) 34 (1, 91) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Switzerland County *** 63.6 (44.5, 89.0) 24 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Benton County *** 55.9 (37.3, 81.9) 55 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
Martin County *** 45.2 (29.9, 67.0) 85 (7, 92) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Union County *** 60.6 (39.2, 91.5) 33 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Ohio County *** 42.8 (25.9, 71.1) 87 (6, 92) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.3)
Warren County *** 29.0 (16.3, 49.9) 92 (53, 92) 3 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.2, -1.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/12/2022 4:48 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top