Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indiana | No | 142.2 (140.6, 143.8) | N/A | 6,340 | falling | -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1) |
United States | No | 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) | N/A | 283,896 | falling | -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7) |
Benton County | Yes | 101.8 (70.1, 145.2) | 92 (11, 92) | 7 | stable | -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0) |
Ohio County | No | 128.8 (88.6, 186.1) | 79 (1, 92) | 7 | stable | -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5) |
Warren County | Yes | 107.5 (74.7, 152.6) | 90 (7, 92) | 7 | stable | -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4) |
Union County | No | 156.6 (113.8, 213.2) | 18 (1, 92) | 9 | stable | 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5) |
Crawford County | No | 129.9 (97.1, 172.3) | 77 (3, 92) | 11 | falling | -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5) |
Switzerland County | No | 145.8 (109.1, 192.4) | 47 (1, 92) | 11 | stable | -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3) |
Martin County | No | 143.9 (107.5, 190.5) | 52 (1, 92) | 11 | stable | -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2) |
Newton County | No | 134.3 (104.6, 171.2) | 70 (2, 92) | 15 | stable | -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0) |
Parke County | Yes | 122.1 (95.4, 154.7) | 86 (6, 92) | 15 | falling | -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4) |
Pulaski County | No | 159.2 (124.4, 202.2) | 13 (1, 90) | 15 | stable | -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1) |
Carroll County | Yes | 102.9 (81.2, 129.6) | 91 (51, 92) | 16 | falling | -5.2 (-9.0, -1.2) |
Blackford County | No | 153.5 (121.6, 193.2) | 25 (1, 91) | 17 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Pike County | No | 175.2 (138.2, 220.5) | 5 (1, 86) | 17 | stable | 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6) |
Brown County | No | 137.0 (107.5, 173.7) | 66 (3, 92) | 17 | falling | -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7) |
Rush County | No | 152.3 (122.7, 187.8) | 28 (1, 90) | 19 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6) |
Spencer County | No | 132.1 (106.1, 163.2) | 75 (5, 92) | 20 | falling | -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
Posey County | Yes | 108.1 (87.2, 132.9) | 89 (36, 92) | 20 | falling | -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6) |
Fountain County | No | 155.4 (126.0, 190.6) | 22 (1, 88) | 21 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7) |
Tipton County | No | 171.5 (139.0, 210.6) | 6 (1, 84) | 21 | stable | -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9) |
Vermillion County | No | 181.2 (147.0, 222.0) | 3 (1, 79) | 22 | falling | -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
Perry County | No | 158.3 (129.2, 192.9) | 15 (1, 88) | 22 | stable | -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8) |
Sullivan County | No | 157.2 (128.6, 191.1) | 16 (1, 88) | 23 | falling | -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4) |
Jay County | No | 153.4 (126.3, 185.3) | 26 (1, 88) | 23 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
Owen County | No | 160.8 (132.5, 194.0) | 11 (1, 87) | 24 | stable | 5.0 (-1.2, 11.5) |
Fulton County | No | 158.8 (131.4, 191.1) | 14 (1, 88) | 25 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Franklin County | No | 160.1 (133.0, 191.6) | 12 (1, 85) | 26 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6) |
Starke County | No | 161.1 (134.4, 192.1) | 10 (1, 85) | 27 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8) |
Ripley County | No | 130.1 (108.7, 154.9) | 76 (10, 92) | 27 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
White County | No | 143.7 (119.8, 171.6) | 53 (3, 90) | 28 | falling | -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Decatur County | No | 147.5 (123.5, 175.3) | 41 (3, 90) | 28 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3) |
Fayette County | No | 155.5 (130.0, 185.2) | 21 (2, 87) | 28 | stable | -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0) |
Orange County | No | 195.0 (162.9, 232.3) | 2 (1, 51) | 28 | stable | 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6) |
Washington County | No | 156.0 (130.7, 185.1) | 19 (1, 86) | 28 | stable | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3) |
Randolph County | No | 139.0 (116.1, 165.7) | 62 (4, 91) | 29 | falling | -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
Clay County | No | 151.2 (127.0, 179.1) | 32 (2, 87) | 29 | stable | -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8) |
Wells County | No | 144.4 (121.0, 171.5) | 50 (3, 90) | 30 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6) |
Jennings County | No | 164.3 (138.6, 193.7) | 7 (1, 82) | 30 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
LaGrange County | No | 143.6 (121.3, 168.9) | 54 (4, 90) | 31 | stable | -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6) |
Adams County | No | 134.0 (112.9, 158.1) | 71 (6, 91) | 31 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2) |
Daviess County | No | 147.8 (124.9, 173.9) | 40 (3, 89) | 31 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3) |
Steuben County | No | 124.7 (105.2, 147.1) | 83 (21, 92) | 32 | falling | -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7) |
Jasper County | No | 135.3 (114.9, 158.8) | 69 (7, 91) | 33 | falling | -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3) |
Gibson County | No | 137.0 (116.1, 160.8) | 67 (7, 91) | 33 | falling | -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3) |
Miami County | No | 139.0 (118.1, 163.0) | 61 (6, 90) | 33 | falling | -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2) |
Scott County | No | 206.5 (175.6, 241.6) | 1 (1, 28) | 33 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
Greene County | No | 149.6 (127.8, 174.6) | 37 (3, 86) | 36 | stable | 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0) |
Montgomery County | No | 123.0 (105.4, 143.1) | 85 (26, 92) | 36 | falling | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
Clinton County | No | 163.7 (140.3, 190.2) | 8 (1, 75) | 38 | stable | -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3) |
Putnam County | No | 150.3 (129.2, 174.4) | 36 (3, 86) | 38 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4) |
Jefferson County | No | 161.2 (138.7, 186.8) | 9 (1, 79) | 38 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Wabash County | No | 147.0 (125.2, 172.0) | 43 (4, 88) | 39 | falling | -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
Cass County | No | 137.8 (118.6, 159.7) | 65 (7, 90) | 39 | falling | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
Huntington County | No | 142.8 (123.0, 165.3) | 56 (5, 89) | 39 | falling | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
Whitley County | No | 151.8 (130.6, 175.8) | 30 (3, 85) | 39 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4) |
Dubois County | No | 124.6 (107.3, 144.2) | 84 (24, 92) | 40 | stable | -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4) |
Harrison County | No | 141.6 (122.4, 163.3) | 57 (6, 88) | 41 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
Knox County | No | 152.2 (131.6, 175.5) | 29 (2, 85) | 42 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0) |
Jackson County | No | 139.9 (121.3, 160.6) | 59 (7, 89) | 43 | stable | -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4) |
Marshall County | No | 126.6 (109.7, 145.6) | 80 (23, 91) | 44 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
DeKalb County | No | 153.1 (133.4, 175.2) | 27 (3, 82) | 45 | stable | -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0) |
Noble County | No | 155.1 (135.3, 177.0) | 23 (2, 80) | 47 | stable | -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1) |
Dearborn County | No | 135.4 (118.4, 154.6) | 68 (13, 90) | 48 | falling | -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3) |
Shelby County | No | 155.7 (136.6, 177.0) | 20 (3, 79) | 50 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Lawrence County | No | 145.2 (127.4, 165.0) | 49 (6, 86) | 52 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Boone County | No | 150.5 (133.5, 169.2) | 34 (4, 83) | 58 | falling | -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2) |
Warrick County | No | 133.0 (118.0, 149.5) | 74 (21, 90) | 60 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4) |
Henry County | No | 176.8 (157.4, 198.3) | 4 (1, 45) | 65 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Hancock County | No | 125.4 (111.9, 140.2) | 82 (31, 91) | 65 | falling | -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
Kosciusko County | No | 133.9 (120.0, 149.1) | 72 (20, 89) | 71 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
Morgan County | No | 154.5 (138.8, 171.6) | 24 (4, 75) | 74 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Floyd County | No | 139.5 (125.4, 154.9) | 60 (14, 87) | 75 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
Bartholomew County | No | 133.8 (120.4, 148.4) | 73 (22, 88) | 76 | falling | -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
Wayne County | No | 147.9 (132.8, 164.5) | 39 (7, 79) | 76 | falling | -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2) |
Grant County | No | 150.3 (135.3, 166.7) | 35 (5, 78) | 79 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
Monroe County | Yes | 116.1 (105.7, 127.4) | 87 (65, 92) | 95 | falling | -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9) |
Howard County | No | 156.9 (142.9, 172.0) | 17 (4, 69) | 100 | falling | -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1) |
Vigo County | No | 151.5 (138.8, 165.1) | 31 (7, 74) | 114 | falling | -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4) |
LaPorte County | No | 143.3 (131.4, 156.1) | 55 (12, 79) | 115 | falling | -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7) |
Clark County | No | 146.0 (134.2, 158.7) | 46 (11, 78) | 117 | falling | -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
Delaware County | No | 149.2 (137.1, 162.1) | 38 (8, 76) | 121 | falling | -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8) |
Tippecanoe County | No | 126.1 (116.0, 136.8) | 81 (48, 89) | 122 | falling | -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
Hendricks County | No | 129.8 (119.8, 140.5) | 78 (40, 88) | 128 | falling | -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
Johnson County | No | 140.1 (129.6, 151.2) | 58 (20, 82) | 136 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Madison County | No | 150.8 (139.5, 162.9) | 33 (8, 72) | 142 | falling | -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4) |
Porter County | No | 144.4 (134.5, 154.9) | 51 (15, 76) | 167 | falling | -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5) |
Elkhart County | No | 138.7 (129.6, 148.4) | 63 (24, 80) | 179 | falling | -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5) |
Vanderburgh County | No | 146.5 (137.0, 156.6) | 44 (13, 73) | 193 | stable | 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8) |
Hamilton County | Yes | 110.8 (103.9, 118.1) | 88 (80, 92) | 196 | falling | -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3) |
St. Joseph County | No | 146.4 (138.4, 154.7) | 45 (17, 71) | 270 | falling | -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5) |
Allen County | No | 138.0 (131.3, 145.1) | 64 (34, 78) | 326 | falling | -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1) |
Lake County | No | 145.7 (140.0, 151.7) | 48 (21, 67) | 506 | falling | -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3) |
Marion County | No | 147.1 (142.5, 151.8) | 42 (22, 59) | 811 | falling | -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/28/2024 4:03 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/28/2024 4:03 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.