Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana No 169.3 (167.9, 170.7) N/A 12,180 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.2)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Adams County No 171.5 (153.3, 191.2) 54 (7, 89) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Allen County No 163.1 (157.1, 169.2) 71 (46, 83) 596 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Bartholomew County No 151.4 (140.4, 163.1) 86 (52, 91) 146 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Benton County No 158.9 (127.5, 196.6) 75 (4, 92) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Blackford County No 211.3 (182.2, 244.5) 3 (1, 70) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Boone County No 166.7 (153.0, 181.4) 67 (20, 88) 112 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Brown County No 161.8 (138.7, 188.5) 72 (9, 92) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Carroll County No 139.0 (120.0, 160.6) 90 (47, 92) 40 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Cass County No 175.1 (158.4, 193.4) 41 (7, 86) 85 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Clark County No 172.5 (162.3, 183.1) 48 (19, 79) 225 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Clay County No 192.8 (172.3, 215.2) 13 (1, 73) 68 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Clinton County No 191.6 (172.2, 212.9) 14 (2, 74) 75 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Crawford County No 188.2 (157.5, 223.8) 22 (1, 90) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Daviess County No 166.8 (148.6, 186.8) 65 (11, 91) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
DeKalb County No 177.8 (161.8, 195.1) 34 (7, 83) 94 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Dearborn County No 169.2 (155.0, 184.5) 61 (14, 88) 110 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Decatur County No 175.7 (155.7, 197.7) 38 (4, 89) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Delaware County No 180.0 (169.8, 190.8) 31 (11, 69) 243 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Dubois County No 148.5 (134.3, 164.0) 88 (48, 92) 83 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Elkhart County No 157.7 (150.0, 165.7) 77 (53, 88) 332 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Fayette County No 180.7 (160.2, 203.4) 30 (3, 87) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Floyd County No 166.7 (154.8, 179.4) 66 (22, 87) 152 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Fountain County No 215.2 (189.7, 243.8) 2 (1, 53) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Franklin County No 177.6 (156.5, 201.0) 35 (4, 89) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Fulton County No 189.6 (166.7, 215.1) 20 (1, 83) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Gibson County No 160.6 (143.9, 179.0) 73 (18, 91) 70 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Grant County No 190.5 (177.3, 204.5) 18 (4, 59) 164 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Greene County No 194.3 (176.1, 214.1) 11 (2, 66) 88 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Hamilton County No 130.7 (124.7, 136.8) 92 (88, 92) 380 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Hancock County No 155.6 (144.1, 167.7) 83 (41, 90) 142 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Harrison County No 176.9 (160.7, 194.4) 36 (7, 83) 92 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Hendricks County No 158.9 (150.2, 167.9) 76 (46, 88) 261 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Henry County No 202.8 (187.3, 219.3) 9 (1, 37) 133 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Howard County No 188.2 (176.4, 200.6) 21 (5, 60) 202 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.0, 2.5)
Huntington County No 185.0 (167.8, 203.6) 26 (4, 77) 89 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Jackson County No 181.2 (165.1, 198.5) 29 (4, 79) 97 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Jasper County No 157.1 (140.4, 175.5) 80 (23, 92) 68 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Jay County No 169.2 (147.5, 193.6) 60 (6, 91) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Jefferson County No 205.6 (186.0, 226.8) 6 (1, 49) 85 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Jennings County No 206.7 (185.1, 230.3) 5 (1, 54) 70 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Johnson County No 165.7 (157.0, 174.8) 69 (33, 83) 277 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Knox County No 176.6 (160.0, 194.6) 37 (7, 84) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Kosciusko County No 153.4 (142.3, 165.3) 85 (46, 91) 146 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
LaGrange County No 170.2 (152.2, 189.8) 58 (9, 89) 68 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
LaPorte County No 172.0 (162.0, 182.7) 50 (19, 80) 230 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Lake County No 175.4 (169.6, 181.4) 40 (23, 65) 725 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Lawrence County No 174.0 (159.8, 189.4) 43 (11, 83) 115 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Madison County No 175.4 (166.1, 185.2) 39 (16, 74) 279 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Marion County No 171.1 (166.6, 175.7) 55 (33, 69) 1,175 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Marshall County No 157.7 (143.4, 173.2) 78 (29, 91) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Martin County No 173.3 (143.7, 207.8) 45 (2, 92) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Miami County No 178.2 (160.7, 197.2) 33 (5, 83) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Monroe County No 141.6 (132.6, 151.0) 89 (76, 92) 196 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Montgomery County No 156.1 (141.1, 172.5) 82 (27, 91) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Morgan County No 171.7 (159.3, 184.7) 51 (16, 83) 152 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Newton County No 164.8 (140.3, 193.0) 70 (5, 92) 34 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Noble County No 185.5 (169.2, 203.1) 24 (4, 73) 102 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Ohio County No 167.0 (132.6, 209.9) 64 (2, 92) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Orange County No 207.4 (183.3, 234.1) 4 (1, 57) 57 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Owen County No 191.3 (168.5, 216.5) 16 (1, 80) 55 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Parke County No 166.4 (143.1, 192.8) 68 (6, 92) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Perry County No 174.2 (152.0, 199.0) 42 (3, 89) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Pike County No 194.1 (165.7, 226.6) 12 (1, 84) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Porter County No 167.2 (158.9, 175.8) 63 (30, 82) 324 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Posey County No 159.9 (141.1, 180.9) 74 (13, 92) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Pulaski County No 204.2 (175.0, 237.6) 8 (1, 77) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Putnam County No 191.5 (173.7, 210.7) 15 (2, 68) 89 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Randolph County No 172.9 (154.0, 193.7) 46 (7, 89) 64 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Ripley County No 171.1 (152.6, 191.5) 56 (8, 89) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Rush County No 171.5 (147.8, 198.3) 53 (5, 91) 39 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Scott County No 234.7 (210.0, 261.7) 1 (1, 18) 69 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Shelby County No 188.1 (172.2, 205.1) 23 (3, 68) 109 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Spencer County No 157.4 (136.9, 180.4) 79 (16, 92) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
St. Joseph County No 168.5 (161.6, 175.6) 62 (32, 77) 479 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
Starke County No 194.6 (172.8, 218.6) 10 (1, 74) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Steuben County No 156.8 (140.9, 174.3) 81 (23, 91) 76 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Sullivan County No 190.0 (166.8, 215.9) 19 (1, 82) 51 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Switzerland County No 171.5 (141.6, 206.5) 52 (2, 92) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Tippecanoe County No 151.2 (142.6, 160.2) 87 (62, 91) 241 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Tipton County No 172.7 (148.1, 200.8) 47 (3, 91) 38 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Union County No 190.9 (153.9, 235.3) 17 (1, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Vanderburgh County No 172.2 (164.2, 180.5) 49 (24, 75) 373 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Vermillion County No 205.4 (178.8, 235.4) 7 (1, 69) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Vigo County No 184.1 (173.3, 195.4) 27 (8, 61) 227 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Wabash County No 185.3 (167.2, 205.0) 25 (3, 79) 86 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Warren County No 135.8 (108.4, 169.3) 91 (21, 92) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Warrick County No 153.9 (141.7, 167.0) 84 (42, 91) 122 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Washington County No 183.1 (163.2, 205.0) 28 (3, 83) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Wayne County No 173.7 (161.3, 186.9) 44 (14, 80) 154 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Wells County No 169.7 (151.2, 190.0) 59 (8, 90) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
White County No 179.0 (159.0, 201.3) 32 (4, 87) 62 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Whitley County No 171.0 (154.2, 189.3) 57 (10, 88) 79 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 7:49 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top