Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.5) N/A 543 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.7, 2.4)
United States N/A *** 6.6 (6.6, 6.6) N/A 28,305 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Marion County Urban *** 8.3 (7.5, 9.2) 5 (2, 16) 88 stable stable trend -5.1 (-12.2, 2.6)
Lake County Urban *** 7.4 (6.5, 8.4) 11 (4, 25) 50 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.9)
Allen County Urban *** 6.7 (5.6, 7.9) 19 (6, 34) 31 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.7)
St. Joseph County Urban *** 5.4 (4.4, 6.7) 34 (13, 42) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.9)
Vanderburgh County Urban *** 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 20 (4, 38) 16 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.2, 3.8)
Hamilton County Urban *** 4.4 (3.5, 5.6) 40 (23, 44) 16
*
*
Porter County Urban *** 6.4 (5.0, 8.1) 21 (4, 41) 15
*
*
LaPorte County Urban *** 7.1 (5.3, 9.3) 14 (2, 39) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 4.0)
Elkhart County Urban *** 4.3 (3.2, 5.6) 41 (23, 44) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.3)
Johnson County Urban *** 5.5 (4.1, 7.2) 32 (9, 43) 11
*
*
Hendricks County Urban *** 5.5 (4.1, 7.2) 33 (9, 44) 11 stable stable trend -17.9 (-32.6, 2.0)
Vigo County Urban *** 7.5 (5.6, 10.0) 10 (1, 38) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.5, 5.8)
Clark County Urban *** 5.8 (4.3, 7.8) 27 (6, 44) 10
*
*
Tippecanoe County Urban *** 5.7 (4.2, 7.6) 28 (7, 43) 10
*
*
Delaware County Urban *** 5.6 (4.0, 7.8) 29 (6, 44) 8
*
*
Madison County Urban *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.2) 38 (16, 44) 8 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.2, 14.5)
Howard County Urban *** 6.2 (4.4, 8.6) 23 (3, 43) 8
*
*
Bartholomew County Urban *** 7.0 (4.9, 9.8) 17 (2, 42) 7
*
*
Monroe County Urban *** 5.5 (3.9, 7.7) 30 (7, 44) 7
*
*
Grant County Rural *** 6.8 (4.7, 9.8) 18 (1, 43) 7
*
*
Morgan County Urban *** 6.4 (4.3, 9.2) 22 (2, 44) 6
*
*
Dearborn County Urban *** 8.2 (5.6, 12.0) 6 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Wayne County Rural *** 6.0 (4.1, 8.8) 24 (3, 44) 6 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.7)
Hancock County Urban *** 5.5 (3.7, 8.0) 31 (5, 44) 6
*
*
Shelby County Urban *** 7.9 (5.1, 11.9) 8 (1, 43) 5
*
*
Henry County Rural *** 7.0 (4.5, 10.7) 15 (1, 44) 5
*
*
Floyd County Urban *** 4.2 (2.7, 6.5) 43 (14, 44) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 3.3)
Kosciusko County Rural *** 4.0 (2.5, 6.2) 44 (15, 44) 4
*
*
Cass County Rural *** 8.2 (4.9, 13.0) 7 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 7.1 (4.4, 11.1) 13 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Jennings County Rural *** 11.2 (6.9, 17.5) 1 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Montgomery County Rural *** 8.3 (5.1, 13.1) 4 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 7.6 (4.5, 12.3) 9 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Huntington County Rural *** 7.3 (4.3, 11.7) 12 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Boone County Urban *** 4.5 (2.6, 7.2) 39 (9, 44) 4
*
*
Harrison County Urban *** 5.9 (3.5, 9.7) 25 (2, 44) 4
*
*
Warrick County Urban *** 4.2 (2.5, 6.9) 42 (11, 44) 4
*
*
White County Rural *** 9.0 (5.3, 14.9) 3 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Noble County Rural *** 5.4 (3.1, 8.9) 35 (3, 44) 3
*
*
Putnam County Rural *** 7.0 (4.0, 11.6) 16 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Starke County Rural *** 9.7 (5.6, 16.1) 2 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Jefferson County Rural *** 5.9 (3.3, 10.0) 26 (2, 44) 3
*
*
Lawrence County Rural *** 4.6 (2.6, 7.7) 37 (7, 44) 3
*
*
Marshall County Rural *** 5.0 (2.9, 8.4) 36 (4, 44) 3
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dubois County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gibson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaGrange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miami County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steuben County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Whitley County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top