Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Pancreas, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana *** 11.7 (11.4, 12.0) N/A 940 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 43,836 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Decatur County *** 8.8 (5.0, 14.7) 65 (5, 67) 3
*
*
Fayette County *** 9.5 (5.4, 16.0) 61 (3, 67) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Martin County *** 20.7 (11.7, 35.0) 1 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Pulaski County *** 16.0 (9.1, 27.1) 2 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Tipton County *** 15.2 (8.4, 25.8) 5 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Carroll County *** 12.5 (7.3, 20.3) 26 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Jennings County *** 10.8 (6.3, 17.4) 51 (2, 67) 4
*
*
LaGrange County *** 8.4 (4.9, 13.5) 67 (8, 67) 4
*
*
Posey County *** 10.7 (6.2, 17.3) 53 (2, 67) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.7)
Daviess County *** 11.2 (6.9, 17.2) 42 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Scott County *** 13.3 (8.1, 20.8) 19 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.3)
Putnam County *** 8.8 (5.5, 13.6) 66 (8, 67) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Wells County *** 10.4 (6.5, 16.2) 55 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Adams County *** 11.0 (6.9, 16.7) 49 (2, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Franklin County *** 14.5 (9.1, 22.3) 13 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Wabash County *** 9.5 (5.9, 14.8) 62 (6, 67) 5
*
*
Jasper County *** 10.7 (6.8, 16.4) 52 (2, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Ripley County *** 12.3 (7.8, 18.8) 28 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Washington County *** 14.8 (9.6, 22.2) 9 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.3)
Clay County *** 14.6 (9.6, 21.7) 10 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 3.9)
Dubois County *** 9.4 (6.1, 13.9) 63 (9, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Gibson County *** 11.5 (7.5, 17.0) 38 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Miami County *** 11.3 (7.4, 16.8) 39 (2, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Whitley County *** 11.2 (7.3, 16.7) 41 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Steuben County *** 10.9 (7.2, 16.1) 50 (3, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Clinton County *** 15.0 (10.0, 21.7) 6 (1, 66) 6
*
*
Greene County *** 12.7 (8.5, 18.5) 24 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 3.8)
Harrison County *** 11.3 (7.5, 16.4) 40 (2, 67) 6
*
*
Knox County *** 12.2 (8.1, 17.7) 31 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Huntington County *** 13.8 (9.4, 19.8) 17 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Marshall County *** 10.1 (6.9, 14.5) 56 (6, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Montgomery County *** 11.9 (8.2, 17.0) 33 (2, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Jackson County *** 12.6 (8.7, 17.7) 25 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Noble County *** 11.8 (8.2, 16.6) 35 (2, 67) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Lawrence County *** 11.2 (7.8, 15.7) 43 (4, 67) 7
*
*
Cass County *** 15.9 (11.1, 22.1) 3 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.1)
DeKalb County *** 14.6 (10.3, 20.3) 11 (1, 64) 8
*
*
Warrick County *** 9.9 (7.0, 13.6) 58 (10, 67) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Shelby County *** 13.9 (9.9, 19.1) 16 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.4)
Wayne County *** 9.6 (7.0, 13.1) 60 (12, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Dearborn County *** 14.9 (10.8, 20.1) 8 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
Boone County *** 14.5 (10.7, 19.3) 12 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Bartholomew County *** 10.1 (7.4, 13.4) 57 (10, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Morgan County *** 11.5 (8.5, 15.4) 36 (4, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Henry County *** 15.2 (11.3, 20.2) 4 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.0)
Grant County *** 12.4 (9.3, 16.3) 27 (3, 65) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Floyd County *** 11.5 (8.7, 15.1) 37 (4, 66) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Hancock County *** 14.2 (10.9, 18.3) 15 (1, 59) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Kosciusko County *** 14.9 (11.7, 18.9) 7 (1, 53) 15 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.7, 3.5)
Howard County *** 12.8 (10.0, 16.2) 21 (3, 62) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Clark County *** 11.0 (8.6, 13.8) 48 (9, 66) 15 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Monroe County *** 11.0 (8.7, 13.8) 47 (9, 65) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Delaware County *** 11.9 (9.4, 14.8) 34 (6, 64) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Hendricks County *** 9.7 (7.8, 12.1) 59 (19, 67) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
LaPorte County *** 13.0 (10.4, 16.0) 20 (3, 59) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Johnson County *** 11.1 (8.9, 13.6) 46 (11, 66) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Vigo County *** 14.4 (11.6, 17.7) 14 (1, 53) 19 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.9, 3.3)
Elkhart County *** 9.2 (7.5, 11.2) 64 (31, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Madison County *** 12.3 (10.0, 14.9) 29 (5, 62) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Tippecanoe County *** 12.7 (10.4, 15.4) 23 (4, 59) 21 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.1, 8.9)
Porter County *** 10.6 (8.6, 12.8) 54 (16, 65) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Vanderburgh County *** 12.0 (10.1, 14.3) 32 (7, 60) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Hamilton County *** 11.1 (9.5, 12.9) 45 (14, 62) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
St. Joseph County *** 12.8 (11.1, 14.7) 22 (7, 52) 42 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Allen County *** 13.4 (11.9, 15.1) 18 (5, 45) 58 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Lake County *** 11.1 (10.0, 12.4) 44 (21, 59) 69 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Marion County *** 12.2 (11.2, 13.2) 30 (14, 49) 118 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2021 11:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top