Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana No 44.9 (44.2, 45.6) N/A 3,698 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.2, -3.3)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Marion County No 46.9 (44.9, 48.9) 51 (34, 63) 457 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.3, -3.2)
Lake County No 40.9 (38.7, 43.3) 74 (55, 85) 256 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.1, -2.9)
Allen County No 39.1 (36.4, 41.9) 82 (60, 89) 168 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
St. Joseph County No 42.0 (38.9, 45.3) 71 (45, 85) 140 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.8)
Vanderburgh County No 45.2 (41.4, 49.3) 55 (30, 78) 108 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.0)
Madison County No 53.7 (49.0, 58.9) 23 (8, 53) 96 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Porter County No 43.2 (39.3, 47.4) 64 (36, 85) 93 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Elkhart County No 38.2 (34.7, 41.9) 86 (58, 90) 91 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.8)
Clark County No 55.0 (49.6, 60.8) 19 (5, 53) 80 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Hamilton County No 25.4 (22.9, 28.1) 92 (89, 92) 79 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.6, -2.6)
Johnson County No 44.2 (39.8, 48.8) 60 (30, 84) 78 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Delaware County No 50.0 (44.9, 55.5) 35 (12, 71) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Hendricks County No 40.0 (35.9, 44.4) 75 (47, 90) 72 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
LaPorte County No 46.5 (41.7, 51.8) 52 (20, 79) 70 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Vigo County No 50.0 (44.7, 55.7) 36 (11, 69) 68 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Tippecanoe County No 38.9 (34.7, 43.3) 83 (52, 90) 67 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.4, -2.4)
Howard County No 49.0 (43.5, 55.1) 43 (13, 77) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Monroe County No 37.2 (32.8, 42.0) 88 (55, 91) 55 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.6)
Grant County No 53.4 (46.8, 60.6) 25 (5, 63) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Floyd County No 48.3 (42.2, 55.0) 47 (12, 78) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Wayne County No 48.7 (42.6, 55.6) 46 (11, 83) 47 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.8)
Morgan County No 50.1 (43.7, 57.3) 34 (9, 73) 46 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Kosciusko County No 43.7 (38.0, 50.1) 62 (23, 88) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Hancock County No 44.6 (38.7, 51.1) 58 (22, 88) 43 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Bartholomew County No 39.8 (34.5, 45.8) 76 (40, 90) 41 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.2, -1.3)
Henry County No 56.2 (48.5, 64.9) 14 (3, 63) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Shelby County No 59.0 (50.5, 68.5) 10 (2, 58) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Warrick County No 41.1 (35.2, 47.7) 73 (29, 90) 36 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Dearborn County No 51.7 (44.2, 60.3) 30 (6, 76) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Lawrence County No 48.9 (41.7, 57.2) 45 (8, 83) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Noble County No 49.9 (42.0, 59.0) 37 (6, 83) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Jackson County No 51.5 (43.4, 60.8) 31 (5, 83) 29 falling falling trend -7.4 (-14.2, -0.1)
Greene County No 61.2 (51.5, 72.5) 9 (1, 54) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Harrison County No 49.8 (41.7, 59.2) 39 (6, 84) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Putnam County No 56.0 (46.9, 66.4) 16 (2, 70) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Jefferson County No 62.2 (52.0, 74.0) 6 (1, 53) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
DeKalb County No 49.0 (40.9, 58.2) 42 (7, 86) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Boone County No 38.8 (32.4, 46.1) 84 (34, 91) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Jennings County No 72.8 (60.5, 87.0) 2 (1, 31) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Knox County No 49.3 (40.9, 59.0) 41 (5, 86) 25 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Marshall County No 37.5 (31.0, 45.1) 87 (37, 91) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Scott County No 74.4 (61.3, 89.7) 1 (1, 31) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Washington County No 62.0 (51.0, 74.7) 7 (1, 61) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Cass County No 44.0 (36.2, 53.2) 61 (15, 90) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Starke County No 66.3 (54.5, 80.3) 4 (1, 47) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Whitley County No 47.8 (39.2, 57.8) 48 (6, 88) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Huntington County No 45.3 (37.2, 54.9) 54 (9, 90) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Wabash County No 46.4 (37.9, 56.4) 53 (8, 89) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Clinton County No 52.5 (43.0, 63.6) 28 (3, 84) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Montgomery County No 39.4 (32.2, 47.8) 80 (28, 91) 22 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.5, -1.4)
Clay County No 58.9 (48.1, 71.7) 11 (1, 69) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Miami County No 44.3 (36.1, 53.9) 59 (11, 90) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Steuben County No 38.7 (31.4, 47.4) 85 (28, 91) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
LaGrange County No 47.2 (38.2, 57.6) 50 (8, 90) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Gibson County No 42.4 (34.3, 52.0) 68 (15, 90) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Randolph County No 49.4 (39.8, 61.0) 40 (5, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Fayette County No 54.3 (43.7, 67.1) 22 (2, 85) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Jasper County No 39.8 (31.9, 49.1) 77 (25, 91) 18 falling falling trend -7.2 (-12.0, -2.2)
White County No 49.9 (39.9, 62.0) 38 (3, 88) 18 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.8, -1.1)
Owen County No 56.7 (45.3, 70.5) 13 (1, 81) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Adams County No 42.6 (34.1, 52.7) 67 (15, 91) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Daviess County No 43.1 (34.5, 53.3) 65 (13, 90) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Ripley County No 44.8 (35.8, 55.5) 57 (10, 90) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Dubois County No 27.6 (21.8, 34.6) 91 (80, 92) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Fulton County No 52.2 (41.3, 65.6) 29 (2, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Orange County No 56.0 (44.2, 70.4) 15 (1, 85) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Wells County No 39.7 (31.2, 50.1) 78 (19, 92) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Sullivan County No 53.5 (41.9, 67.6) 24 (1, 88) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Decatur County No 42.0 (32.8, 53.1) 72 (13, 91) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Brown County No 55.0 (42.7, 70.7) 18 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Perry County No 52.6 (40.9, 67.0) 27 (2, 88) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Posey County No 39.3 (30.5, 50.1) 81 (20, 91) 14 stable stable trend -19.6 (-38.0, 4.3)
Franklin County No 42.2 (32.5, 54.2) 69 (8, 91) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Parke County No 52.9 (40.7, 68.0) 26 (1, 89) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Spencer County No 42.1 (32.3, 54.3) 70 (10, 91) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Fountain County No 50.9 (39.1, 65.8) 33 (3, 90) 13 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Newton County No 58.5 (44.9, 75.6) 12 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Jay County No 44.9 (34.4, 57.9) 56 (5, 91) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Blackford County No 63.1 (48.2, 82.0) 5 (1, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Vermillion County No 54.5 (41.5, 70.8) 20 (1, 89) 12 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.6, -0.6)
Crawford County No 66.4 (49.6, 87.9) 3 (1, 79) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Carroll County No 37.0 (27.7, 48.8) 89 (21, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Pike County No 55.6 (41.6, 73.6) 17 (1, 89) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Rush County No 42.8 (31.8, 57.0) 66 (6, 92) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.3)
Martin County No 61.2 (44.8, 82.6) 8 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Pulaski County No 48.9 (35.5, 66.4) 44 (2, 91) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Switzerland County No 54.5 (38.8, 75.1) 21 (1, 90) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Tipton County No 33.6 (23.4, 47.3) 90 (23, 92) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Benton County No 47.3 (31.6, 69.1) 49 (1, 92) 6 falling falling trend -6.7 (-12.6, -0.3)
Warren County No 43.4 (28.7, 64.3) 63 (3, 92) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Ohio County No 51.0 (32.9, 78.1) 32 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Union County No 39.6 (24.7, 61.9) 79 (3, 92) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2022 9:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top