Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A No 42.1 (41.5, 42.8) N/A 3,595 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.7)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Whitley County Urban No 48.8 (40.3, 58.8) 30 (4, 83) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
White County Rural No 47.9 (38.4, 59.5) 33 (4, 88) 18 falling falling trend -3.1 (-11.0, -1.3)
Wells County Urban No 40.2 (31.6, 50.6) 71 (13, 91) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-9.7, -0.4)
Wayne County Rural No 47.4 (41.4, 54.1) 38 (10, 76) 46 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -2.4)
Washington County Urban No 59.6 (49.0, 72.0) 6 (1, 57) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Warrick County Urban No 41.2 (35.4, 47.8) 65 (19, 88) 37 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Warren County Urban No 37.0 (23.8, 56.4) 79 (4, 92) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Wabash County Rural No 42.6 (34.8, 51.9) 59 (12, 90) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Vigo County Urban No 45.4 (40.4, 50.8) 49 (16, 77) 63 falling falling trend -2.6 (-7.2, -1.6)
Vermillion County Urban No 59.5 (45.7, 76.6) 7 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Vanderburgh County Urban No 41.6 (37.9, 45.5) 63 (34, 81) 100 falling falling trend -3.5 (-7.0, -2.4)
Union County Rural No 43.4 (27.5, 66.9) 54 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.4)
Tipton County Urban No 30.8 (21.6, 43.4) 90 (34, 92) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Tippecanoe County Urban No 39.4 (35.3, 44.0) 74 (38, 88) 67 falling falling trend -2.4 (-7.4, -1.8)
Switzerland County Rural No 60.6 (43.2, 83.4) 5 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Sullivan County Urban No 49.2 (38.2, 62.7) 29 (2, 88) 14 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Steuben County Rural No 37.2 (30.0, 45.8) 78 (26, 91) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Starke County Rural No 54.8 (44.3, 67.5) 14 (1, 76) 20 falling falling trend -17.6 (-33.5, -1.3)
St. Joseph County Urban No 40.4 (37.4, 43.6) 70 (42, 83) 139 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -1.4)
Spencer County Rural No 36.6 (27.6, 48.2) 81 (18, 92) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Shelby County Urban No 46.0 (38.8, 54.3) 46 (8, 85) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.2)
Scott County Rural No 72.9 (60.3, 87.7) 1 (1, 22) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Rush County Rural No 47.9 (36.4, 62.3) 34 (2, 90) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Ripley County Rural No 38.2 (30.1, 48.0) 76 (19, 91) 16 falling falling trend -8.4 (-23.6, -2.0)
Randolph County Rural No 51.1 (41.2, 63.0) 20 (2, 82) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Putnam County Rural No 58.2 (49.1, 68.7) 11 (1, 53) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Pulaski County Rural No 46.2 (33.8, 62.7) 45 (2, 91) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.2)
Posey County Urban No 31.9 (24.1, 41.7) 89 (40, 92) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Porter County Urban No 39.9 (36.2, 43.9) 72 (40, 86) 91 falling falling trend -9.3 (-15.1, -1.6)
Pike County Rural No 49.6 (36.1, 67.1) 27 (1, 90) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Perry County Rural No 47.8 (36.6, 61.8) 35 (2, 90) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Parke County Rural No 44.8 (33.5, 59.3) 51 (3, 91) 11 falling falling trend -3.8 (-17.1, -1.3)
Owen County Urban No 47.7 (37.5, 60.3) 37 (3, 88) 16 falling falling trend -3.7 (-15.2, -1.6)
Orange County Rural No 55.1 (43.4, 69.3) 13 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Ohio County Urban No 49.6 (32.5, 75.2) 25 (1, 92) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-8.1, -0.4)
Noble County Rural No 46.6 (39.0, 55.5) 41 (8, 86) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-10.1, -0.8)
Newton County Urban No 58.5 (44.9, 75.6) 9 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Morgan County Urban No 47.7 (41.7, 54.5) 36 (10, 78) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.2, -1.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 41.2 (33.8, 49.9) 67 (16, 90) 22 falling falling trend -2.8 (-9.9, -1.0)
Monroe County Urban No 36.3 (32.0, 41.1) 83 (51, 90) 54 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -1.8)
Miami County Rural No 46.9 (38.6, 56.7) 39 (5, 87) 23 falling falling trend -3.2 (-10.8, -1.6)
Martin County Rural No 63.1 (46.3, 84.9) 3 (1, 76) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Marshall County Rural No 35.8 (29.4, 43.4) 84 (36, 91) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Marion County Urban No 44.3 (42.4, 46.2) 53 (34, 65) 443 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.7)
Madison County Urban No 49.8 (45.2, 54.6) 24 (9, 60) 91 falling falling trend -4.0 (-9.5, -1.7)
Lawrence County Rural No 49.6 (42.3, 57.9) 26 (5, 76) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-8.2, -0.8)
Lake County Urban No 34.6 (32.6, 36.7) 87 (73, 90) 228 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.6, -3.5)
LaPorte County Urban No 42.1 (37.6, 47.1) 61 (27, 85) 67 falling falling trend -4.7 (-12.3, -1.6)
LaGrange County Rural No 43.1 (34.6, 53.1) 56 (8, 90) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.6)
Kosciusko County Rural No 41.2 (35.9, 47.3) 64 (23, 88) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Knox County Rural No 50.6 (42.0, 60.6) 22 (2, 80) 25 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Johnson County Urban No 41.0 (37.0, 45.4) 68 (32, 84) 79 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Jennings County Rural No 65.5 (53.9, 79.0) 2 (1, 41) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 49.5 (40.8, 59.7) 28 (3, 84) 24 stable stable trend -16.7 (-32.2, 0.5)
Jay County Rural No 39.6 (30.0, 51.7) 73 (11, 92) 12 falling falling trend -4.2 (-13.3, -1.3)
Jasper County Urban No 45.9 (37.6, 55.8) 47 (5, 88) 22 falling falling trend -4.5 (-16.2, -1.6)
Jackson County Rural No 42.6 (35.5, 50.8) 58 (13, 90) 26 falling falling trend -6.9 (-19.4, -2.1)
Huntington County Rural No 44.5 (36.6, 53.8) 52 (9, 89) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Howard County Urban No 46.7 (41.4, 52.5) 40 (13, 75) 58 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -1.5)
Henry County Rural No 57.3 (49.7, 65.9) 12 (2, 46) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Hendricks County Urban No 36.3 (32.6, 40.4) 82 (54, 90) 71 falling falling trend -5.4 (-11.4, -2.5)
Harrison County Urban No 46.4 (38.6, 55.4) 44 (7, 86) 26 falling falling trend -5.6 (-19.6, -0.5)
Hancock County Urban No 40.9 (35.6, 46.9) 69 (26, 88) 43 stable stable trend -4.9 (-12.1, 0.3)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 24.2 (21.9, 26.7) 92 (89, 92) 84 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.5, -3.2)
Greene County Rural No 58.8 (49.1, 70.1) 8 (1, 55) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Grant County Rural No 53.5 (47.0, 60.8) 16 (3, 54) 51 falling falling trend -1.4 (-6.7, -0.7)
Gibson County Rural No 37.8 (30.0, 47.3) 77 (23, 91) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.7)
Fulton County Rural No 53.5 (42.3, 67.2) 15 (1, 80) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Franklin County Urban No 39.1 (30.0, 50.5) 75 (12, 91) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.6)
Fountain County Rural No 58.2 (45.7, 73.7) 10 (1, 76) 15 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Floyd County Urban No 46.6 (40.8, 53.0) 43 (11, 78) 49 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Fayette County Rural No 49.9 (39.9, 62.0) 23 (2, 85) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-11.6, -0.6)
Elkhart County Urban No 35.6 (32.3, 39.1) 86 (60, 90) 88 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.8, -2.0)
Dubois County Rural No 27.6 (21.8, 34.6) 91 (70, 92) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Delaware County Urban No 51.3 (46.2, 56.9) 18 (7, 56) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Decatur County Rural No 45.3 (35.8, 56.8) 50 (5, 90) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.8)
Dearborn County Urban No 52.0 (44.7, 60.4) 17 (4, 69) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
DeKalb County Rural No 42.5 (35.2, 51.1) 60 (13, 89) 25 falling falling trend -16.8 (-29.9, -1.2)
Daviess County Rural No 41.9 (33.3, 52.1) 62 (8, 91) 17 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Crawford County Rural No 48.0 (34.5, 66.4) 32 (1, 91) 9 falling falling trend -23.4 (-42.5, -0.6)
Clinton County Rural No 43.2 (34.6, 53.4) 55 (7, 89) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Clay County Urban No 45.5 (36.1, 56.7) 48 (5, 89) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Clark County Urban No 50.6 (45.6, 56.0) 21 (7, 59) 78 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -2.1)
Cass County Rural No 46.6 (38.6, 56.0) 42 (6, 85) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Carroll County Urban No 43.0 (33.0, 55.6) 57 (6, 91) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Brown County Urban No 48.5 (37.3, 63.0) 31 (2, 89) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.4)
Boone County Urban No 33.4 (27.8, 39.9) 88 (52, 92) 26 falling falling trend -6.1 (-16.0, -2.4)
Blackford County Rural No 51.1 (37.9, 68.4) 19 (1, 90) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Benton County Urban No 62.7 (44.4, 87.0) 4 (1, 87) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-13.3, -0.2)
Bartholomew County Urban No 41.2 (35.8, 47.2) 66 (27, 88) 43 falling falling trend -4.0 (-10.8, -1.8)
Allen County Urban No 36.7 (34.2, 39.3) 80 (61, 89) 165 falling falling trend -2.1 (-5.4, -1.7)
Adams County Rural No 35.7 (28.2, 44.8) 85 (26, 92) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 3:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top