Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana *** 46.7 (46.0, 47.3) N/A 3,758 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.6, -3.1)
United States *** 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) N/A 146,023 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.2, -4.5)
Hamilton County *** 27.2 (24.6, 30.1) 92 (88, 92) 80 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.5, -2.4)
Dubois County *** 29.9 (23.8, 37.1) 91 (76, 92) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Warren County *** 35.5 (22.4, 54.9) 90 (8, 92) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Monroe County *** 36.2 (31.8, 41.0) 89 (64, 91) 52 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Marshall County *** 38.4 (31.8, 46.2) 88 (37, 91) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Elkhart County *** 38.6 (35.1, 42.4) 87 (62, 90) 90 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.6)
Steuben County *** 39.3 (31.9, 48.2) 86 (32, 92) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Warrick County *** 39.6 (33.7, 46.3) 85 (42, 91) 33 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Carroll County *** 39.6 (29.8, 52.0) 84 (18, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Tippecanoe County *** 40.0 (35.8, 44.6) 83 (50, 90) 67 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.0, -2.5)
Tipton County *** 40.1 (28.8, 54.8) 82 (10, 92) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Allen County *** 41.0 (38.2, 43.9) 81 (57, 87) 173 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Union County *** 41.2 (25.6, 64.3) 80 (3, 92) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Jasper County *** 41.4 (33.3, 51.1) 79 (22, 91) 19 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.0, -1.4)
Decatur County *** 41.8 (32.7, 53.0) 78 (17, 91) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Boone County *** 41.8 (35.2, 49.4) 77 (28, 90) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Gibson County *** 41.9 (33.7, 51.6) 76 (19, 91) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Franklin County *** 42.1 (32.4, 54.1) 75 (12, 92) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Miami County *** 42.2 (34.2, 51.7) 74 (22, 91) 20 falling falling trend -6.3 (-10.4, -2.0)
Hendricks County *** 43.0 (38.6, 47.7) 73 (34, 88) 74 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Wells County *** 43.1 (34.1, 53.9) 72 (14, 91) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Porter County *** 43.2 (39.2, 47.5) 71 (40, 88) 91 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Bartholomew County *** 43.5 (37.9, 49.8) 70 (28, 89) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Lake County *** 43.5 (41.2, 46.0) 69 (49, 82) 267 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.6)
Randolph County *** 43.6 (34.7, 54.5) 68 (13, 91) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Adams County *** 43.7 (34.9, 54.1) 67 (15, 91) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Pulaski County *** 43.9 (30.8, 61.2) 66 (5, 92) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Montgomery County *** 44.5 (36.8, 53.5) 65 (18, 90) 24 falling falling trend -14.6 (-26.2, -1.3)
Kosciusko County *** 44.5 (38.7, 51.0) 64 (26, 88) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
St. Joseph County *** 44.7 (41.4, 48.1) 63 (38, 81) 146 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Wabash County *** 44.8 (36.5, 54.8) 62 (16, 90) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Ripley County *** 46.0 (36.7, 57.0) 61 (10, 91) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Hancock County *** 46.0 (39.9, 52.7) 60 (20, 88) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
LaPorte County *** 46.0 (41.2, 51.3) 59 (26, 84) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Posey County *** 46.3 (36.5, 58.3) 58 (9, 90) 16 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
LaGrange County *** 46.3 (37.4, 56.8) 57 (9, 90) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Brown County *** 46.6 (35.2, 61.5) 56 (6, 91) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Cass County *** 46.7 (38.5, 56.2) 55 (13, 90) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Daviess County *** 46.8 (37.8, 57.4) 54 (9, 90) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Huntington County *** 46.9 (38.5, 56.6) 53 (13, 90) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Johnson County *** 47.3 (42.7, 52.2) 52 (25, 81) 81 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Benton County *** 47.3 (31.3, 69.5) 51 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Vanderburgh County *** 48.0 (44.1, 52.3) 50 (26, 75) 113 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.8)
Ohio County *** 48.5 (30.6, 75.5) 49 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Marion County *** 48.7 (46.7, 50.8) 48 (31, 63) 465 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.4, -3.0)
Harrison County *** 49.0 (40.9, 58.3) 47 (9, 88) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Spencer County *** 49.1 (38.2, 62.4) 46 (3, 90) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Delaware County *** 49.3 (44.2, 54.8) 45 (17, 78) 71 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.4, -1.3)
Lawrence County *** 49.4 (42.1, 57.7) 44 (10, 85) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Wayne County *** 49.6 (43.3, 56.6) 43 (14, 81) 47 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.3, -1.9)
Howard County *** 50.0 (44.4, 56.2) 42 (13, 78) 59 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Fountain County *** 50.0 (38.2, 64.8) 41 (2, 90) 12 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Floyd County *** 50.1 (43.9, 57.0) 40 (13, 80) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Perry County *** 50.3 (38.8, 64.6) 39 (3, 90) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Knox County *** 50.4 (41.8, 60.3) 38 (7, 87) 25 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Parke County *** 50.7 (38.7, 65.6) 37 (2, 90) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
White County *** 51.6 (41.4, 63.8) 36 (4, 88) 19 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.6, -0.8)
Whitley County *** 52.2 (43.1, 62.8) 35 (4, 85) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Noble County *** 52.3 (44.0, 61.8) 34 (6, 81) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Henry County *** 52.5 (45.0, 61.0) 33 (6, 78) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Jay County *** 52.8 (41.2, 67.0) 32 (2, 89) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Morgan County *** 52.9 (46.2, 60.3) 31 (8, 72) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
DeKalb County *** 53.3 (44.8, 63.1) 30 (4, 81) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Fulton County *** 53.7 (42.4, 67.6) 29 (1, 89) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Clinton County *** 53.8 (44.1, 65.1) 28 (3, 83) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Dearborn County *** 54.3 (46.6, 63.1) 27 (5, 74) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Madison County *** 54.7 (49.9, 60.0) 26 (8, 54) 96 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Rush County *** 55.1 (42.4, 70.8) 25 (1, 89) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Fayette County *** 55.1 (44.4, 68.0) 24 (1, 87) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Grant County *** 55.2 (48.5, 62.6) 23 (6, 64) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Pike County *** 55.3 (41.4, 73.2) 22 (1, 90) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Newton County *** 56.4 (42.8, 73.5) 21 (1, 89) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Vigo County *** 57.0 (51.3, 63.2) 20 (5, 50) 75 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Jackson County *** 57.2 (48.5, 66.9) 19 (3, 70) 32 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Vermillion County *** 57.8 (44.3, 74.5) 18 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Putnam County *** 58.7 (49.3, 69.5) 17 (1, 68) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Clark County *** 58.9 (53.2, 65.1) 16 (4, 44) 82 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.6)
Switzerland County *** 59.3 (42.6, 80.9) 15 (1, 90) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Owen County *** 59.6 (47.8, 73.8) 14 (1, 81) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Orange County *** 60.2 (47.9, 75.1) 13 (1, 76) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Blackford County *** 61.0 (46.0, 80.1) 12 (1, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Shelby County *** 61.0 (52.3, 70.8) 11 (1, 52) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Jefferson County *** 61.7 (51.4, 73.7) 10 (1, 65) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Sullivan County *** 63.9 (50.9, 79.3) 9 (1, 70) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Crawford County *** 64.1 (47.4, 85.7) 8 (1, 85) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Martin County *** 64.3 (47.4, 86.1) 7 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Washington County *** 64.9 (53.5, 78.1) 6 (1, 54) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Clay County *** 65.1 (53.6, 78.6) 5 (1, 55) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Greene County *** 65.7 (55.5, 77.4) 4 (1, 44) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Scott County *** 67.5 (55.1, 82.2) 3 (1, 52) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Jennings County *** 70.7 (58.6, 84.8) 2 (1, 41) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Starke County *** 73.5 (60.9, 88.3) 1 (1, 34) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/23/2021 1:17 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top