Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A No 20.4 (19.7, 21.1) N/A 674 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 1.2)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Marion County Urban No 23.2 (21.0, 25.6) 20 (8, 37) 84 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.1)
Lake County Urban No 21.4 (18.9, 24.2) 28 (11, 46) 55 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 4.2)
Allen County Urban No 24.7 (21.4, 28.3) 11 (4, 36) 43 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
St. Joseph County Urban No 22.4 (19.0, 26.3) 22 (6, 47) 31 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 16.4 (13.4, 19.8) 51 (26, 58) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.2)
Elkhart County Urban No 20.4 (16.6, 24.9) 37 (9, 54) 20 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Vanderburgh County Urban No 20.6 (16.6, 25.2) 34 (8, 54) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 14.8)
Johnson County Urban No 21.4 (16.8, 26.8) 29 (6, 54) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.7)
Hendricks County Urban No 20.7 (16.1, 26.2) 32 (7, 56) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 12.2)
Madison County Urban No 18.4 (14.2, 23.5) 43 (12, 58) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Porter County Urban Yes 14.9 (11.4, 19.2) 56 (30, 59) 13 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.2, -1.9)
LaPorte County Urban No 22.3 (17.1, 28.6) 23 (4, 54) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Monroe County Urban No 20.6 (15.7, 26.7) 33 (6, 57) 12 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -2.2)
Delaware County Urban No 17.5 (13.2, 23.0) 49 (14, 59) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Vigo County Urban No 20.4 (15.2, 26.7) 38 (5, 57) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Kosciusko County Rural No 24.4 (18.0, 32.4) 14 (2, 54) 10 stable stable trend 20.1 (-1.2, 39.8)
Tippecanoe County Urban Yes 14.5 (10.7, 19.2) 57 (27, 59) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.3)
Bartholomew County Urban No 22.1 (16.1, 29.6) 25 (3, 56) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.3)
Howard County Urban No 17.4 (12.6, 23.4) 50 (12, 59) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.1)
Grant County Rural No 19.4 (13.7, 26.8) 39 (6, 59) 8 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.3)
Clark County Urban Yes 15.1 (10.6, 20.9) 55 (19, 59) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Montgomery County Rural No 33.2 (23.2, 46.2) 2 (1, 44) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Hancock County Urban No 17.8 (12.4, 24.8) 48 (7, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.3)
Boone County Urban No 22.3 (15.3, 31.2) 24 (2, 58) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Wayne County Rural No 18.3 (12.7, 25.7) 45 (7, 59) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.4)
Floyd County Urban No 18.0 (12.3, 25.5) 47 (7, 59) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Morgan County Urban Yes 15.2 (10.0, 22.1) 54 (14, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.0)
Marshall County Rural No 20.5 (13.5, 30.0) 35 (2, 59) 6
*
*
Randolph County Rural No 35.3 (23.4, 51.7) 1 (1, 44) 6
*
*
Warrick County Urban Yes 16.3 (10.7, 23.8) 52 (10, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.7)
Greene County Rural No 27.7 (18.1, 41.0) 5 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.2)
Steuben County Rural No 25.0 (16.3, 37.2) 9 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.2)
Shelby County Urban No 21.8 (14.1, 32.2) 27 (2, 59) 5
*
*
Putnam County Rural No 25.6 (16.4, 38.0) 7 (1, 58) 5
*
*
Dearborn County Urban No 18.3 (11.4, 27.7) 46 (4, 59) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -1.0)
Huntington County Rural No 24.0 (15.1, 36.2) 16 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Noble County Rural No 23.2 (14.7, 34.7) 19 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.3)
Wabash County Rural No 22.8 (14.6, 34.6) 21 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Whitley County Urban No 24.8 (15.5, 37.6) 10 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Dubois County Rural No 20.4 (12.8, 30.9) 36 (2, 59) 5
*
*
Harrison County Urban No 20.8 (12.9, 31.8) 31 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.7)
Jackson County Rural No 18.8 (11.8, 28.5) 42 (4, 59) 5
*
*
Jasper County Urban No 25.2 (15.7, 38.3) 8 (1, 59) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.1)
Gibson County Rural No 24.5 (15.2, 37.6) 13 (1, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Miami County Rural No 22.1 (13.7, 33.7) 26 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Daviess County Rural No 23.9 (14.2, 37.6) 18 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Lawrence County Rural Yes 14.0 (8.4, 22.1) 58 (16, 59) 4
*
*
Carroll County Urban No 28.7 (17.0, 46.0) 4 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Henry County Rural Yes 12.8 (7.6, 20.4) 59 (20, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.8, -1.7)
Jennings County Rural No 24.6 (14.3, 39.4) 12 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Cass County Rural Yes 15.7 (9.2, 25.3) 53 (7, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.9)
Fountain County Rural No 32.6 (19.1, 52.8) 3 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Franklin County Urban No 27.3 (15.7, 44.4) 6 (1, 59) 4
*
*
LaGrange County Rural No 24.0 (14.0, 37.8) 17 (1, 59) 4
*
*
Owen County Urban No 24.1 (13.6, 40.3) 15 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Ripley County Rural No 19.1 (11.0, 31.2) 41 (2, 59) 3 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.9)
Adams County Rural No 18.4 (10.5, 29.9) 44 (3, 59) 3 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.9)
Clinton County Rural No 19.3 (10.9, 31.5) 40 (2, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.2)
Wells County Urban No 21.0 (11.9, 34.6) 30 (1, 59) 3 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.5, -2.2)
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top