Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A *** 5.6 (5.4, 5.8) N/A 456 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -2.0)
United States N/A *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) N/A 20,108 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -2.1)
Decatur County Rural *** 9.9 (5.7, 16.3) 1 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Fayette County Rural *** 9.8 (5.5, 16.5) 2 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Gibson County Rural *** 9.1 (5.5, 14.3) 3 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Dubois County Rural *** 8.9 (5.7, 13.3) 4 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.7)
Harrison County Urban *** 8.0 (4.8, 12.6) 5 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Wayne County Rural *** 7.9 (5.5, 11.2) 6 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 2.3)
Clinton County Rural *** 7.8 (4.5, 12.8) 7 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Huntington County Rural *** 7.7 (4.7, 12.2) 8 (1, 45) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Boone County Urban *** 7.7 (5.1, 11.1) 9 (1, 44) 6
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 7.5 (4.4, 12.3) 10 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.3)
Miami County Rural *** 7.4 (4.2, 12.1) 11 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.2) 12 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.6)
Steuben County Rural *** 7.0 (3.8, 12.0) 13 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Whitley County Urban *** 7.0 (4.0, 11.6) 14 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Putnam County Rural *** 6.8 (3.9, 11.3) 15 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Tippecanoe County Urban *** 6.8 (5.1, 8.9) 16 (3, 41) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Noble County Rural *** 6.7 (3.9, 10.9) 17 (1, 46) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.9)
DeKalb County Rural *** 6.5 (3.7, 10.6) 18 (1, 46) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 2.0)
Henry County Rural *** 6.5 (4.1, 10.0) 19 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Elkhart County Urban *** 6.4 (5.0, 8.0) 20 (5, 41) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Delaware County Urban *** 6.4 (4.7, 8.6) 21 (3, 44) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Shelby County Urban *** 6.4 (3.7, 10.3) 22 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Johnson County Urban *** 6.3 (4.7, 8.2) 23 (4, 44) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.5)
Allen County Urban *** 5.9 (4.9, 7.0) 24 (9, 41) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.3)
Marshall County Rural *** 5.9 (3.5, 9.4) 25 (2, 46) 4
*
*
Vanderburgh County Urban *** 5.8 (4.5, 7.4) 26 (8, 44) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Dearborn County Urban *** 5.7 (3.4, 9.2) 27 (3, 46) 4
*
*
Hendricks County Urban *** 5.7 (4.2, 7.5) 28 (7, 45) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.2)
Howard County Urban *** 5.7 (3.9, 8.1) 29 (4, 46) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.0)
Floyd County Urban *** 5.4 (3.6, 7.9) 30 (5, 46) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Marion County Urban *** 5.4 (4.8, 6.2) 31 (16, 41) 51 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Grant County Rural *** 5.4 (3.6, 8.1) 32 (5, 46) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Madison County Urban *** 5.3 (3.8, 7.2) 33 (9, 46) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.1)
Porter County Urban *** 5.3 (4.0, 6.9) 34 (10, 46) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Morgan County Urban *** 5.2 (3.2, 7.9) 35 (6, 46) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.4)
St. Joseph County Urban *** 5.2 (4.1, 6.4) 36 (13, 45) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Lawrence County Rural *** 5.0 (2.9, 8.5) 37 (4, 46) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Monroe County Urban *** 5.0 (3.5, 7.1) 38 (9, 46) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Hancock County Urban *** 5.0 (3.2, 7.5) 39 (6, 46) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Vigo County Urban *** 4.9 (3.3, 7.0) 40 (9, 46) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.2)
Lake County Urban *** 4.8 (4.0, 5.6) 41 (21, 45) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
LaPorte County Urban *** 4.8 (3.3, 6.7) 42 (12, 46) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.5)
Bartholomew County Urban *** 4.6 (2.9, 7.0) 43 (10, 46) 5 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.7, -3.8)
Kosciusko County Rural *** 4.6 (3.0, 6.9) 44 (10, 46) 5
*
*
Hamilton County Urban *** 4.2 (3.2, 5.3) 45 (25, 46) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.4)
Clark County Urban *** 3.7 (2.4, 5.4) 46 (23, 46) 5 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.6)
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jennings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaGrange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warrick County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 2:26 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top