Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | *** | 157.7 (155.9, 159.5) | N/A | 6,431 |
falling 
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -1.0) |
| United States | *** | 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) | N/A | 598,381 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.3, -1.8) |
| Wright County | *** | 131.2 (108.9, 157.5) | 95 (25, 99) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Worth County | *** | 167.3 (133.7, 207.8) | 35 (1, 97) | 19 |
stable 
|
-1.0 (-2.1, 0.0) |
| Woodbury County | *** | 175.1 (164.4, 186.3) | 18 (6, 57) | 207 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-0.9, -0.4) |
| Winneshiek County | *** | 117.0 (100.2, 136.4) | 98 (71, 99) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.8) |
| Winnebago County | *** | 133.0 (109.1, 161.5) | 93 (22, 99) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.4) |
| Webster County | *** | 164.1 (148.3, 181.2) | 39 (7, 84) | 84 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Wayne County | *** | 194.6 (156.4, 240.5) | 6 (1, 89) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.3, 0.4) |
| Washington County | *** | 172.0 (151.6, 194.7) | 22 (3, 85) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.8, 0.5) |
| Warren County | *** | 158.4 (144.2, 173.7) | 54 (13, 89) | 94 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.1) |
| Wapello County | *** | 185.8 (168.5, 204.5) | 10 (1, 56) | 89 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Van Buren County | *** | 215.5 (178.2, 259.6) | 1 (1, 63) | 25 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.5, 1.7) |
| Union County | *** | 169.7 (142.4, 201.1) | 28 (2, 94) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Taylor County | *** | 154.1 (118.2, 198.6) | 66 (2, 99) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.6) |
| Tama County | *** | 179.2 (155.7, 205.6) | 13 (1, 79) | 45 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
| Story County | *** | 139.5 (128.5, 151.2) | 86 (52, 97) | 124 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.6) |
| Sioux County | *** | 114.7 (100.4, 130.5) | 99 (82, 99) | 50 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.6) |
| Shelby County | *** | 151.4 (127.2, 179.7) | 71 (7, 99) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
| Scott County | *** | 161.9 (154.2, 170.0) | 42 (21, 71) | 343 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7) |
| Sac County | *** | 168.6 (140.0, 202.4) | 30 (1, 96) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
| Ringgold County | *** | 207.7 (166.8, 258.2) | 2 (1, 84) | 20 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.3, 1.8) |
| Poweshiek County | *** | 161.6 (140.6, 185.4) | 45 (6, 94) | 46 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.2, -0.1) |
| Pottawattamie County | *** | 171.8 (161.3, 182.8) | 23 (8, 64) | 209 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
| Polk County | *** | 160.5 (155.4, 165.8) | 47 (28, 68) | 780 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-4.1, -1.1) |
| Pocahontas County | *** | 178.1 (144.7, 218.6) | 15 (1, 94) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.0, 0.0) |
| Plymouth County | *** | 137.2 (120.3, 156.0) | 89 (37, 99) | 50 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Palo Alto County | *** | 201.5 (169.0, 239.2) | 4 (1, 65) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Page County | *** | 142.6 (122.1, 166.2) | 83 (21, 99) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Osceola County | *** | 141.5 (108.7, 182.6) | 84 (5, 99) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.8) |
| O'Brien County | *** | 143.6 (121.6, 169.0) | 81 (16, 99) | 34 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.0) |
| Muscatine County | *** | 169.9 (154.3, 186.7) | 26 (6, 78) | 91 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.1) |
| Montgomery County | *** | 189.7 (159.4, 224.9) | 7 (1, 82) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.2) |
| Monroe County | *** | 203.8 (168.0, 245.8) | 3 (1, 81) | 24 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.5, 1.3) |
| Monona County | *** | 160.5 (132.2, 194.3) | 48 (2, 97) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Mitchell County | *** | 154.3 (128.6, 184.6) | 65 (4, 98) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Mills County | *** | 167.5 (142.2, 196.3) | 33 (3, 95) | 33 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Marshall County | *** | 157.0 (142.3, 172.9) | 55 (13, 90) | 88 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.8) |
| Marion County | *** | 173.2 (156.1, 191.8) | 19 (4, 76) | 78 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.7, 0.0) |
| Mahaska County | *** | 172.7 (152.1, 195.6) | 21 (2, 86) | 54 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.5, 0.4) |
| Madison County | *** | 159.9 (136.2, 186.8) | 51 (4, 96) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.0, -0.3) |
| Lyon County | *** | 170.1 (142.1, 202.5) | 25 (1, 94) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.9, -0.1) |
| Lucas County | *** | 148.9 (122.0, 181.2) | 73 (5, 99) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.5, 0.0) |
| Louisa County | *** | 168.4 (140.2, 201.1) | 31 (2, 95) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.7, 0.4) |
| Linn County | *** | 155.4 (148.7, 162.4) | 61 (31, 79) | 416 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.9) |
| Lee County | *** | 167.3 (151.5, 184.6) | 34 (7, 79) | 86 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Kossuth County | *** | 140.7 (119.5, 165.2) | 85 (17, 99) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.8) |
| Keokuk County | *** | 161.6 (133.3, 194.9) | 46 (2, 98) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
| Jones County | *** | 144.6 (125.9, 165.6) | 79 (18, 98) | 46 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Johnson County | *** | 133.0 (124.1, 142.4) | 92 (71, 98) | 176 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.5, -1.6) |
| Jefferson County | *** | 131.7 (111.7, 154.7) | 94 (34, 99) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.6) |
| Jasper County | *** | 156.2 (141.2, 172.5) | 59 (13, 91) | 84 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.4) |
| Jackson County | *** | 158.8 (138.2, 182.0) | 52 (6, 95) | 46 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Iowa County | *** | 162.0 (139.3, 187.8) | 41 (4, 96) | 39 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.1) |
| Ida County | *** | 175.8 (142.8, 215.7) | 17 (1, 96) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.2, 1.0) |
| Humboldt County | *** | 142.6 (115.6, 174.9) | 82 (6, 99) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.8) |
| Howard County | *** | 156.7 (128.9, 189.6) | 56 (3, 99) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
| Henry County | *** | 162.5 (141.8, 185.8) | 40 (4, 93) | 46 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Harrison County | *** | 161.8 (137.4, 189.7) | 43 (4, 96) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Hardin County | *** | 181.0 (158.7, 206.1) | 12 (1, 75) | 52 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Hancock County | *** | 123.6 (100.9, 150.9) | 97 (44, 99) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.3, -0.1) |
| Hamilton County | *** | 155.0 (132.3, 180.9) | 62 (5, 97) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.7) |
| Guthrie County | *** | 150.1 (125.1, 179.7) | 72 (7, 99) | 27 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Grundy County | *** | 156.2 (132.0, 184.2) | 60 (5, 97) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.4, 0.7) |
| Greene County | *** | 171.4 (142.2, 205.8) | 24 (1, 96) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.9, 0.8) |
| Fremont County | *** | 166.9 (134.0, 206.8) | 37 (1, 98) | 20 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.3, 0.2) |
| Franklin County | *** | 131.0 (106.2, 160.6) | 96 (18, 99) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.4, 0.3) |
| Floyd County | *** | 147.7 (126.9, 171.4) | 78 (12, 98) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.8) |
| Fayette County | *** | 156.5 (136.7, 178.8) | 58 (9, 95) | 49 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Emmet County | *** | 194.7 (162.6, 232.0) | 5 (1, 83) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.1, 0.6) |
| Dubuque County | *** | 148.5 (139.1, 158.5) | 75 (38, 91) | 193 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Dickinson County | *** | 160.3 (139.6, 183.9) | 49 (7, 93) | 49 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.6, -0.1) |
| Des Moines County | *** | 169.7 (154.9, 185.6) | 29 (7, 74) | 103 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.2) |
| Delaware County | *** | 148.8 (127.9, 172.5) | 74 (13, 98) | 38 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Decatur County | *** | 186.7 (151.3, 228.8) | 8 (1, 92) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.3, 0.8) |
| Davis County | *** | 152.2 (121.4, 189.0) | 70 (3, 99) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.5, 0.8) |
| Dallas County | *** | 134.0 (122.8, 145.8) | 91 (63, 98) | 110 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.9, -1.7) |
| Crawford County | *** | 134.8 (114.0, 158.5) | 90 (24, 99) | 31 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Clinton County | *** | 168.1 (154.4, 182.8) | 32 (8, 74) | 117 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Clayton County | *** | 152.3 (132.0, 175.4) | 69 (11, 96) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.5) |
| Clay County | *** | 137.9 (117.9, 160.8) | 87 (20, 99) | 36 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Clarke County | *** | 169.8 (138.8, 206.3) | 27 (1, 95) | 22 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.1, 1.2) |
| Chickasaw County | *** | 154.4 (129.1, 183.8) | 64 (5, 98) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Cherokee County | *** | 181.2 (153.7, 213.0) | 11 (1, 84) | 37 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.6) |
| Cerro Gordo County | *** | 152.3 (139.0, 166.8) | 68 (19, 91) | 105 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Cedar County | *** | 165.6 (144.0, 189.9) | 38 (4, 93) | 45 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.3, 0.1) |
| Cass County | *** | 177.0 (151.6, 206.1) | 16 (1, 87) | 38 |
falling
|
-4.3 (-8.3, -0.1) |
| Carroll County | *** | 172.8 (151.8, 196.1) | 20 (2, 84) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
| Calhoun County | *** | 167.0 (139.1, 199.9) | 36 (2, 95) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.0, 0.3) |
| Butler County | *** | 155.0 (132.5, 180.7) | 63 (6, 97) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Buena Vista County | *** | 147.8 (126.0, 172.3) | 77 (9, 99) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Buchanan County | *** | 152.3 (132.3, 174.8) | 67 (10, 97) | 43 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Bremer County | *** | 143.7 (126.4, 163.0) | 80 (22, 98) | 52 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Boone County | *** | 160.3 (141.9, 180.6) | 50 (7, 92) | 58 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
| Black Hawk County | *** | 161.8 (152.8, 171.1) | 44 (19, 73) | 261 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
| Benton County | *** | 158.6 (140.5, 178.6) | 53 (8, 91) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Audubon County | *** | 137.5 (107.1, 176.4) | 88 (7, 99) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.0, 0.7) |
| Appanoose County | *** | 186.2 (160.4, 215.8) | 9 (1, 78) | 39 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.8, 1.3) |
| Allamakee County | *** | 148.5 (126.0, 174.5) | 76 (10, 98) | 34 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.8, 0.3) |
| Adams County | *** | 156.6 (113.5, 213.9) | 57 (1, 99) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.3) |
| Adair County | *** | 178.5 (144.2, 219.8) | 14 (1, 95) | 21 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.4, 1.1) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2022 2:52 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2022 2:52 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.