Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa *** 541.2 (535.0, 547.3) N/A 6,185 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States *** 522.2 (521.6, 522.8) N/A 565,890 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Hancock County *** 410.1 (334.6, 497.8) 99 (45, 99) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Sioux County *** 417.8 (367.6, 473.2) 98 (71, 99) 52 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Winneshiek County *** 427.9 (368.0, 494.7) 97 (53, 99) 38 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Franklin County *** 428.9 (348.5, 522.5) 96 (30, 99) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Wright County *** 439.6 (366.3, 523.3) 95 (34, 99) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Johnson County *** 449.7 (418.1, 483.0) 94 (69, 99) 159 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Jefferson County *** 459.0 (389.1, 537.8) 93 (27, 99) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Audubon County *** 463.8 (358.6, 590.4) 92 (8, 99) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Osceola County *** 470.0 (364.9, 596.6) 91 (7, 99) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Kossuth County *** 478.3 (410.3, 554.6) 90 (22, 99) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Winnebago County *** 479.7 (394.2, 578.3) 89 (10, 99) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Chickasaw County *** 480.2 (399.7, 572.2) 88 (13, 99) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Dallas County *** 482.3 (441.0, 526.5) 87 (41, 98) 104 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Crawford County *** 482.9 (409.2, 566.0) 86 (15, 99) 32 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -1.3)
Story County *** 484.0 (445.2, 525.3) 85 (43, 96) 119 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Clayton County *** 486.6 (421.8, 558.5) 84 (19, 99) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Taylor County *** 490.3 (381.8, 620.5) 83 (5, 99) 14 falling falling trend -6.6 (-11.8, -1.2)
Bremer County *** 490.9 (431.3, 556.5) 82 (21, 98) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Allamakee County *** 492.7 (419.3, 575.4) 81 (13, 99) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Cerro Gordo County *** 496.5 (452.5, 543.6) 80 (35, 96) 98 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Humboldt County *** 498.1 (408.4, 601.9) 79 (7, 99) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Hamilton County *** 498.5 (424.7, 581.6) 78 (13, 99) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Page County *** 498.9 (428.1, 578.4) 77 (15, 99) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Jackson County *** 503.3 (436.9, 576.9) 76 (13, 98) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Plymouth County *** 506.5 (445.7, 573.5) 75 (17, 98) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Harrison County *** 509.0 (431.2, 596.7) 74 (7, 99) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Jones County *** 510.7 (445.2, 583.1) 73 (12, 98) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Shelby County *** 512.6 (432.0, 604.0) 72 (7, 99) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Worth County *** 514.1 (410.3, 636.4) 71 (4, 99) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Dickinson County *** 515.2 (449.8, 587.6) 70 (12, 97) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Dubuque County *** 517.5 (484.6, 552.0) 69 (31, 89) 190 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Clay County *** 520.5 (447.0, 602.8) 68 (8, 98) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
O'Brien County *** 521.6 (444.1, 609.0) 67 (5, 98) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Butler County *** 522.7 (448.2, 606.3) 66 (8, 98) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Linn County *** 524.2 (500.9, 548.4) 65 (36, 83) 387 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Madison County *** 528.4 (447.5, 619.8) 64 (4, 98) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Iowa County *** 531.9 (455.6, 617.1) 63 (6, 98) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Black Hawk County *** 536.8 (506.6, 568.4) 62 (23, 82) 245 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Jasper County *** 538.1 (486.5, 593.6) 61 (13, 90) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Delaware County *** 538.9 (465.3, 620.7) 60 (5, 97) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Guthrie County *** 539.6 (452.6, 638.7) 59 (4, 98) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Keokuk County *** 540.6 (449.0, 645.5) 58 (3, 98) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Henry County *** 541.2 (470.1, 619.9) 57 (5, 95) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Buena Vista County *** 541.4 (463.3, 628.6) 56 (4, 97) 37 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Fayette County *** 541.8 (476.0, 614.2) 55 (7, 94) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Warren County *** 543.0 (493.2, 596.5) 54 (12, 91) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lucas County *** 543.8 (445.5, 657.5) 53 (2, 99) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Mitchell County *** 544.3 (454.5, 646.7) 52 (3, 98) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Calhoun County *** 544.5 (453.0, 649.2) 51 (4, 98) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Fremont County *** 545.0 (437.9, 670.6) 50 (2, 99) 19 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.2, 6.2)
Polk County *** 549.9 (531.8, 568.5) 49 (27, 67) 727 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Boone County *** 550.1 (486.1, 620.0) 48 (6, 92) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Davis County *** 551.2 (443.1, 677.5) 47 (2, 99) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Grundy County *** 551.3 (466.8, 646.8) 46 (3, 97) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Scott County *** 554.3 (527.3, 582.4) 45 (20, 71) 326 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Howard County *** 555.3 (456.6, 669.2) 44 (2, 98) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Benton County *** 555.7 (492.4, 624.9) 43 (6, 90) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Cherokee County *** 555.7 (472.3, 650.0) 42 (3, 97) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Poweshiek County *** 557.4 (486.1, 636.3) 41 (4, 94) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Buchanan County *** 560.3 (487.9, 640.4) 40 (4, 94) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Pocahontas County *** 563.3 (456.8, 687.7) 39 (2, 98) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Floyd County *** 564.8 (489.4, 648.7) 38 (4, 93) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Louisa County *** 566.0 (470.2, 675.6) 37 (2, 98) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Clinton County *** 566.8 (520.3, 616.4) 36 (7, 80) 112 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Adams County *** 568.0 (422.8, 747.5) 35 (1, 99) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Sac County *** 568.8 (476.6, 673.8) 34 (3, 96) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Mills County *** 569.3 (481.8, 667.9) 33 (2, 95) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Webster County *** 570.1 (515.9, 628.5) 32 (7, 82) 83 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Cedar County *** 572.9 (498.1, 655.8) 31 (3, 92) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Lee County *** 574.8 (520.3, 633.3) 30 (6, 80) 84 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Ida County *** 574.8 (463.4, 705.4) 29 (1, 98) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Greene County *** 578.0 (480.0, 690.5) 28 (2, 96) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Marshall County *** 578.8 (526.0, 635.6) 27 (5, 78) 91 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Washington County *** 580.1 (511.6, 655.4) 26 (3, 87) 54 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Lyon County *** 581.4 (483.6, 693.1) 25 (2, 95) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Cass County *** 581.7 (498.9, 674.4) 24 (2, 92) 37 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.5, 1.0)
Union County *** 583.3 (493.4, 684.8) 23 (2, 93) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Mahaska County *** 583.6 (512.8, 661.6) 22 (3, 87) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Des Moines County *** 584.6 (533.8, 639.0) 21 (5, 75) 100 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Adair County *** 585.6 (475.6, 713.8) 20 (1, 97) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Pottawattamie County *** 591.3 (554.9, 629.5) 19 (7, 58) 202 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Muscatine County *** 591.8 (536.9, 650.7) 18 (4, 76) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Carroll County *** 593.1 (522.8, 670.4) 17 (3, 85) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Woodbury County *** 595.5 (558.2, 634.6) 16 (6, 58) 196 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
Clarke County *** 596.8 (488.6, 721.8) 15 (1, 97) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Marion County *** 605.7 (545.6, 670.6) 14 (3, 70) 76 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Monona County *** 607.6 (508.3, 720.7) 13 (1, 93) 28 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Tama County *** 609.4 (530.6, 696.6) 12 (2, 83) 45 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Wayne County *** 616.0 (494.6, 758.4) 11 (1, 97) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Appanoose County *** 623.7 (535.6, 722.3) 10 (1, 82) 37 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Hardin County *** 627.2 (551.2, 711.0) 9 (2, 72) 52 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Wapello County *** 640.1 (581.0, 703.7) 8 (2, 51) 88 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Montgomery County *** 644.5 (543.3, 759.1) 7 (1, 81) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Emmet County *** 648.0 (542.3, 768.6) 6 (1, 80) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Decatur County *** 648.2 (527.2, 788.7) 5 (1, 90) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Palo Alto County *** 672.5 (563.8, 796.3) 4 (1, 78) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Van Buren County *** 723.8 (597.0, 869.4) 3 (1, 73) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Monroe County *** 756.3 (628.5, 902.7) 2 (1, 46) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Ringgold County *** 779.6 (627.3, 958.1) 1 (1, 53) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/03/2021 7:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top