Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Iowa by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | N/A | No | 128.4 (126.3, 130.6) | N/A | 2,960 |
falling 
|
-1.2 (-1.5, -1.0) |
| United States | N/A | No | 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) | N/A | 285,526 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.4, -1.1) |
| Polk County | Urban | No | 138.2 (132.1, 144.6) | 29 (17, 51) | 396 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.6) |
| Linn County | Urban | No | 126.5 (118.6, 134.9) | 51 (27, 74) | 201 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.8, -1.0) |
| Scott County | Urban | No | 130.2 (121.1, 139.8) | 43 (21, 71) | 159 |
falling
|
-5.2 (-11.1, -1.1) |
| Black Hawk County | Urban | No | 124.5 (114.0, 135.8) | 57 (25, 81) | 113 |
falling
|
-6.9 (-12.3, -1.1) |
| Woodbury County | Urban | No | 161.1 (147.4, 175.7) | 9 (2, 33) | 107 |
stable 
|
-0.2 (-0.7, 0.3) |
| Pottawattamie County | Urban | No | 145.5 (132.6, 159.4) | 18 (5, 54) | 99 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-3.9, -0.3) |
| Dubuque County | Urban | No | 128.1 (116.4, 140.8) | 49 (18, 77) | 98 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| Johnson County | Urban | Yes | 99.9 (90.1, 110.4) | 93 (65, 97) | 80 |
falling
|
-9.7 (-16.3, -1.8) |
| Story County | Urban | Yes | 120.0 (106.4, 134.9) | 67 (23, 89) | 61 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.2) |
| Clinton County | Rural | No | 147.2 (129.8, 166.7) | 15 (3, 65) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.1, 0.0) |
| Dallas County | Urban | Yes | 100.3 (88.6, 113.1) | 92 (59, 98) | 55 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.5, -1.5) |
| Cerro Gordo County | Rural | Yes | 122.2 (105.7, 141.0) | 62 (16, 91) | 48 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.9) |
| Des Moines County | Rural | No | 133.6 (115.5, 154.1) | 36 (7, 84) | 43 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
| Muscatine County | Rural | No | 140.4 (121.6, 161.4) | 26 (5, 77) | 43 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.3) |
| Wapello County | Rural | No | 162.5 (140.5, 187.2) | 4 (1, 51) | 42 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
| Lee County | Rural | No | 142.0 (122.3, 164.6) | 23 (4, 74) | 40 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.4) |
| Warren County | Urban | Yes | 112.7 (97.3, 130.0) | 74 (28, 96) | 40 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-8.4, 0.2) |
| Jasper County | Urban | No | 137.7 (118.1, 159.9) | 31 (5, 82) | 40 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Marion County | Rural | No | 144.1 (123.3, 167.8) | 20 (3, 73) | 38 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.7, 0.7) |
| Marshall County | Rural | No | 122.7 (105.3, 142.6) | 61 (15, 91) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Webster County | Rural | Yes | 120.4 (102.5, 141.1) | 65 (17, 93) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
| Boone County | Urban | No | 140.8 (117.5, 167.9) | 25 (2, 85) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
| Mahaska County | Rural | No | 157.8 (131.3, 188.8) | 11 (1, 67) | 28 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.6, 0.9) |
| Benton County | Urban | No | 127.1 (105.2, 152.9) | 50 (6, 93) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.4) |
| Washington County | Urban | No | 136.8 (111.9, 166.1) | 34 (3, 91) | 24 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.7, 1.1) |
| Clayton County | Rural | No | 153.8 (124.1, 189.5) | 13 (1, 81) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.9, 0.3) |
| Carroll County | Rural | Yes | 113.1 (91.7, 139.1) | 73 (16, 98) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.9, 0.3) |
| Sioux County | Rural | Yes | 87.2 (70.8, 106.7) | 97 (64, 98) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.4) |
| Hardin County | Rural | No | 141.3 (113.7, 174.7) | 24 (2, 90) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.3) |
| Bremer County | Urban | Yes | 110.6 (89.8, 135.5) | 81 (20, 98) | 22 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.2, 3.2) |
| Dickinson County | Rural | Yes | 115.3 (91.9, 144.3) | 70 (8, 98) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
| Plymouth County | Rural | Yes | 106.2 (86.1, 130.2) | 86 (26, 98) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.5, -0.9) |
| Buchanan County | Rural | No | 136.8 (111.5, 166.9) | 33 (3, 91) | 21 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.3, 0.0) |
| Henry County | Rural | No | 131.1 (106.1, 161.2) | 39 (4, 94) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.2) |
| Fayette County | Rural | Yes | 110.8 (87.9, 139.0) | 80 (12, 98) | 20 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.3, -0.2) |
| Jackson County | Rural | Yes | 121.4 (97.4, 150.5) | 63 (7, 96) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Tama County | Rural | No | 155.7 (124.5, 193.1) | 12 (1, 83) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
| Appanoose County | Rural | No | 165.1 (132.3, 205.6) | 3 (1, 76) | 19 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.6, 1.8) |
| Jefferson County | Rural | No | 138.5 (109.9, 174.0) | 28 (2, 93) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
| Page County | Rural | No | 125.1 (99.8, 156.9) | 54 (5, 96) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Winneshiek County | Rural | Yes | 102.0 (80.5, 128.6) | 90 (27, 98) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.3, -0.4) |
| Cass County | Rural | No | 143.2 (113.9, 179.7) | 22 (1, 90) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
| Poweshiek County | Rural | Yes | 111.0 (87.8, 139.5) | 79 (15, 98) | 18 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-15.9, -1.3) |
| Floyd County | Rural | No | 130.4 (103.4, 163.5) | 42 (4, 96) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Jones County | Urban | Yes | 111.4 (88.1, 139.8) | 77 (15, 98) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
| Delaware County | Rural | Yes | 111.9 (88.8, 140.4) | 76 (13, 98) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.5, 0.5) |
| Cedar County | Rural | Yes | 113.3 (89.7, 142.4) | 72 (12, 98) | 17 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.0, -0.2) |
| Kossuth County | Rural | Yes | 118.5 (91.5, 152.5) | 69 (5, 98) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.4) |
| Butler County | Rural | No | 124.8 (97.1, 159.4) | 56 (4, 97) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-2.0, -0.1) |
| Cherokee County | Rural | No | 139.4 (108.7, 178.3) | 27 (1, 93) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.6, 0.1) |
| Hamilton County | Rural | No | 122.9 (95.8, 156.5) | 60 (6, 97) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.2, -0.2) |
| Buena Vista County | Rural | Yes | 113.6 (88.4, 144.2) | 71 (10, 98) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| O'Brien County | Rural | No | 125.3 (96.1, 161.7) | 52 (3, 97) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.0, 0.7) |
| Allamakee County | Rural | No | 130.4 (100.9, 167.2) | 41 (3, 97) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.9, 0.4) |
| Harrison County | Urban | No | 128.5 (100.1, 163.8) | 47 (3, 96) | 15 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.3) |
| Mitchell County | Rural | No | 152.9 (119.0, 195.8) | 14 (1, 88) | 15 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.5, 0.4) |
| Palo Alto County | Rural | No | 192.2 (147.5, 248.4) | 2 (1, 62) | 15 |
stable
|
23.1 (-0.2, 39.3) |
| Iowa County | Rural | Yes | 108.3 (83.7, 138.9) | 84 (16, 98) | 15 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.1, -0.3) |
| Wright County | Rural | No | 131.1 (100.1, 170.2) | 40 (2, 97) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.9, 0.3) |
| Mills County | Urban | No | 138.1 (106.5, 177.1) | 30 (1, 96) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) |
| Clay County | Rural | Yes | 94.6 (72.2, 123.0) | 95 (33, 98) | 14 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.5, -0.3) |
| Grundy County | Urban | Yes | 120.2 (92.0, 156.1) | 66 (6, 97) | 13 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.7, 1.8) |
| Montgomery County | Rural | No | 161.3 (122.6, 209.9) | 8 (1, 86) | 13 |
falling
|
-26.0 (-34.9, -16.1) |
| Howard County | Rural | No | 161.3 (122.7, 210.2) | 7 (1, 86) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.3, 1.1) |
| Chickasaw County | Rural | No | 144.8 (108.8, 190.2) | 19 (1, 96) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.2, 0.4) |
| Madison County | Urban | Yes | 108.8 (83.1, 140.7) | 83 (13, 98) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.2, 0.0) |
| Sac County | Rural | No | 132.6 (98.5, 177.1) | 38 (1, 98) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.6, 0.7) |
| Crawford County | Rural | Yes | 105.9 (80.3, 137.9) | 87 (16, 98) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.5, -0.5) |
| Union County | Rural | No | 124.0 (93.4, 162.8) | 58 (3, 98) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.4, -0.1) |
| Louisa County | Rural | No | 146.4 (110.1, 192.5) | 16 (1, 96) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.6, 0.6) |
| Monona County | Rural | No | 143.4 (106.5, 191.5) | 21 (1, 96) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.8, 0.4) |
| Van Buren County | Rural | No | 194.2 (143.2, 259.9) | 1 (1, 65) | 11 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.1, 2.0) |
| Winnebago County | Rural | Yes | 106.8 (80.2, 142.2) | 85 (13, 98) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.7, 0.9) |
| Clarke County | Rural | No | 162.3 (119.4, 216.5) | 5 (1, 88) | 11 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.4, 1.7) |
| Franklin County | Rural | No | 129.2 (95.7, 172.7) | 46 (2, 98) | 11 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.1, 1.4) |
| Emmet County | Rural | No | 123.3 (89.9, 167.7) | 59 (2, 98) | 11 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
| Lyon County | Rural | Yes | 112.5 (82.4, 151.3) | 75 (5, 98) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.3, 0.2) |
| Shelby County | Rural | Yes | 89.2 (65.2, 121.6) | 96 (36, 98) | 11 |
falling
|
-3.5 (-17.6, -1.2) |
| Adair County | Rural | No | 162.0 (118.2, 219.5) | 6 (1, 93) | 11 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.7, 1.0) |
| Greene County | Rural | No | 130.0 (94.5, 176.9) | 44 (2, 98) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.8, 0.9) |
| Keokuk County | Rural | No | 128.4 (93.5, 174.1) | 48 (2, 98) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.5, 1.1) |
| Guthrie County | Urban | Yes | 99.6 (72.3, 136.4) | 94 (18, 98) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.0, 0.6) |
| Ida County | Rural | No | 159.5 (115.9, 217.5) | 10 (1, 95) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.0, 1.1) |
| Hancock County | Rural | Yes | 101.3 (72.2, 140.2) | 91 (12, 98) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.2) |
| Calhoun County | Rural | Yes | 105.5 (75.1, 146.7) | 88 (9, 98) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.1, 0.5) |
| Lucas County | Rural | No | 125.2 (90.2, 172.1) | 53 (2, 98) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
| Humboldt County | Rural | Yes | 104.4 (74.9, 144.4) | 89 (10, 98) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.4, -0.2) |
| Monroe County | Rural | No | 137.1 (97.6, 190.1) | 32 (1, 98) | 8 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
| Pocahontas County | Rural | Yes | 120.9 (83.4, 173.3) | 64 (1, 98) | 8 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.6, -0.8) |
| Decatur County | Rural | Yes | 110.4 (77.1, 157.1) | 82 (5, 98) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.9, 0.8) |
| Fremont County | Rural | No | 129.3 (88.1, 186.7) | 45 (1, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.2, 0.9) |
| Davis County | Rural | Yes | 119.1 (80.9, 170.1) | 68 (2, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.3, 0.7) |
| Wayne County | Rural | No | 132.7 (89.8, 191.9) | 37 (1, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.2, 0.4) |
| Osceola County | Rural | No | 135.3 (91.8, 196.2) | 35 (1, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.1, 2.7) |
| Worth County | Rural | Yes | 111.2 (76.1, 160.3) | 78 (4, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-2.7, 0.0) |
| Audubon County | Rural | No | 124.9 (85.3, 182.0) | 55 (1, 98) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.6, 0.9) |
| Ringgold County | Rural | No | 145.9 (96.6, 217.7) | 17 (1, 98) | 6 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.1, 2.2) |
| Taylor County | Rural | Yes | 82.1 (49.8, 132.4) | 98 (20, 98) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.1, 1.6) |
| Adams County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 4:07 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 4:07 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.