Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa *** 48.7 (47.6, 49.8) N/A 1,673 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States *** 48.4 (48.3, 48.5) N/A 171,025 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Fremont County *** 45.1 (25.4, 75.5) 69 (1, 97) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.4)
Hancock County *** 27.5 (15.7, 46.0) 97 (38, 97) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
Floyd County *** 43.3 (30.6, 60.1) 74 (9, 97) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Mitchell County *** 46.9 (31.0, 69.3) 62 (4, 97) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.0)
Winneshiek County *** 28.2 (18.9, 41.1) 96 (59, 97) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.0)
Jefferson County *** 40.6 (28.3, 57.3) 80 (11, 97) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Lucas County *** 31.0 (18.4, 51.3) 94 (27, 97) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Marion County *** 46.4 (36.6, 58.1) 66 (15, 93) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Plymouth County *** 39.2 (29.4, 51.6) 85 (30, 97) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Iowa County *** 42.0 (29.4, 58.8) 78 (12, 97) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Dallas County *** 38.0 (32.2, 44.5) 88 (52, 95) 31 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Shelby County *** 39.8 (25.4, 60.5) 83 (9, 97) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Dubuque County *** 40.1 (34.6, 46.4) 81 (48, 93) 42 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Fayette County *** 50.8 (37.5, 67.7) 46 (5, 93) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Marshall County *** 44.9 (36.2, 55.2) 70 (21, 93) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Bremer County *** 35.0 (25.2, 47.6) 90 (38, 97) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Buchanan County *** 39.7 (28.7, 53.8) 84 (21, 97) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Delaware County *** 34.7 (23.5, 50.0) 91 (30, 97) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Johnson County *** 40.0 (35.1, 45.3) 82 (53, 93) 52 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Butler County *** 55.1 (39.5, 75.4) 33 (2, 93) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Lee County *** 54.0 (44.1, 65.9) 37 (6, 80) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Polk County *** 46.6 (43.9, 49.4) 65 (41, 75) 230 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Sioux County *** 30.9 (22.4, 41.4) 95 (56, 97) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Benton County *** 45.7 (35.1, 58.9) 67 (13, 94) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Boone County *** 33.9 (25.3, 45.0) 92 (47, 97) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Crawford County *** 39.1 (27.3, 54.8) 86 (17, 97) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Hardin County *** 62.1 (47.2, 80.9) 15 (1, 80) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
O'Brien County *** 43.6 (29.9, 62.2) 72 (8, 97) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.0)
Palo Alto County *** 65.5 (44.2, 94.5) 10 (1, 91) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Cerro Gordo County *** 49.3 (40.4, 59.9) 49 (12, 88) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Clarke County *** 58.6 (38.9, 85.6) 19 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.1)
Linn County *** 47.5 (43.5, 51.7) 59 (33, 76) 113 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Black Hawk County *** 52.3 (46.7, 58.5) 42 (18, 70) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Decatur County *** 69.5 (44.7, 104.0) 5 (1, 96) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.6)
Harrison County *** 56.6 (40.4, 77.8) 27 (1, 94) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Pocahontas County *** 68.1 (44.5, 102.2) 7 (1, 92) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Pottawattamie County *** 57.9 (51.3, 65.2) 22 (7, 57) 62 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Story County *** 38.7 (32.5, 45.8) 87 (48, 95) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Warren County *** 47.6 (39.6, 56.9) 58 (18, 89) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Carroll County *** 55.6 (41.8, 72.8) 31 (2, 90) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Clay County *** 42.3 (30.2, 58.3) 76 (13, 97) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Jasper County *** 53.3 (43.5, 64.9) 38 (7, 83) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Kossuth County *** 55.6 (39.4, 76.7) 30 (2, 93) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Muscatine County *** 56.2 (46.8, 67.2) 29 (6, 74) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Page County *** 47.5 (34.1, 65.2) 60 (6, 95) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Scott County *** 52.6 (48.0, 57.7) 40 (18, 65) 100 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Chickasaw County *** 43.1 (27.8, 64.4) 75 (6, 97) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Dickinson County *** 56.8 (41.5, 76.4) 26 (2, 90) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Emmet County *** 54.9 (34.9, 82.8) 34 (1, 97) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Lyon County *** 51.9 (35.5, 74.0) 45 (2, 96) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Monona County *** 57.4 (37.4, 85.6) 23 (1, 96) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Wayne County *** 75.4 (47.3, 115.2) 2 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Worth County *** 52.5 (31.0, 84.2) 41 (1, 97) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Buena Vista County *** 48.4 (35.3, 65.1) 54 (6, 95) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Guthrie County *** 41.4 (26.2, 63.4) 79 (7, 97) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.6)
Mills County *** 54.4 (39.5, 73.8) 36 (2, 92) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Montgomery County *** 71.7 (50.3, 100.0) 4 (1, 85) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Audubon County *** 47.1 (28.4, 78.3) 61 (2, 97) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Hamilton County *** 60.3 (44.2, 81.0) 18 (1, 88) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Henry County *** 56.3 (42.8, 73.0) 28 (2, 88) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Howard County *** 37.2 (22.8, 58.9) 89 (10, 97) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Jackson County *** 49.1 (35.7, 66.1) 51 (6, 95) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Wapello County *** 66.6 (55.2, 79.8) 9 (1, 55) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Webster County *** 51.9 (42.0, 63.6) 44 (7, 85) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Wright County *** 42.3 (26.9, 63.7) 77 (6, 97) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Appanoose County *** 58.6 (42.3, 80.2) 20 (1, 90) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Cherokee County *** 64.2 (44.2, 90.8) 11 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Mahaska County *** 49.7 (37.7, 64.8) 48 (6, 93) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Poweshiek County *** 44.9 (31.8, 62.0) 71 (9, 96) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Clayton County *** 52.0 (38.0, 70.1) 43 (3, 93) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Clinton County *** 61.0 (51.8, 71.5) 17 (3, 61) 35 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Des Moines County *** 54.8 (45.3, 66.0) 35 (6, 79) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Tama County *** 67.2 (51.0, 87.2) 8 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Washington County *** 50.3 (37.7, 66.0) 47 (5, 93) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Woodbury County *** 55.5 (49.2, 62.4) 32 (11, 65) 60 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Cass County *** 62.6 (44.6, 86.1) 14 (1, 89) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Grundy County *** 46.7 (31.8, 67.1) 64 (5, 97) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Union County *** 79.7 (58.0, 107.2) 1 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Greene County *** 48.2 (30.9, 73.3) 56 (2, 97) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Louisa County *** 69.2 (50.0, 94.3) 6 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Allamakee County *** 43.4 (28.9, 63.2) 73 (6, 97) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Calhoun County *** 52.8 (34.3, 78.7) 39 (1, 96) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Jones County *** 48.3 (36.5, 63.4) 55 (7, 93) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Monroe County *** 63.9 (42.3, 94.2) 12 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Cedar County *** 46.9 (34.2, 63.2) 63 (7, 96) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Franklin County *** 49.3 (32.5, 73.0) 50 (2, 97) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Keokuk County *** 63.8 (43.2, 91.6) 13 (1, 90) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Madison County *** 61.6 (46.4, 80.9) 16 (1, 83) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Sac County *** 73.7 (51.5, 103.3) 3 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Adair County *** 57.3 (34.7, 90.4) 24 (1, 97) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Ringgold County *** 57.2 (33.5, 95.2) 25 (1, 97) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.1)
Davis County *** 48.8 (29.6, 76.3) 53 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Humboldt County *** 49.0 (30.8, 75.0) 52 (2, 97) 6
*
*
Osceola County *** 45.3 (24.0, 79.5) 68 (1, 97) 3
*
*
Taylor County *** 58.5 (31.8, 98.7) 21 (1, 97) 3
*
*
Van Buren County *** 47.8 (28.0, 77.9) 57 (1, 97) 4
*
*
Winnebago County *** 33.7 (20.7, 53.1) 93 (19, 97) 5
*
*
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/19/2022 10:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Adams, Ida

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top