Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Iowa by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | N/A | No | 179.2 (176.4, 182.0) | N/A | 3,362 |
falling 
|
-2.2 (-3.9, -1.2) |
| United States | N/A | No | 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) | N/A | 317,428 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-1.8, -1.8) |
| Washington County | Urban | No | 137.0 (110.8, 167.9) | 96 (39, 99) | 20 |
falling
|
-10.1 (-23.7, -1.3) |
| Johnson County | Urban | No | 135.5 (122.6, 149.3) | 97 (76, 99) | 87 |
falling
|
-6.4 (-12.0, -2.5) |
| Story County | Urban | No | 142.4 (126.3, 160.0) | 93 (60, 99) | 59 |
falling
|
-4.9 (-11.6, -1.9) |
| Dallas County | Urban | No | 142.0 (126.0, 159.4) | 95 (60, 99) | 60 |
falling
|
-2.9 (-4.9, -2.1) |
| Wright County | Rural | No | 152.8 (119.2, 194.2) | 88 (16, 99) | 15 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-4.3, -1.7) |
| Jones County | Urban | No | 148.3 (121.9, 179.4) | 92 (29, 99) | 23 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.8, -1.4) |
| Hamilton County | Rural | No | 160.7 (127.8, 200.3) | 82 (12, 99) | 17 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.8, -1.4) |
| Harrison County | Urban | No | 178.8 (142.8, 222.0) | 60 (6, 99) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.7, -1.2) |
| Lee County | Rural | No | 190.1 (165.4, 217.8) | 37 (8, 85) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.9, -1.3) |
| Buena Vista County | Rural | No | 160.2 (128.6, 197.3) | 84 (15, 99) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.7, -1.0) |
| Humboldt County | Rural | No | 160.9 (121.5, 210.9) | 81 (8, 99) | 12 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.0, -0.8) |
| Winneshiek County | Rural | No | 123.6 (99.5, 152.7) | 99 (70, 99) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.9, -0.8) |
| Benton County | Urban | No | 159.2 (132.8, 189.6) | 85 (20, 99) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.4, -1.0) |
| Butler County | Rural | No | 176.3 (141.4, 218.2) | 66 (6, 98) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.7, -0.7) |
| Cerro Gordo County | Rural | No | 178.7 (157.4, 202.3) | 62 (14, 89) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.2, -1.3) |
| Dubuque County | Urban | No | 170.3 (155.4, 186.3) | 74 (31, 90) | 100 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
| Linn County | Urban | No | 168.0 (157.8, 178.6) | 76 (45, 87) | 213 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.0, -1.4) |
| Osceola County | Rural | No | 168.7 (121.5, 231.8) | 75 (4, 99) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.8, -0.6) |
| Monona County | Rural | No | 182.0 (139.7, 235.7) | 46 (3, 99) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.8, -0.6) |
| Marshall County | Rural | No | 191.1 (166.8, 218.0) | 34 (7, 85) | 46 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.8) |
| Bremer County | Urban | No | 180.6 (151.5, 213.9) | 49 (8, 96) | 28 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.6) |
| Buchanan County | Rural | No | 184.6 (151.8, 222.7) | 43 (5, 97) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.2, -0.6) |
| Des Moines County | Rural | No | 196.2 (172.5, 222.5) | 26 (6, 80) | 52 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
| Fayette County | Rural | No | 164.0 (133.8, 199.5) | 79 (15, 99) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.4, -0.5) |
| Fremont County | Rural | No | 182.6 (133.4, 247.0) | 45 (2, 99) | 10 |
stable 
|
-1.4 (-2.9, 0.1) |
| Kossuth County | Rural | No | 151.1 (120.9, 187.9) | 90 (22, 99) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.5) |
| Scott County | Urban | No | 180.5 (168.5, 193.1) | 50 (25, 79) | 178 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
| Warren County | Urban | No | 161.1 (140.6, 183.8) | 80 (31, 98) | 47 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.7) |
| Clinton County | Rural | No | 199.7 (177.7, 223.9) | 24 (6, 74) | 63 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8) |
| Dickinson County | Rural | No | 164.4 (135.8, 198.4) | 78 (16, 99) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.5) |
| Hancock County | Rural | No | 170.4 (132.0, 218.1) | 73 (6, 99) | 14 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.2) |
| Muscatine County | Rural | No | 177.9 (154.4, 204.0) | 64 (12, 93) | 44 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.6) |
| O'Brien County | Rural | No | 175.2 (139.2, 218.5) | 68 (5, 99) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.5) |
| Polk County | Urban | No | 190.6 (182.3, 199.2) | 36 (21, 61) | 426 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.6, -1.1) |
| Sioux County | Rural | No | 134.4 (112.3, 159.7) | 98 (61, 99) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Woodbury County | Urban | No | 179.3 (163.2, 196.5) | 57 (20, 86) | 97 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
| Worth County | Rural | No | 170.7 (124.8, 230.4) | 72 (3, 99) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.6, -0.1) |
| Delaware County | Rural | No | 181.1 (148.3, 219.7) | 48 (6, 97) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Hardin County | Rural | No | 179.4 (147.3, 217.5) | 55 (6, 97) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.4) |
| Jasper County | Urban | No | 179.2 (156.2, 204.8) | 58 (13, 91) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Clay County | Rural | No | 151.9 (122.1, 187.8) | 89 (22, 99) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.1, -0.1) |
| Floyd County | Rural | No | 182.9 (149.4, 222.8) | 44 (5, 96) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.0, -0.3) |
| Jackson County | Rural | No | 192.8 (160.9, 230.0) | 31 (4, 92) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.1, -0.2) |
| Jefferson County | Rural | No | 149.3 (117.5, 188.0) | 91 (20, 99) | 17 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.1, 0.1) |
| Keokuk County | Rural | No | 196.2 (151.5, 251.2) | 27 (2, 98) | 14 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.1, -0.1) |
| Madison County | Urban | No | 243.9 (199.8, 295.1) | 3 (1, 66) | 23 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.0) |
| Palo Alto County | Rural | No | 229.9 (179.9, 291.1) | 7 (1, 86) | 15 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.1, -0.2) |
| Pottawattamie County | Urban | No | 212.6 (195.2, 231.1) | 16 (4, 49) | 117 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.6) |
| Wapello County | Rural | No | 213.2 (185.6, 243.9) | 14 (2, 72) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Webster County | Rural | No | 203.9 (178.2, 232.5) | 20 (4, 75) | 48 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Adams County | Rural | No | 179.9 (111.1, 280.1) | 52 (1, 99) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.4, 0.3) |
| Allamakee County | Rural | No | 179.8 (143.1, 223.8) | 53 (5, 98) | 19 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.2, 0.1) |
| Audubon County | Rural | No | 181.8 (127.4, 255.4) | 47 (1, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.9, 0.8) |
| Black Hawk County | Urban | No | 189.5 (175.3, 204.6) | 39 (16, 73) | 137 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Boone County | Urban | No | 206.7 (175.1, 242.5) | 19 (2, 79) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-2.8, -0.4) |
| Calhoun County | Rural | No | 193.2 (149.3, 247.3) | 30 (2, 98) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.1, 0.0) |
| Clayton County | Rural | No | 186.4 (154.6, 223.9) | 42 (5, 94) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
| Crawford County | Rural | No | 160.2 (126.3, 200.7) | 83 (10, 99) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-2.0, -0.1) |
| Grundy County | Urban | No | 190.0 (150.5, 237.6) | 38 (2, 97) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.2, 0.2) |
| Henry County | Rural | No | 186.6 (154.5, 223.8) | 41 (5, 95) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Mills County | Urban | No | 180.3 (142.8, 225.4) | 51 (4, 98) | 17 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.3, 0.5) |
| Sac County | Rural | No | 157.1 (118.3, 206.3) | 87 (8, 99) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.1, 0.0) |
| Carroll County | Rural | No | 176.8 (147.2, 211.3) | 65 (10, 97) | 26 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.7, -0.1) |
| Mitchell County | Rural | No | 158.0 (120.5, 205.0) | 86 (8, 99) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.0, 0.2) |
| Plymouth County | Rural | No | 174.9 (146.5, 207.5) | 69 (10, 97) | 28 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.7, -0.2) |
| Poweshiek County | Rural | No | 170.7 (140.1, 206.9) | 71 (12, 98) | 23 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
| Appanoose County | Rural | No | 176.0 (140.4, 219.4) | 67 (6, 99) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.0, 0.4) |
| Cedar County | Rural | No | 179.4 (147.5, 216.9) | 56 (7, 97) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.9, 0.4) |
| Guthrie County | Urban | No | 178.8 (138.7, 228.6) | 61 (4, 99) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.8, 0.1) |
| Marion County | Rural | No | 195.5 (169.1, 225.1) | 28 (5, 84) | 41 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.3) |
| Shelby County | Rural | No | 171.3 (134.7, 216.4) | 70 (7, 99) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.9, 0.3) |
| Howard County | Rural | No | 194.1 (149.4, 249.6) | 29 (1, 99) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.9, 0.6) |
| Lucas County | Rural | No | 210.0 (163.5, 267.8) | 17 (1, 97) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.7, 0.5) |
| Mahaska County | Rural | No | 178.3 (147.4, 214.1) | 63 (8, 97) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.3, 0.0) |
| Tama County | Rural | No | 190.6 (155.7, 231.7) | 35 (3, 95) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Union County | Rural | No | 223.9 (178.5, 278.1) | 10 (1, 84) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.6, 0.3) |
| Wayne County | Rural | No | 200.6 (145.5, 272.1) | 22 (1, 99) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.0, 0.5) |
| Cass County | Rural | No | 197.7 (158.2, 245.2) | 25 (1, 94) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.8, 0.6) |
| Franklin County | Rural | No | 179.7 (137.8, 231.7) | 54 (3, 99) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
| Louisa County | Rural | No | 188.6 (144.3, 242.9) | 40 (2, 99) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.0, 0.9) |
| Page County | Rural | No | 192.6 (157.5, 234.1) | 32 (3, 94) | 22 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| Taylor County | Rural | No | 179.0 (127.4, 247.5) | 59 (1, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.4) |
| Winnebago County | Rural | No | 202.3 (157.7, 256.8) | 21 (1, 95) | 15 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
| Adair County | Rural | No | 142.3 (101.6, 196.6) | 94 (14, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.7, 0.7) |
| Cherokee County | Rural | No | 167.0 (130.4, 212.2) | 77 (8, 99) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.9, 0.8) |
| Decatur County | Rural | No | 230.0 (173.6, 300.6) | 6 (1, 93) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.0, 1.0) |
| Iowa County | Rural | No | 223.9 (185.3, 268.8) | 9 (1, 78) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.4, 0.5) |
| Pocahontas County | Rural | No | 213.1 (161.7, 278.8) | 15 (1, 94) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.6, 0.6) |
| Ida County | Rural | No | 210.0 (158.9, 275.3) | 18 (1, 97) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.6, 0.9) |
| Montgomery County | Rural | No | 224.8 (177.4, 282.4) | 8 (1, 86) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
| Chickasaw County | Rural | No | 191.2 (151.5, 239.3) | 33 (3, 97) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.3, 0.8) |
| Emmet County | Rural | No | 239.8 (187.6, 303.4) | 4 (1, 79) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.9) |
| Clarke County | Rural | No | 233.7 (182.3, 296.0) | 5 (1, 86) | 15 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.3, 1.5) |
| Davis County | Rural | No | 220.9 (167.2, 287.0) | 11 (1, 93) | 12 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.6, 1.6) |
| Van Buren County | Rural | No | 213.9 (162.2, 279.3) | 13 (1, 97) | 12 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.2, 1.3) |
| Lyon County | Rural | No | 200.3 (157.2, 252.3) | 23 (1, 96) | 15 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.8, 10.6) |
| Monroe County | Rural | No | 215.7 (160.8, 284.7) | 12 (1, 96) | 11 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.2, 1.7) |
| Greene County | Rural | No | 263.6 (208.3, 330.5) | 2 (1, 59) | 17 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.7, 1.7) |
| Ringgold County | Rural | No | 273.3 (201.0, 367.4) | 1 (1, 79) | 10 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.5, 2.8) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/12/2025 3:35 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/12/2025 3:35 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.