Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa No 155.4 (153.6, 157.2) N/A 6,131 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Polk County No 155.7 (150.5, 161.1) 56 (33, 71) 710 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Linn County No 151.1 (144.4, 158.1) 62 (38, 81) 396 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Scott County No 160.2 (152.2, 168.5) 42 (21, 70) 317 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Black Hawk County No 157.1 (148.0, 166.7) 51 (22, 76) 237 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Pottawattamie County No 177.7 (166.8, 189.2) 15 (5, 46) 209 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Woodbury County No 185.5 (173.8, 197.9) 9 (3, 34) 198 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Dubuque County No 144.9 (135.5, 154.9) 75 (40, 91) 187 stable stable trend -5.7 (-13.2, 2.5)
Johnson County No 127.6 (118.7, 137.1) 96 (74, 99) 160 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Story County No 136.3 (125.2, 148.1) 90 (50, 98) 118 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Clinton County No 164.0 (150.3, 178.8) 35 (10, 79) 111 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Dallas County No 130.3 (119.3, 142.0) 95 (63, 99) 106 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.8)
Cerro Gordo County No 155.9 (142.1, 170.9) 54 (14, 87) 105 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Des Moines County No 164.0 (149.2, 180.2) 34 (8, 78) 96 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Warren County No 145.0 (131.5, 159.7) 74 (30, 95) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Wapello County No 185.4 (167.7, 204.7) 10 (1, 48) 86 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Jasper County No 161.7 (146.2, 178.5) 39 (9, 83) 85 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Lee County No 172.4 (156.0, 190.4) 20 (4, 74) 85 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Muscatine County No 170.1 (153.7, 188.0) 24 (5, 76) 84 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Webster County No 168.4 (152.0, 186.3) 27 (6, 78) 83 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Marshall County No 155.2 (139.8, 172.2) 57 (14, 91) 80 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Marion County No 179.5 (162.0, 198.6) 14 (2, 61) 80 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Benton County No 159.3 (141.1, 179.4) 44 (7, 90) 58 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Boone County No 155.9 (137.7, 176.1) 55 (9, 95) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Mahaska County No 180.0 (158.6, 203.8) 13 (1, 72) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Plymouth County No 143.3 (125.7, 163.0) 78 (22, 98) 51 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Washington County No 163.3 (143.0, 186.0) 37 (4, 91) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Bremer County No 141.1 (123.8, 160.4) 81 (25, 98) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Carroll County No 158.6 (138.6, 181.0) 46 (8, 93) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Sioux County Yes 114.0 (99.5, 130.1) 98 (79, 99) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Hardin County No 168.8 (146.9, 193.7) 26 (3, 87) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Clayton County No 160.6 (139.4, 184.7) 41 (4, 94) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Jackson County No 150.1 (130.5, 172.3) 64 (12, 97) 45 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Fayette County No 145.8 (126.4, 167.9) 72 (18, 98) 45 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Dickinson County No 140.5 (121.7, 162.3) 84 (19, 99) 45 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Poweshiek County No 157.4 (136.4, 181.2) 50 (7, 95) 44 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Buchanan County No 156.1 (135.8, 179.0) 52 (7, 95) 44 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Henry County No 158.8 (138.0, 182.3) 45 (6, 95) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Jones County No 138.1 (119.7, 159.0) 87 (25, 99) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Cedar County No 152.0 (131.4, 175.4) 61 (10, 97) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Cass County No 188.3 (161.4, 219.1) 7 (1, 71) 40 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.8, 0.3)
Tama County No 170.8 (146.4, 198.8) 23 (2, 88) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Floyd County No 152.2 (130.8, 176.8) 60 (9, 97) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Delaware County No 146.4 (125.6, 170.1) 69 (11, 98) 38 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Butler County No 156.1 (133.5, 182.1) 53 (6, 97) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Appanoose County No 165.3 (141.7, 192.6) 32 (2, 92) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Iowa County No 153.2 (131.0, 178.5) 59 (7, 96) 36 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Winneshiek County Yes 113.8 (97.1, 133.1) 99 (74, 99) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Jefferson County No 141.0 (119.4, 166.1) 82 (18, 99) 36 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Page County No 138.7 (118.4, 162.3) 86 (22, 99) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Kossuth County No 137.2 (115.9, 161.9) 88 (20, 99) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Clay County No 134.8 (114.8, 157.8) 91 (26, 99) 35 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Hamilton County No 146.0 (124.2, 171.3) 71 (12, 98) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Cherokee County No 171.9 (145.0, 203.3) 21 (1, 92) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Madison County No 162.7 (138.8, 189.8) 38 (3, 95) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Harrison County No 160.7 (136.7, 188.4) 40 (3, 96) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Mills County No 169.1 (143.6, 198.1) 25 (2, 93) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Grundy County No 167.4 (142.1, 196.7) 29 (2, 92) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
O'Brien County No 140.8 (118.9, 166.4) 83 (13, 99) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Union County No 185.0 (156.1, 218.3) 11 (1, 84) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Buena Vista County No 146.3 (123.0, 173.7) 70 (10, 98) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Allamakee County No 142.6 (119.2, 170.1) 80 (12, 99) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Crawford County No 142.7 (119.9, 169.7) 79 (12, 99) 31 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Montgomery County No 194.9 (163.6, 231.3) 5 (1, 73) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Palo Alto County No 200.2 (167.3, 238.8) 4 (1, 70) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Shelby County No 146.9 (122.7, 175.5) 68 (8, 99) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Wright County No 143.6 (119.0, 172.8) 77 (9, 99) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Chickasaw County No 159.5 (133.3, 190.1) 43 (3, 97) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Sac County No 166.6 (137.9, 200.6) 31 (2, 97) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Guthrie County No 148.7 (123.5, 178.7) 65 (8, 99) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Calhoun County No 164.6 (136.2, 198.3) 33 (2, 97) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Mitchell County No 148.7 (123.5, 178.5) 66 (6, 99) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Monona County No 167.0 (137.3, 202.5) 30 (1, 96) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Lyon County No 154.7 (128.2, 185.7) 58 (4, 98) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Emmet County No 177.2 (145.3, 215.3) 16 (1, 94) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Greene County No 164.0 (135.5, 198.0) 36 (2, 98) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Keokuk County No 158.1 (130.1, 191.2) 47 (3, 98) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Van Buren County No 222.9 (183.8, 269.1) 1 (1, 39) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Howard County No 157.8 (129.6, 191.4) 48 (2, 98) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Louisa County No 167.9 (137.2, 204.3) 28 (1, 97) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Winnebago County No 134.2 (109.9, 163.4) 92 (20, 99) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Clarke County No 182.0 (148.2, 222.1) 12 (1, 95) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Ida County No 188.3 (154.1, 229.8) 6 (1, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Hancock County No 125.0 (102.0, 152.8) 97 (29, 99) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Pocahontas County No 175.5 (141.9, 216.6) 17 (1, 95) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Lucas County No 148.0 (120.7, 181.0) 67 (5, 99) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Humboldt County No 140.5 (113.5, 173.1) 85 (8, 99) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Monroe County No 186.1 (151.4, 227.5) 8 (1, 92) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Adair County No 171.0 (137.6, 211.6) 22 (1, 97) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Franklin County No 130.9 (105.4, 162.0) 94 (19, 99) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Wayne County No 200.8 (161.3, 248.4) 3 (1, 84) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Ringgold County No 216.1 (173.9, 268.3) 2 (1, 71) 20 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Worth County No 175.3 (141.1, 216.6) 18 (1, 95) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Decatur County No 172.8 (138.1, 214.6) 19 (1, 97) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Fremont County No 150.8 (119.0, 190.1) 63 (3, 99) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Davis County No 144.8 (114.6, 181.1) 76 (5, 99) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Osceola County No 157.4 (121.7, 202.3) 49 (1, 99) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Audubon County No 131.9 (101.9, 170.9) 93 (9, 99) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Taylor County No 136.9 (103.2, 179.8) 89 (4, 99) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Adams County No 145.4 (102.7, 203.1) 73 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 7:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top